Also, is the character on the bottom there meant to be a girl, or some type of futanari/male?
Posted under General
Also, is the character on the bottom there meant to be a girl, or some type of futanari/male?
Also, is the character on the bottom there meant to be a girl, or some type of futanari/male?
You mean argentinian_miku?
Plenty_of_Poi said:
post #8917320 and child, both don’t strike as Loli. Flat chest certainly, otherwise nope. Want second opinion to reinforce before removing tag.
While she does also not have much in the way of hips, I would still agree, doesn't seem like a loli.
santander said:
Also, is the character on the bottom there meant to be a girl, or some type of futanari/male?
post #8568969 is funny because it is seemingly the same physique as the one directly above I called not loli, but that realistic style and commentary context make it loli here.
post #8814706 is pretty chibi but I think it should still be loli.
post #8677445 not loli and looks like normal cunnilingus without any dicks involved to me.
post #4643104 and child
comment #2497274
EvergreenNights said:
No.
Blank_User said:
Even the girl on the left?
Same height and doesn't appear to be younger, just smaller breasts.
Blank_User said:
I’ve seen posts tagged loli for less. The swimsuits are pretty revealing here, especially the crotch of the girl on the right.
Well if you want to go for it go for it. The parent has the tag anyway.
post #8503472 is absolutely sexualized and absolutely loli, and despite being logically the same age the girl in post #8891161 on the left looks plenty loli.
ANON_TOKYO said:
post #8503472 is absolutely sexualized and absolutely loli, and despite being logically the same age the girl in post #8891161 on the left looks plenty loli.
Agreed.
post #8967377
Looks early/mid teens to me.
Blank_User said:
post #8967377
Looks early/mid teens to me.
Looks like an elementary school aged character to me.