Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

trapster77 said in forum #420935:

so am i not supposed to upload cropped if the uncropped is already posted?

post #10873262

Of course not. Why would we also want the cropped version if there's no improvement in quality or resolution? Your post isn't just a cropped version of an existing post, but also a lower resolution (1123 pixels wide vs 3000 pixels wide), lower quality (more image artifacts) version of an existing post.

There is no justification for posting this, and even less for appealing it. If a user doesn't want to see the penis, they can crop it themself, or even just hide it off-screen.

post #10879013
post #10875712
post #10854164

Any reason why these didn't go through? All look nicely drawn to me

post #10837625
post #10837648

starcrossed said in forum #421032:

The duplicates I uploaded are all deleted even through they're in perfect quality all because I'm wrongfully accused of being some fucking sockpuppet! It's an outrage! Now I can't upload anything anymore!!!

Don't upload duplicates next time.

post #10800670
post #10746990
post #10819851

werte.move said in forum #421046:

post #10800670

Feet look a bit weird to me personally

post #10881239
post #10854152 (apparently 'poor quality', when it looks just like the parent post)
post #10843155
post #10804468

Would like to know why these didn't go through, especially the 2nd image being labeled as "poor quality" when it's in the same quality as the parent post

Blank_User said in forum #421004:

Of course not. Why would we also want the cropped version if there's no improvement in quality or resolution? Your post isn't just a cropped version of an existing post, but also a lower resolution (1123 pixels wide vs 3000 pixels wide), lower quality (more image artifacts) version of an existing post.

There is no justification for posting this, and even less for appealing it. If a user doesn't want to see the penis, they can crop it themself, or even just hide it off-screen.

i won't do this in the future but i feel like the wiki should mention this then

btw my cute posts keep getting deleted :(

post #10858432
post #10875700
post #10858670

post #10358889 (Questionable)

This isn't even one of mine; I just really like it. While the piece errs on the side of being exaggerated, the proportions are internally consistent, and the style is so soft & clean that each portion of the image feels right at home with the others.

Plus, the expression & pose exude a... relaxed mundanity, or at least that's my attempt to put the feeling into words. And that feeling isn't always found in posts of this sort.

Good pics

post #10859028
post #10889412

post #10883227
post #10883250

The other three images from this set (same twitter post, even) were approved

post #6680134 General rating

Is Lumine's (blonde) left hand count as bad anatomy ?

trapster77 said in forum #421062:

i won't do this in the future but i feel like the wiki should mention this then

It already does.

Sometimes the cropped version is of higher resolution than the equivalent portion of the full picture, in which case it makes sense to upload both images.

This implies that if the resolution is the same or lower, then it would not make sense to upload both. The only time it would be acceptable to upload both is if the inferior version were uploaded first and the uploader was reasonably sure at the time that it was the best quality available. Ideally, only the superior version would be uploaded. This is a basic principle of uploading that Builders should know by heart.

fakemon (also the rest of this artist's posts weren't deleted)
post #10088842 , post #10088841
post #10088828
post #10088891
post #10088899 , post #10088898
post #10088827

Blank_User said in forum #421110:

It already does.

This implies that if the resolution is the same or lower, then it would not make sense to upload both. The only time it would be acceptable to upload both is if the inferior version were uploaded first and the uploader was reasonably sure at the time that it was the best quality available. Ideally, only the superior version would be uploaded. This is a basic principle of uploading that Builders should know by heart.

as a Builder, i'm so aware of that that i uploaded the cropped version because i genuinely thought and STILL think that out-of-frame censoring makes the image better. it sucks that other Builders don't share my opinion that the cropped version is the superior version. just to be clear i'm not trolling. i see now that if the post got approved that would mean all cropped posts would get approved and lots of posts would end up with 2 uppable posts all of sudden, so i'm not doing it again, but i still think that rating:q is better than the rating:e so it's the superior version as far as i'm concerned.

trapster77 said in forum #421114:

as a Builder, i'm so aware of that that i uploaded the cropped version because i genuinely thought and STILL think that out-of-frame censoring makes the image better. it sucks that other Builders don't share my opinion that the cropped version is the superior version. just to be clear i'm not trolling. i see now that if the post got approved that would mean all cropped posts would get approved and lots of posts would end up with 2 uppable posts all of sudden, so i'm not doing it again, but i still think that rating:q is better than the rating:e so it's the superior version as far as i'm concerned.

Superiority is not based on subjective taste. On Danbooru, "superior" means higher resolution, higher image quality, least edited, not "I think this arbitrary part of the picture being removed or out of frame makes it look better." The help:post_relationships page makes it very clear what is considered superior on this site.

Hello, I wanna know why these didn’t get approved.

post #10768099 (E)
post #10848952 (E)
post #10880261 (E)
post #10666179 (E)
post #10758585 (E)

post #10827881(11 approvers)

For your approval

shinrain said in forum #421140:

post #10827881(11 approvers)

For your approval

Gave you an appeal, at least.