CaptainPants said in forum #420233:
I really don't understand why my posts are not approved, I genuinely want some feedback from the reviewers.
post #10835469 is not being approved, but the previous version was approved post #10496511
post #10840203 got a score of 136 within 3 days, I genuinely don't believe the problem is with the quality.
I really want an explanation as to why my submissions are not approved.
I can't comment on the quality because I don't like looking at genitalia but having a high score doesn't mean quality on its own.
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #420236:
Same here,I mostly upload fate-related fan arts and illustrations. Many of which are "Good enough(Good quality,high resolution) for me." However, many of the posts are deleted after the 3 day mark. I really do not understand the standard. I agree with AI-generated of AI-assisted arts need to be deleted as soon as possible,but many of the arts that I uploaded are hand-drawn and some of them were drawn before AI generated images was even a thing:
post #10552506
post #10567606
post #10569508
post #10572987
post #10574700
post #10581170
post #10583389
post #10586251
post #10788686
post #10667419
post #10831107
post #10831119
post #10844629
Personally,some of the more glaring deletes for me,are post #10572987 , post #10831107 and post #10831119.
For post post #10572987, the artist also uploaded FGO Ishtar Fan Arts that got approved on this website, and yet. The Ereshkigal fan art drawn by the very same artists,got deleted and even appeals could not save it from being deleted. Same cases with post #10831107 and post #10831119. The same artists also drew several other FGO Ishtar fan arts that got approved,while these 2 got deleted. In addition I really do not see the problem with post #10844629 ,in which I think it does not deserved to be deleted.
Last but not least, post #10856017 was still pending approval here,and I am afraid that it too would be deleted after the 3 day mark.
I think a lot of these aren't good enough in terms of quality, mostly due to anatomy issues or poor colouring/shading.
StarfishAtLarge said in forum #420353:
It's hard not to wonder about this.
To me, post #10581576 (Sensitive), post #10602478 (General), and post #10818202 (Explicit) are easily better than other images that I've seen approved, some of which I uploaded myself. Before I put these three images forward, I probably would've bet money on them being approved, because I couldn't see the reasoning for why they wouldn't be. And, indeed, I still can't see it, because all I ever see is "disinterest".
I don't process what standards they fail to meet.
For the first two, I'm not a fan of the faces. Faces tend to be a big sticking point for a lot of approvers because that's usually where the eye is drawn to first.
TheGamingRodent said in forum #420366:
post #10842698
post #10842852
post #10804490
Any reason why these didn't go through? They're pretty nicely drawn and I don't see anything wrong with them
Furry posts aren't particularly high quality. Gura post I'm put off by the face.
Jinzo_Jacker said in forum #420414:
How often do approvers check status:deleted child:active ?
Seems like there's a lot of obvious stuff to approve there.
A couple do every so often. I need to do this more often tbh.
StarfishAtLarge said in forum #420450:
And these images are apparently good enough to be approved.
post #10863036
post #10862094
I genuinely don't understand. I am trying to, and I don't.
I don't particularly like the first one much but for the second one I like it. Simple doesn't always mean bad, hence why this was approved and why I would approve it if I happened to be the one to see it in queue.
RaccoonOrgy said in forum #420471:
Unsure why this one isn't getting approved.
post #10847341
Shading feels all over the place whilst the proportions/angle don't look particularly great to me.
lullabyfan said in forum #420472:
Why not? Is it the artstyle, the subject matter, the fact that it's a comic? Should I stop posting anything from JLullaby going forward?
I can't comment on the quality because it's rating:e but don't listen to the person replying to you. They aren't an approver and therefore can't reliably be trusted with what is deemed as high quality. Comics can be fine but risky to upload. Again I won't look at it for personal preference so I can't tell you if it's good or not sadly.