Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

nyatbn said in forum #420213:

Usually a post just needs to be revealing enough and it will be automatically disapproved (examples: post #10825727, post #10820107, post #10821654) without any reason. No issues with non revealing posts (300+ uploads) of comparable or even lower quality.

I guess i will stick to not uploading any more posts (even if i could). Artistic skill or quality does not seem to matter at all...

Yeah, this unfortunately. It’s that too many approvers refuse to approve

wiiaboo said in forum #420323:

https://safebooru.donmai.us/posts/10862351 looks a lot worse than some of mine. Also the two rare super sentai ones were drawn by literal kids, weird how no one has noticed that vampire character yet

You can simply write "post #10862351" (without the quotes), instead of pasting the entire URL; the post ID is in the URL, and also on the sidebar of the post page. This also allows users to hover over the link to see a preview, and prevents users from being redirected to Safebooru from the main site and vice versa.

nyatbn said in forum #420213:

Artistic skill or quality does not seem to matter at all...

It's hard not to wonder about this.

To me, post #10581576 (Sensitive), post #10602478 (General), and post #10818202 (Explicit) are easily better than other images that I've seen approved, some of which I uploaded myself. Before I put these three images forward, I probably would've bet money on them being approved, because I couldn't see the reasoning for why they wouldn't be. And, indeed, I still can't see it, because all I ever see is "disinterest".

I don't process what standards they fail to meet.

lol I just found that all deleted posts of misaki_(blue_archive) is kinda good to have. The better way you want a artwork to be seen on this site is not to upload it (it probably got permanently deleted after an appeal and nobody gonna recycle it from deleted posts), but send the link to random contributor and wait!

StarfishAtLarge said in forum #420353:

It's hard not to wonder about this.

To me, post #10581576 (Sensitive), post #10602478 (General), and post #10818202 (Explicit) are easily better than other images that I've seen approved, some of which I uploaded myself. Before I put these three images forward, I probably would've bet money on them being approved, because I couldn't see the reasoning for why they wouldn't be. And, indeed, I still can't see it, because all I ever see is "disinterest".

I don't process what standards they fail to meet.

Yeah, relatable. It’s really unfortunate that some fan art approvers refuse to approve

CaptainPants said in forum #420233:

I really don't understand why my posts are not approved, I genuinely want some feedback from the reviewers.

post #10835469 is not being approved, but the previous version was approved post #10496511

post #10840203 got a score of 136 within 3 days, I genuinely don't believe the problem is with the quality.

I really want an explanation as to why my submissions are not approved.

I can't comment on the quality because I don't like looking at genitalia but having a high score doesn't mean quality on its own.

Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #420236:

Same here,I mostly upload fate-related fan arts and illustrations. Many of which are "Good enough(Good quality,high resolution) for me." However, many of the posts are deleted after the 3 day mark. I really do not understand the standard. I agree with AI-generated of AI-assisted arts need to be deleted as soon as possible,but many of the arts that I uploaded are hand-drawn and some of them were drawn before AI generated images was even a thing:
post #10552506
post #10567606
post #10569508
post #10572987
post #10574700
post #10581170
post #10583389
post #10586251
post #10788686
post #10667419
post #10831107
post #10831119
post #10844629

Personally,some of the more glaring deletes for me,are post #10572987 , post #10831107 and post #10831119.

For post post #10572987, the artist also uploaded FGO Ishtar Fan Arts that got approved on this website, and yet. The Ereshkigal fan art drawn by the very same artists,got deleted and even appeals could not save it from being deleted. Same cases with post #10831107 and post #10831119. The same artists also drew several other FGO Ishtar fan arts that got approved,while these 2 got deleted. In addition I really do not see the problem with post #10844629 ,in which I think it does not deserved to be deleted.
Last but not least, post #10856017 was still pending approval here,and I am afraid that it too would be deleted after the 3 day mark.

I think a lot of these aren't good enough in terms of quality, mostly due to anatomy issues or poor colouring/shading.

StarfishAtLarge said in forum #420353:

It's hard not to wonder about this.

To me, post #10581576 (Sensitive), post #10602478 (General), and post #10818202 (Explicit) are easily better than other images that I've seen approved, some of which I uploaded myself. Before I put these three images forward, I probably would've bet money on them being approved, because I couldn't see the reasoning for why they wouldn't be. And, indeed, I still can't see it, because all I ever see is "disinterest".

I don't process what standards they fail to meet.

For the first two, I'm not a fan of the faces. Faces tend to be a big sticking point for a lot of approvers because that's usually where the eye is drawn to first.

TheGamingRodent said in forum #420366:

post #10842698
post #10842852
post #10804490

Any reason why these didn't go through? They're pretty nicely drawn and I don't see anything wrong with them

Furry posts aren't particularly high quality. Gura post I'm put off by the face.

Jinzo_Jacker said in forum #420414:

How often do approvers check status:deleted child:active ?

Seems like there's a lot of obvious stuff to approve there.

A couple do every so often. I need to do this more often tbh.

StarfishAtLarge said in forum #420450:

And these images are apparently good enough to be approved.

post #10863036
post #10862094

I genuinely don't understand. I am trying to, and I don't.

I don't particularly like the first one much but for the second one I like it. Simple doesn't always mean bad, hence why this was approved and why I would approve it if I happened to be the one to see it in queue.

RaccoonOrgy said in forum #420471:

Unsure why this one isn't getting approved.

post #10847341

Shading feels all over the place whilst the proportions/angle don't look particularly great to me.

lullabyfan said in forum #420472:

Why not? Is it the artstyle, the subject matter, the fact that it's a comic? Should I stop posting anything from JLullaby going forward?

I can't comment on the quality because it's rating:e but don't listen to the person replying to you. They aren't an approver and therefore can't reliably be trusted with what is deemed as high quality. Comics can be fine but risky to upload. Again I won't look at it for personal preference so I can't tell you if it's good or not sadly.

can these get feedback or a second look please, i think they're all good. some of these at least deserve an appeal but i already used pretty much all of mine for my own posts

(G)
post #10852922
post #9510883
post #9510909
post #8849469
post #8844267
post #9522006

(S)
post #10059351
post #9022115
post #8773381
post #8840890
post #8615548
post #9538962

(Q)
post #10774210
post #9488688
post #9297511

(E)
post #10264803
post #10315128
post #9902208
post #10098078
post #10098066
these last two Es are in a set where the rest is approved so idk why these two were skipped