Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

ruili said:
post #8134383
post #8134569
post #8194563
post #8194581
post #8194617
post #8201033

Not an approver, but I'll see what stands out to me.
8134383 - it's okay. The art style is a bit odd, so some people might be turned off by that. Anatomy is a little strange as well, but this is more stylysitic and I think it might get a clear.
8134569 - chibi work that's not my preferred style and content, but seems decent. The big thing to keep in mind is that not everyone may be drawn to the same stuff you do, which may limit the appeal from the approvers. I think this has a chance of clearing though.
8194563 - wow, line work is ROUGH. faces are okay, but pretty much everything else looks like a quick sketch. This is not the type of "quality" that the booru typically approves.
8194581 - line work is decent, colors are okay, but the anatomy is very stiff and doll-like. the shoulders are very square and the body language is very two-dimensional. it's borderline, but more on the "not approve" side than "approve."
8194617 - rough anatomy again, fuzzy detail work on pretty much everything but most noticably the clothing, the posture is very unnatural. the biggest flaw is in the hips and thighs. they don't feel right and I think that's going to hold this back from getting through.

SidBarrett said:

Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #8201672
post #6337656

I'll be honest, 6337656 has a really weird vibe to me that is borderline uncanny valley. I know that 3d art has a tendency to be a bit of a hard sell unless it is exceptionally good, but this feels like a bad video game render.

8201672 - might clear. it's gotten an appeal so there's a shot. The texture is a bit rough and the posture is a little wonky, but this is definitely borderline.

Not low quality
post #8174461
post #8201377
post #8184060
post #8198318

Variations via artwork
post #8100429 post #7612902

Please take the review work seriously. Works that are supposed to pass are often blocked or deleted by you.

post #7902845

Aside from male_focus, is there anything in particular that prevented this art from being approved? The only other detail I notice is that there's not a discernible light source, but I don't know whether that would be taken into consideration.

Update: Thanks Komzu!

drinkyourvegetables said:

post #7902845

Aside from male_focus, is there anything in particular that prevented this art from being approved? The only other detail I notice is that there's not a discernible light source, but I don't know whether that would be taken into consideration.

I could see the anatomy being seen as a little on the amateurish side (his torso is quite long for example) for a lot of approvers but I don't think it's egregious myself. It's definitely borderline though.

post #6342593 are sexy anime girls in their underwear not allowed anymore?

post #8208671
Hello, I would like to understand why this upload is considered low quality. I found it more visually appealing than some of my previous uploads, so there must be aspects I'm not recognizing.

post #8209364
Requesting feedback on this one.

post #8133387
And this one. I could understand the pregnant one not passing, but this is a standard paizuri.

post #8196766
Official animation, high quality from what I can see. Related animation got approved.

tamuraakemi said:

post #8196766
Official animation, high quality from what I can see. Related animation got approved.

What's the difference between that post and post #8196742?

HyphenSam said:

What's the difference between that post and post #8196742?

They're different animations. Watch them from beginning to end. You'll notice the dragon doesn't wake up in post #8196766.

post #8210988
post #8209899
Requesting feedback for this one

Hello, Would appreciate some feedback on post #8211878 and post #8211828

EDIT: They got approved, thanks for giving them a second chance.

Hello,
Is there any feedback regarding deleting this posts?
These posts are of good quality. Similar posts have been approved.

post #8193130
post #8197335
post #8200188
post #8208838
post #8208843
post #8208861
post #8208863
post #8208875
post #8208876
post #8209336
post #8211176
post #8212080

Mr.Martin said:

Hello, Would appreciate some feedback on post #8211878 and post #8211828

Those were definitely the victim of small approver sample size. Only six people looked at them. It happens sometimes.

Hi, any feedback on why this post wasn't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #6593182

No feedback only a small rant to get off my chest.
Don't you guys hate it when you upload something and it already gets a ton of disapprovals even though it's very good quality? That's all.

Why were these disapproved?

post #8211281
post #8211259
post #8211083
post #8206756
post #8192666

No one even looked at this:
post #7983121

Properly sourced art for a professional product:
post #8099736

It's beyond me what the problem is supposed to be. Artist usually passes 9/10. Just bad moderation luck maybe?

notfrontloaded said:

post #6629196
post #7774204
post #7780583
post #8143878

rating:s,q
Why is 7774204 poor quality? It's not the best work by the artist, but I don't think the hands or anything are that bad.

bumping my post bc no reply.