Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

SlaughteredMelon said:

I see you already appealed your upload and you fixed your tagging, so excellent job. For now, you must wait three days until an Approver accepts the appeal to restore your post. I must warn you: Appealing doesn't guarantee getting a post back, as it can fail and your post will remain deleted. Read the How To Appeal manual for more information.

In the meantime, you can continue uploading. Just remember to tag your posts properly, and if you have additional time, read The Upload Rules, it'll save you a lot of trouble.

I think another user Blank User helped me with some retagging as well, thank you to them. I hope the appeal goes through, so far two approvers have passed it over already so I'm not enthusiastic about the chances. I'll see. Thanks again for your help.

A_neu said:

Thank you, this was my first upload and I did have plans to keep uploading. How should I proceed from here? Should I just add a load of tags according to the link you sent and appeal? Or do I need to revise the art itself?

There's a bit of a misunderstanding here. While a few Approvers may take tags into account, there is no requirement that posts must be properly tagged in order to get approved save for the artist and source. However, uploaders are required to sufficiently tag their posts as best they can. In other words, tagging doesn't matter all that much for getting posts approved, but you still need to do it anyway.

That said, you're off to a good start on the tagging. I added a few more for you. Also, did you draw this yourself? If so, be sure to add the self-upload tag.

Edit: Ah, I see you already noticed. Also, two approvers is nothing. You still have almost 3 days left, so it still has a fair shot.

Why wasn't it approved?
post #7778823

Why was this not approved?
post #7797455

BUR #28313 has been rejected.

create alias butterfly-shaped_earrings -> butterfly_earrings
create implication butterfly_earrings -> butterfly

I see no reason why we can't expand the definition of butterfly earrings to include earrings shaped like butterflies, and there's only one post in butterfly-shaped earrings anyway.
As for the other one, I think it should be fairly obvious.

MintyBea said:

BUR #28313 has been rejected.

create alias butterfly-shaped_earrings -> butterfly_earrings
create implication butterfly_earrings -> butterfly

I see no reason why we can't expand the definition of butterfly earrings to include earrings shaped like butterflies, and there's only one post in butterfly-shaped earrings anyway.
As for the other one, I think it should be fairly obvious.

I did not mean to post this BUR here

Casriun said:

Why wasn't it approved?
post #7778823

Low quality render.

post #5743231
The post has nsfw elements, but the body structure is generally fine.

Ads129 said:

Why was this not approved?
post #7797455

Would love to know personally

Ads129 said:

Why was this not approved?
post #7797455

Proportions are off, she looks weirdly short, and you uploaded a low resolution thumbnail image instead of the full version.

post #7782944
post #5745821

post #7800899

Hello, is this one really bad ? Because I think both the quality and proportions are good but maybe there's something else that is off ? If yes, I'd like to know, thanks !

gfz said:

Proportions are off, she looks weirdly short, and you uploaded a low resolution thumbnail image instead of the full version.

Quasimodox drew her pants rather baggy so it does kinda give off the impression she looks shorter than she is but also that's just his art style but yeah I should have uploaded the full version

What’s wrong with this time
post #7802046

Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:

What’s wrong with this time
post #7802046

Start adding sources to your uploads. Sourcing is not optional. Out of your 12 uploads, only 3 of them have proper sources, and only one of them was provided by you.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=status%3Adeleted+user%3Aatomicexplorer
I think these posts I uploaded have been unfairly deleted. I don't think they are significantly lower in quality than other posts.

GranAutismo said:

Start adding sources to your uploads. Sourcing is not optional. Out of your 12 uploads, only 3 of them have proper sources, and only one of them was provided by you.

It has artist credit, but fine I'll add it. The Oberon also had artist credit, the ones that didn't either for some reason I couldn't find again (only in the case of the reaction images), or were literally impossible to find sourcing for. Was never told this before now, and on the Desu the main complaint was something about "quality" not that

Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:

It has artist credit, but fine I'll add it. The Oberon also had artist credit, the ones that didn't either for some reason I couldn't find again (only in the case of the reaction images), or were literally impossible to find sourcing for. Was never told this before now, and on the Desu the main complaint was something about "quality" not that

Read help:upload and help:upload rules.

gfz said:

Read help:upload and help:upload rules.

It says I have to artist tag, which I did here, I was mistaken to not do it for the reaction images I shall confess.

What's wrong with these posts?

post #7668669
post #7802782
post #7802791