Requesting feedback on these two uploads:
Posted under General
Requesting feedback on these two uploads:
What's wrong with these posts?
post #7781519
post #7781283
post #7780773
post #7780231
post #7781427
check them
Low quality??
torrrr said:
Low quality??
You uploaded inferior duplicates (lower resolution) of existing posts.
Wondering why these got deleted:
Ok, we need to talk about my two most recent posts.
So. First off, post #7790096. Now, I was kind of expecting this one to get deleted, in all honesty? I was just testing the waters, ya know. My question is, was it at least closer to the quality standard than anything prior, and how do you think I can improve?
Now for the post I have issue with: post #7788438. This was another test-of-the-waters post, but not for my art; rather, for a copyright I like. I know it's not bad quality, and the approvers agree. I think it has a chance to pass appealing, but I just want a few second opinions.
May I ask why my artworks are usually deleted? Are they not good enough for this platform or what is the reason?
Especially this one: post #7786282
Hi, any feedback on why these post weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #6921544
Updated by SidBarrett
SidBarrett said:
Hi, any feedback on why these post weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #7788993
post #7789335
post #6921544
IMO the anatomy in #7788993 is notably off, particularly around both character's hands.
Hi, can I ask why this was rejected?
post #7777028
Mediahead said:
Hi, can I ask why this was rejected?
post #7777028
Before uploading art, I would advise to spend at least 1 minute examining it in detail in enlarged mode
1. The hands have an extremely terrible design and this is immediately noticeable
2. If you look at the lower part, you will notice an incomprehensible asymmetrical “depression”. The waist looks slightly broken.
3. General twitchy drawing and serious anatomy problems
It's official art and I'm not sure what about it would be an issue
Heartcatcher said:
It's official art and I'm not sure what about it would be an issue
No issue, again just the approvers being really fucking picky
MintyBea said:
Ok, we need to talk about my two most recent posts.
So. First off, post #7790096. Now, I was kind of expecting this one to get deleted, in all honesty? I was just testing the waters, ya know. My question is, was it at least closer to the quality standard than anything prior, and how do you think I can improve?
Now for the post I have issue with: post #7788438. This was another test-of-the-waters post, but not for my art; rather, for a copyright I like. I know it's not bad quality, and the approvers agree. I think it has a chance to pass appealing, but I just want a few second opinions.
If you want advice on how to improve your own art, you should share your art on forums designed for that purpose. You won't get that kind of advice here. The best you'll probably get is that you should spend a few years refining your skills and receiving critique from other artists. If you do that, then maybe your self-uploads will have a better shot.
As for the other post, I won't get into specifics since I'm not an Approver, but most approved art I see has a higher degree of polish. I wouldn't say this looks bad, but it does look a bit rough. But even good art can be skipped over simply because the Approvers aren't into the art style.
Also, don't assume that just because Approvers didn't click the Poor Quality button means they don't believe it's poor quality. The only thing you can know for sure is that they didn't give a reason. And given that 12 Approvers skipped over it, there's a decent chance some of them skipped it over because they thought it was below average.
Hello, could someone help me understand why my post post #7794746 was deleted?
thank you.
A_neu said:
Hello, could someone help me understand why my post post #7794746 was deleted?
thank you.
I am not an Approver, but I'll give you some advice: Improve your tagging, because your post lacks of proper tags in the first place regardless of its quality. If you have plans to keep uploading, take some time to read The Tagging Manual, because tagging properly your uploads is necessary.
SlaughteredMelon said:
I am not an Approver, but I'll give you some advice: Improve your tagging, because your post lacks of proper tags in the first place regardless of its quality. If you have plans to keep uploading, take some time to read The Tagging Manual, because tagging properly your uploads is necessary.
Thank you, this was my first upload and I did have plans to keep uploading. How should I proceed from here? Should I just add a load of tags according to the link you sent and appeal? Or do I need to revise the art itself?
Is there a reason why this post was deleted
post #5530130
A_neu said:
Thank you, this was my first upload and I did have plans to keep uploading. How should I proceed from here? Should I just add a load of tags according to the link you sent and appeal? Or do I need to revise the art itself?
I see you already appealed your upload and you fixed your tagging, so excellent job. For now, you must wait three days until an Approver accepts the appeal to restore your post. I must warn you: Appealing doesn't guarantee getting a post back, as it can fail and your post will remain deleted. Read the How To Appeal manual for more information.
In the meantime, you can continue uploading. Just remember to tag your posts properly, and if you have additional time, read The Upload Rules, it'll save you a lot of trouble.