imply superman -> clark_kent (brainstorming a policy for superheroes vs civilian identities)

Posted under Tags

since it's not clear from the bur, afterwards should posts like post #10541659 post #10114946 stay tagged spider-man (peter parker) which will imply peter parker or will the posts with Miles Morales have to be retagged to spider man (miles morales)?more specifically if you can see miles morales head in a spider man suit what will that get tagged as?

nevermind, i misunderstood what the bur was doing. but posts with 2 spidermans will need to be affected like post post #10114946

Updated by trapster77

I understand the intent behind the current proposal, but I believe we are overlooking the practical utility of the database in favor of a "biographical accuracy" that complicates information retrieval.

1. The value of the "Master Tag" (Concept over Biography):
It is much more likely that a user wants to find every version of Spider-Man with a single click (using a master tag) than wanting to save a click when searching for Peter_Parker to see his civilian and superhero versions combined.

If we adopt the current proposal, we force any user searching for the visual archetype to perform a massive manual OR of every existing variant. This penalizes search by visual concept, which is the most common use case for an image board.

2. The distinction between Civilian and Alter Ego:
Mixing civilians and superheroes under the same parent tag breaks the visual distinction. Maintaining the status quo of separate identities—while grouping all hero variants under a master tag (spider-man)—is a much cleaner solution. It is more efficient to keep the hero as a collective concept and the civilian identities as separate entities, rather than forcing a biographical link that creates noise in the search results.

nonamethanks said in forum #432412:

Without answering the rest of the topic first - are you seriously using an LLM to reply? You even left the em dashes in... C'mon.

I used it to translate my ideas into English because it's not my native language, but the logic remains: a visual database should prioritize archetypes over biography. If you have a counter-argument to the search-retrieval issue, I'd love to hear it. Otherwise, focusing on the punctuation is just avoiding the actual problem with the BUR.

This is going to be a big one, here we go --


PersonalFowl said in forum #432360:

Something to keep in mind is how to handle situations like post #11072120 where it's ambiguous if that's Peter Parker or Miles Morales

Damian0358 said in forum #432364:

Technically, nonamethanks already answered that.

But I raised that point earlier in the preceding topic #34656, where I pushed against the wholesale branding of Spider-Man into Peter Parker (Spider-Man) when it's never been used for just Peter. Doing that change would require gardening that tag and making a decision on all the Spider-Men who wear similar suits to Peter, ala Spider-Man (Original Suit) and Spider-Man (Original Black Suit), especially since Peter himself has enough variance with his suits (and thankfully no one has been insane enough to propose something, like, making a tag for Maguire!Spider-Man's suit, which is distinct from Garfield!Spider-Man's suit and Holland!Spider-Man's suit in the same way it is distinct from Yamashiro Takuya's suit).

Cases where it's ambiguous which differently-named character it is are VERY few, because different characters' suits are made to be distinct for branding reasons. If you see the original blue suit you can just assume it's peter parker without having to worry too much.

The real problem is cases like Peter B Parker, but the real question is whether Peter B Parker should imply Peter Parker - or in general, how to deal with alternate universe versions of the same character.
There's two ways to solve this that I can think of:


In my suggested proposal, and assuming we treat alternate version as additional modifier chartags and not entire new layers of implications:

post #8376961 would look like this:

post #6482175 would be like this (assuming we create further subtags for all the billion different suits):


If we instead treat them as separate characters:

post #8376961 would look like this:

post #6482175 would like this (again, assuming we create further subtags for all the billion different suits):


The second option here is more pleasing for me in the first case, but the second case reveals the bigger problem: if we have subtags for variations of the suit, then it becomes a true clusterfuck because we either have a stray Spider-Man (Original Suit) that implies nothing, or we have to make peter parker (comics) (spider-man) (original suit) too (Peter B Parker does not need it because he doesnt have other suits).

And keep in mind, miles morales could appear twice too, as the one from the comic, and the one from the spider-verse movie, because they are technically different characters! This is the main reason why comic characters are a complete clusterfuck.

Another question for post #6482175 is: do we tag unmasked versions as civilians, or not? Do we want a partially unmasked superhero tag? And if yes, do we use civilian or hero identity? Both? I'd lean for "both".


"How do we tag post #10870809?"


"What if someone just wants to find all versions of spider-man?"
This is a three-fold issue, only half of which has merit.

  • The one without merit is wanting to find ALL spider-men, including Spider-Man Noir or Spider-Punk, with the same chartag: the way to search for this is Spider-Man (Series). That's why we have subcopyright tags for Marvel and DC comics. Imagine if someone asked "how do I find for all magical girls including Akemi Homura and Kaname Madoka using a chartag" for Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica.
  • the one that's kinda inbetween is "how do i find all versions of peter-parker". I answered this earlier, we need to figure out if alternate universe versions should be under the same umbrella tag.
  • The one with merit is, "how do i search for a different spider-man in the original red-blue suit?", which is not an uncommon case given that Yamashiro Takuya and a lot of other spider-men including Miles Morales wear it at the start of their stories, especially for one or two starting chapters

While as I mentioned in forum #424233, characters almost never get the original suit, but always develop into a new one, I think the most sensible option here is to look to the ol' reliable cosplay. These ARE cosplay posts after all. When the same suit is being used, it's always either a question of inherited identity (wearing the original superhero's costume before getting a new one), or alternate universe namesake. It would be something similar to the search namesake cosplay, though I'm not sure we want a dedicated subtag, something like borrowed superhero costume or something.

In this case, post #10870809 would end up with

Similarly, miles morales in the original red suit would be

That way you can just do peter parker (spider-man) (original suit) to get the original suit first worn by Peter Parker, and you can optionally add or remove cosplay.

Updated by nonamethanks

PersonalFowl said in forum #432505:

Seems like there's three use cases to care about. Any proposal should ideally hit all three beats.
1. I want Spider-man, any Spider-man
2. I want Peter Parker specifically as Spider-man
3. I want Peter Parker NOT acting as Spider-man.

In my proposal:

1. spider-man (series)
2. peter parker (spider-man)
3. peter parker (civilian)

Also how far would this approach go? Should we rename Harley Quinn to Harleen Quinzelle (Harley Quinn)? If not, why not?

This is another point to iron out. Some characters are not known by their name at all, or rarely appear as civilians.

We could do it either like:

or we could decide on a case by case basis using the notability rule, and go

or we could even do

The last approach is the one that seems the most sensible to me, and the one that we'll likely have to apply to most of the smaller superhero tags. It's easy to rename them if we get a big influx of posts anyway: the civilian tag would already exist, so we'd just do a mass update to create a new tag specifically for the costume and rename the parent tag as appropriate.
As long as each individual character has a single parent chartag where everything else is collected, all further adjustments are easy.

PersonalFowl said in forum #432505:

Seems like there's three use cases to care about. Any proposal should ideally hit all three beats.
1. I want Spider-man, any Spider-man
2. I want Peter Parker specifically as Spider-man
3. I want Peter Parker NOT acting as Spider-man.

Also how far would this approach go? Should we rename Harley Quinn to Harleen Quinzelle (Harley Quinn)? If not, why not?

My proposal would be as follows:

1. spider-man

2. spider-man_(peter_parker), following the same nomenclature as spider-man_(miles_morales)

3. peter_parker

About Harley Quinn, because she doesn't have multiple personas behind the mask and only a few people know her true name I would keep it as Harley_Quinn.

We could create harleen_quinzelle or harley_quinn_(civilian); either of them should be the main alias.

By aliasing marvel_cinematic_universe to marvel (topic #33074), you removed the easiest way to filter by media. Now, to fix your own 'mess', you are proposing over-complicated tags like peter_parker_(civilian)_(mcu).

You are creating thousands of redundant character tags instead of using a simple, modular system. If we kept the Master Tags for heroes and used Series/Version tags as modifiers, we wouldn't need these 'Frankenstein tags'. You are fighting against the very complexity you created when you deleted the MCU tag for the Marvel case.

Mars49 said in forum #432679:

My proposal would be as follows:

1. spider-man

2. spider-man_(peter_parker), following the same nomenclature as spider-man_(miles_morales)

3. peter_parker

About Harley Quinn, because she doesn't have multiple personas behind the mask and only a few people know her true name I would keep it as Harley_Quinn.

We could create harleen_quinzelle or harley_quinn_(civilian); either of them should be the main alias.

The goal is to have a consistent nomenclature. If we already have spider-man_(miles_morales), it is only logical to have spider-man_(peter_parker).

Using the hero name as a Master Tag allows users to find the 'superhero concept' across all versions, which is impossible if we only rely on Series tags (too much noise) or individual civilian names (too much fragmentation).

Mars49 said in forum #432680:

By aliasing marvel_cinematic_universe to marvel (topic #33074), you removed the easiest way to filter by media. Now, to fix your own 'mess', you are proposing over-complicated tags like peter_parker_(civilian)_(mcu).

You are creating thousands of redundant character tags instead of using a simple, modular system. If we kept the Master Tags for heroes and used Series/Version tags as modifiers, we wouldn't need these 'Frankenstein tags'. You are fighting against the very complexity you created when you deleted the MCU tag for the Marvel case.

All of the old Spiderman movies fall under the MCU ever since the Sony merge and the crossover with old Peters. The mcu tag would not have helped at all here. Hell, technically the spider verse is also part of the mcu. The character qualifier is an example, if we don't want to go with earth numbers as qualifiers, which nobody but turbo nerds would know.

An additional point that I forgot to make: we need the real name tag to be the umbrella, not the superhero, because characters can be different superheroes. Even Peter Parker has been Dusk, Captain Universe.... Even Captain America.

Whether we use peter parker (spider-man) or spider-man (peter parker) is indifferent, as long as they imply peter parker and stand along side peter parker (civilian), otherwise we just find ourselves in another mess when we add things like peter parker (captain america).

nonamethanks said in forum #432612:

I can't agree that this is without merit because the Spider-Man (series) tag has over 7k posts, and even counting all the Spiderpeople together that'd still be half the tag which isn't Spider-men. Using just the copytag would give too much noise. I am reminded though of a thought that I had, which relates to your point after;

nonamethanks said in forum #432612:

I think the most sensible option here is to look to the ol' reliable cosplay. These ARE cosplay posts after all. When the same suit is being used, it's always either a question of inherited identity (wearing the original superhero's costume before getting a new one), or alternate universe namesake. It would be something similar to the search namesake cosplay, though I'm not sure we want a dedicated subtag, something like borrowed superhero costume or something.

While I disagree with counting them as cosplay (especially not Yamashiro Takuya, his suit is just seen as a straight adaptation of Peter's suit at the time ala post #10220796's Teenage Peter, which is why they forced a new one on him in the comics recently 47 years after the fact, post #9405371), I think having a subtag for specific superhero costumes would be useful. And I'm not just referring to that borrowed design subtag you just proposed, but also just making a gentag for Spider-Man and Superman costumes. Spidersona would be a subtag for the spider-man costume tag in that case, along with turning Spider-Man (Original Suit) and Spider-Man (Original Black Suit) into gentags so we can still have something for stuff like post #5394242. I would be willing to concede on having the umbrella tag be the real name as opposed to the persona if we had something like that instead.

nonamethanks said in forum #432612:

Another question for post #6482175 is: do we tag unmasked versions as civilians, or not? Do we want a partially unmasked superhero tag? And if yes, do we use civilian or hero identity? Both? I'd lean for "both".

A partially unmasked tag would probably also work outside of superhero costume moments, for stuff like characters depicted after a burglary.

nonamethanks said in forum #432683:

All of the old Spiderman movies fall under the MCU ever since the Sony merge and the crossover with old Peters. The mcu tag would not have helped at all here. Hell, technically the spider verse is also part of the mcu. The character qualifier is an example, if we don't want to go with earth numbers as qualifiers, which nobody but turbo nerds would know.

To emphasize this point, if we wanted to have a way to search for all of Maguire!Spider-Man and Garfield!Spider-Man, we'd need to have a parent copytag for their respective movies, which then means having to figure out what the hell to call them (sam_raimi's_spider-man, marc_webb's_spider-man?) and then having to figure out when to tag them, since you have to decide whether those apply whenever Maguire!Spider-Man and Garfield!Spider-Man are depicted in Spider-Man: No Way Home fanart, and that's without even dealing with the aforementioned point that Holland!Spider-Man's equivalent copytag would be Marvel Cinematic Universe the tag 2.0, which we already dismantled.

And even then, with how the copytags are, we'd have a four-level implication chain eitherway, which we've been moving away from. While the copytags would be useful for ambiguous cases, like someone drawing general fanart of the Raimi movies, everything else is pointing towards just making chartags for them... though then that begs the question for Mary Jane Watson et al.

nonamethanks said in forum #432614:

The last approach is the one that seems the most sensible to me, and the one that we'll likely have to apply to most of the smaller superhero tags. It's easy to rename them if we get a big influx of posts anyway: the civilian tag would already exist, so we'd just do a mass update to create a new tag specifically for the costume and rename the parent tag as appropriate.
As long as each individual character has a single parent chartag where everything else is collected, all further adjustments are easy.

Agreed on this case.

nonamethanks said in forum #432614:

In my proposal:

1. spider-man (series)
...

I must be missing something but saying an umbrella Spider-man char tag doesn't need to exist because Spider-Man (Series) exists is a bit like saying we don't need a Mario char tag because Mario (Series) exists and actually Fire Mario and Propeller Mario are different characters that don't connect in any other way than just Mario (Series). I also find your magical girl example kind of confusing; we're not talking every magical girl in the series or every superhero in the same series, we're talking about the title of "spider-man" itself. Sometimes people care about the title and sometimes people care about the person holding the title, and for superheroes they sometimes care about both.

Lemme put it this way. We know logically that Doomguy from Doom I isn't the same Doomguy from Doom eternal, but we still tag them both as the same Doomguy anyway. They're taken on the title of Doomguy. To people looking at them, they look like the same guy doing the same thing. Well, that logic holds even if they get name dropped. Imagine if we split them up into Doomguy_(doom_1)) and Doomguy_(doom_3) and Doomguy_(doom eternal) etc without an umbrella Doomguy tag. They're completely different people, after all. I mean, the only thing connecting them is that they're all the protagonist in various Doom (Series) games. But that's silly, they've all taken on the title of Doomguy in the same way both Peter Parker and Miles Morales have taken on the title of Spider-Man.

My proposal:

Alias one of these as the other (don't care which)
Peter_parker_(spider-man) <-> spider-man_(peter_parker)

Then do either:
Spider-man_(peter_parker) -> Spider-man
Spider-man_(peter_parker -> Peter_parker
OR
Peter_parker_(spider-man) -> Spider-man
Peter_parker_(spider-man) -> Peter_parker

Then you could slot in Peter_parker_(civilian) -> Peter_parker without any trouble.

IMO, the argument that people search for the 'person' over the 'myth' is flawed. If I search for peter_parker, I expect the civilian aesthetic. If I want the superhero/supervillain, I search for the title/mantle.

Suggesting that reviving the MCU tag would lead to 'turbo nerd' tags like sam_raimi's_spider-man is a strawman argument. We don't need those; we have cross-searching. spider-man + a specific copytag already works. Creating peter_parker_(civilian)_(mcu) is the real 'turbo nerd' move because it creates redundant, long-tail tags that are harder to maintain. Also, given the few results some of those copytags have, you can just use them directly instead of relying on a complex cross-search.

Regarding post #5394242: The tag spider-man_logo already exists (created in 2024), but it only has 11 posts. Just add a rule stating that it should not be used when the full suit is visible.

I agree with partially_unmasked as a purely visual modifier. It solves the 'ambiguity' without forcing a biological implication that pollutes the civilian search results.

Mars49 said in forum #432715:

Suggesting that reviving the MCU tag would lead to 'turbo nerd' tags like sam_raimi's_spider-man is a strawman argument. We don't need those; we have cross-searching. spider-man + a specific copytag already works. Creating peter_parker_(civilian)_(mcu) is the real 'turbo nerd' move because it creates redundant, long-tail tags that are harder to maintain. Also, given the few results some of those copytags have, you can just use them directly instead of relying on a complex cross-search.

I was suggesting the reverse, that creating those specific copytags would result in a move to revive the MCU tag. And again, we'd have a four-layer implication chain in such a scenario (marvel -> spider-man (series) -> sam_raimi's_spider-man -> spider-man 1 (2002)) which by itself eliminates the idea, since we've been pushing to reduce the amount of those.

Regarding post #5394242: The tag spider-man_logo already exists (created in 2024), but it only has 11 posts. Just add a rule stating that it should not be used when the full suit is visible.

Don't focus on the fact it's a logo, focus on the fact that it is a representation of the mask, which is often the most similar think between Spider-men. How would you deal with post #6378493?

Damian0358 said in forum #432716:

I was suggesting the reverse, that creating those specific copytags would result in a move to revive the MCU tag. And again, we'd have a four-layer implication chain in such a scenario (marvel -> spider-man (series) -> sam_raimi's_spider-man -> spider-man 1 (2002)) which by itself eliminates the idea, since we've been pushing to reduce the amount of those.

Don't focus on the fact it's a logo, focus on the fact that it is a representation of the mask, which is often the most similar think between Spider-men. How would you deal with post #6378493?

Some points:
1. Regarding sam_raimi's_spider-man tag. I mistook it for a character tag when it was a copytag in your example.
2. Following your logic, it's better to leave marvel_cinematic_universe out then if we want to avoid a fourth-layer implication, as we can't make it a general tag either.
3 In post #6378493 I would use spider-man_(cosplay), spidersona is debatable, but leave it if you prefer. Or if the BUR is approved, should we use other_(spider-man) as a chartag in this and other edge cases?
4. Should spidersona be a child of spider-man_(series)/spider-man? I ask because all spidersona posts have spider-man and spider-man_(series) tags.
5. Should spider-man_logo be a child of spider-man_(series)? I ask in case someone wants them in the general result of the search.
6. In the case the BUR is approved, should we use spider-man_(costume) for the cases where it is not a cosplay (since it's a canon character)? That way, we would still be able to search for all instances of Spider-Man.
7. Points 4 and 5 are probably for later.
8. Regarding my point 4 if the BUR is approved, is a spidersona a spider-man or not?

1 2 3 4