post #9834176 (NSFW)
I'm contemplating whether I should add straddling, kneeling, bent over, or a combination of the three.
Posted under Tags
post #9834176 (NSFW)
I'm contemplating whether I should add straddling, kneeling, bent over, or a combination of the three.
How to describe this internal data ocean-like environment?
Myth-of-Stars said:
post #9834176 (NSFW)
I'm contemplating whether I should add straddling, kneeling, bent over, or a combination of the three.
I think straddling and bent over.
Kneeling would need her to have her two knees on a surface or someone.
Is there a tag for artworks tinted in specific color (in this case red)?
And if not, should I tag elements of the artwork that have their color heavily changed as the original color or the new one (for example here hair is normally black, but due to the tint it is very much red)
Minitajfun said:
Is there a tag for artworks tinted in specific color (in this case red)?
<color>_theme, in this case red theme.
post #9839033
Are there tags for characters pulling their clothes forward? Is it still 'pulling own clothes' or is there a more specific tag?
magcolo said:
field cap seems like the most accurate tag.
In post #9840789, official merchandise (1, 2) is depicted. Should the tag omocat be added, or should a copyright tag omocat_(studio) be created instead? The studio has more than one illustrator.
anonbl said:
In post #9840789, official merchandise (1, 2) is depicted. Should the tag omocat be added, or should a copyright tag omocat_(studio) be created instead? The studio has more than one illustrator.
I don't think Omocat should be added unless they're the artist of the picture,
seems like merchandise is more fitting here.
post #9556008 (very NSFW)
I'm curious about how gender tagging would be handled in head swap posts like this. It shows a boy's head surgically attached to a woman's headless body. The character is currently tagged as 1girl, which seems reasonable, but I'm wondering whether the fact his head is still 100% male should be taken into consideration. Maybe it could just be handled by just adding gender transitioning and genderswap (mtf)? And would it be okay to tag it as hetero, or is that going to upset some people looking for hetero stuff?
Or maybe we'd make it 2boys and add male with breasts and cuntboy?
I realize this is a very weird case.
Edit: Looks like post #9556034 took the 2boys and genderswap (mtf) option.
Fate genderswap shenanigans, but I'm not sure if I should tag post #9833210 as arthur_pendragon_(fate) or mysterious_heroine_xx_(fate) or even mysterious_heroine_x_(fate) with genderswap_(ftm) since the caption says 謎のヒーローX(水着) (Mysterious Hero X (Swimsuit))
I didn't add any of the Mysterious Heroine X tags since unlike post #2849106 for example, the outfit feels way too different.
siraco said:
Fate genderswap shenanigans, but I'm not sure if I should tag post #9833210 as arthur_pendragon_(fate) or mysterious_heroine_xx_(fate) or even mysterious_heroine_x_(fate) with genderswap_(ftm) since the caption says 謎のヒーローX(水着) (Mysterious Hero X (Swimsuit))
I didn't add any of the Mysterious Heroine X tags since unlike post #2849106 for example, the outfit feels way too different.
Aside from the blue baseball cap, that outfit doesn't resemble any of MHX/MHXX official costumes so I'd personally go with Arthur Pendragon (Fate) swimsuit alternate costume
Updated by user 1342552
How do I tag intentionally rotated drawing by the artist themselves, not a third party? Like here: post #9847055
rotated seems to be for third-party edits.
USERGORE said:
How do I tag intentionally rotated drawing by the artist themselves, not a third party? Like here: post #9847055
rotated seems to be for third-party edits.
The wiki for rotated says it's usually for third-party edits, but there are a lot of examples under the tag of the artist themselves rotating an image. Though, I couldn't find a non-rotated version of the image, so I think sideways would apply better.
Should I put optical illusion for this, or is there a more specific tag?
post #6864829, post #4005626 (first on the left)
What are these absurdly puffy shorts that are neither bloomers nor puffy shorts?
magcolo said:
post #6864829, post #4005626 (first on the left)
What are these absurdly puffy shorts that are neither bloomers nor puffy shorts?
I'd still tag them bloomers.
post #9851592 We have upper body and lower body, but what about when the art is focused on the mid-section?