post #1400460 - probably should just be child since it's not even remotely sexual
Posted under General
post #1400460 - probably should just be child since it's not even remotely sexual
post #1438325
I don't see the shota, piixiv tag say nothing about shota
post #1464113 may be incorrectly tagged as shota. The from_behind tag is incorrect as the view of the character is from above and not behind him The yaoi tag is also wrong.
Seems pretty suggestive to me, I'm just not sure it's explicit enough for a loli tag.
NeverGonnaGive said:
Not loli.
post #908449
post #777657 - tagged ロリ on Pixiv
Technically safe, but a very "come-hither" pose on a 13 year old who looks younger (and is wearing a randoseru).
She's fully clothed in a fitting bikini. The pose is provocative, yes, but not nearly as much as post #1467752.
post #1405391
Panties (or Buruma) down on the hips, definitely with child-like proportions, and of course, topless.
Then again, there seems to be a comical element here, from what I can tell, and I'm not sure that sexuality is the main focus here. It's a lovely picture, and it'd be a shame to see it wrongly hidden from a good number of the site's users, but I leave it to the judgement of others.
I usually try to put myself in the shoes of an outsider when judging loli, but even I think you'd have to be a real hardass to label post #1405391 loli. I say no.
Plenty of T&A there. Being canonically loli-aged (at least when she has that hairdo) doesn't matter, does it?
Do fully clothed posts like this post #86549 amd post #83674 count as loli?
Also, why is post #84130 explicit? Those are only cute panties I see.
Then I believe post #136572 and post #136574 don't count either?