post #1605770 - She is bottomless, but nothing is seen, and the image isn't sexual in nature.
Posted under General
post #1605770 - She is bottomless, but nothing is seen, and the image isn't sexual in nature.
post #1618620 - not sure if loli or not, their breasts sizes are something between, need help
post #1618621 - the same
Updated by HNTI
pool #8048 - Chibified little girls bathing. Though not yet translated, there certainly doesn't seem to be anything explicit involved (besides quite the creative kancho, of course).
post #1651876 - Natsume_Rin is usually not loli, and her lower body looks fairly post-pubescent to me.
aneroph93 said:
Considering other pictures from the artist it is a loli, but since you can't really tell without context we could remove the tag here. Could, not should.
post #1681943
tagged it loli without thinking, but when I did consider it, it's a pretty normal composition, and not sexually suggestive in any way. What is more, the context is a pool that is clearly not for the loli tag
Borrator said:
post #1681943
tagged it loli without thinking, but when I did consider it, it's a pretty normal composition, and not sexually suggestive in any way. What is more, the context is a pool that is clearly not for the loli tag
It's hardly sexual at all (just Mami regressing physically and oversized clothes) so not needed.
Kikimaru said:
post #1698668
loli?
Yes, just look at the face.
There are some posts changed by MichaelSan1980 that are in need of fixing due to inappropriate loli/shota tags. Someone with a decent grasp of the guidelines should probably PM him as well.
Kikimaru said:
No.
post #1710447
Does an image still warrants the loli tag if a clearly preadolescent character is fully clothed while preforming an sexual action without direct contact? In this paticular case an artificial vagina.