post #1334226: Her hips really widen out at the bottom of the image, so I'm inclined to say she's petite.
Posted under General
post #1334226: Her hips really widen out at the bottom of the image, so I'm inclined to say she's petite.
post #1335989
Kind of borderline for me.
Ars said:
post #1335779
Not remotely explicit enough, in my opinion. Removed.
saizo0070 said:
post #1335989
Kind of borderline for me.
Shouldn't be; that image is in no way explicit, so it wouldn't qualify for the tag regardless of her figure.
Ars said:
post #1335779
Aside of what sgcdonmai said, she also has sizable breasts as far as I can see.
Also, I agree with both points from jjj14's post (forum #82623).
post #1341646 Just double checking
post #1341832
The cameltoe got me to wondering.
If it were a crotch shot I would be hesitant, but the cameltoe in post #1341832 is so mild that I would even rate it Safe.
Could this set of images be considered for the loli tag?
******GURO WARNING*******
post #1342368
post #1342369
******GURO WARNING*******
Because it features one of the artist's previous work post #1164505 although being small, it is still present.
Updated by Table
Next time leave a warning that the posts contain a quadruple amputee with bloody, bandaged stumps. I don't really care since I'm desensitized to pretty much everything these days, but others aren't as tolerant.
As for the question, I'm inclined to say no since it's minor, but truth be told I'm not sure what we do with small "cameo" loli pics. Probably would like an admin to clear the air.
Updated by Hillside Moose
i think this is both safe and not loli. just asking first before modifying anything.