ANON_TOKYO said in forum #435511:
Please don't ever use the fact that it happened once as an argument for something. There's dozens of approvers, with many, many more contributors. Just because one of them let something bypass the queue that shouldn't have isn't an argument for anything. Someone made a mistake, and someone else has yet to come by to correct it. Sometimes there's ai-generated art active, that doesn't mean there is any reason to suddenly argue to start allowing it.
Appreciate the response. Seems my point was misunderstood or I wasn't clear, so to clarify: I wasn't arguing that the posts uploaded by snowpiercer should be allowed because an approver uploaded similar content. My point was that, from my pov at least, enforcement appears inconsistent.
If hard-translated posts are discouraged it should apply uniformly regardless of who uploads them. I was highlighting the inconsistency, not using it as justification for the deletions.

