#6144077
#6133697
Posted under General
#6144077
#6133697
why this yaoi bdsm artist has 71 deleted out of 88 posts? that's a crazy high ratio even considering the older/crappier works
post #10490340
post #10517630
post #11152623post #10955446
post #10662020
post #10944924
Updated by trapster77
This post seems similar in quality to the artist's other approved posts, so what makes this one in particular deletion-worthy?
I know the anatomy in these is heavily stylized, but that shouldn't be an inherent disqualification. Is there something else I'm missing about these posts that makes them bad enough to be deleted?
Danbooruvisiter said in forum #434371:
I’m unsure why some of my uploads keep getting deleted even though they were reviewed by many approvers. Posts like post #11175807, post #11033432, and post #11033483 each were reviewed by 15 approvers yet they got deleted due to being “unapproved in 3 days” and I’m really not sure why.
Hentai or any lewd fanart has a smaller chance of approvals due to reasons, regular fan art has a better chance of getting approved
Could somebody help me appeal post #11022526 ?
I tried to appeal the post 25 days ago but it was still got rejected at that time.
Personally speaking,I think the overall quality of the post is good enough to get a second chance,and even if there are minor errors,it did not undermine the overall quality.
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #434785:
Could somebody help me appeal post #11022526 ?
I tried to appeal the post 25 days ago but it was still got rejected at that time.Personally speaking,I think the overall quality of the post is good enough to get a second chance,and even if there are minor errors,it did not undermine the overall quality.
So I just received a mail from the approvers that I should not ungroup the parenting of post #11022526 ,but when I attempted to regroup them,I found out that the post had its parenting again.Did somebody did it before I did ?
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #434852:
So I just received a mail from the approvers that I should not ungroup the parenting of post #11022526 ,but when I attempted to regroup them,I found out that the post had its parenting again.Did somebody did it before I did ?
Yes, and it was probably the same one that DMailed you about it. Why were you even unparenting them in the first place?
Blank_User said in forum #434854:
Yes, and it was probably the same one that DMailed you about it. Why were you even unparenting them in the first place?
I thought the parent had the best resolution and probably had the best chance of being appealed or approved. Next time I would not unparenting them.
post #11105848 (Q) (I appreciate it.)
This one had even gotten a Poor Quality judgment, which was a surprise.
Updated by StarfishAtLarge
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #434856:
I thought the parent had the best resolution and probably had the best chance of being appealed or approved. Next time I would not unparenting them.
That doesn't really explain anything. The one with the higher resolution was already the parent. I genuinely don't understand what thought process would lead you to believe removing the parent-child relationships entirely would improve that post's chances of being approved.
Blank_User said in forum #434860:
That doesn't really explain anything. The one with the higher resolution was already the parent. I genuinely don't understand what thought process would lead you to believe removing the parent-child relationships entirely would improve that post's chances of being approved.
I see,next time I would not remove the parent-child relationships of the posts.
As for the thought process,I was not thinking much and just wanted to try everything I thought that “might” improve the chance of the post being approved.
Updated by Mr.Ritsuka
post #11200355 (Q)
post #11200356 (Q)
post #11200357 (E)
These are variants of a post that was insta-approved by NNT himself, so I thought they would be fine. The art quality seems about similar to the initial post to me. Was I mistaken?
Anyone have any feedback as to why Emilou Apacci's "Segunda Etapa" sketch from Rakusakugk was not approved?
Recently found this set of Ishtar fan arts drawn by the artist “alter (kxk7357)” on Pixiv. I do think the overall quality of both the parent post and its child post is fine(Which means I think it is overall quite watchable and even if some anatomical errors exists,they were not serious enough to greatly undermine the quality of the art) and consistent with the artist’s style,or at least the artist’s earlier style in the 2019s. However,after I posted them on the site,the Fate/Grand Order section was later soon overflowed with uploads by contributors,would the pending queue be affected by this ? Or it is mostly unaffected ?
In addition,as a great Fan of FGO Ishtar, I often upload fan arts of her that were drawn in previous years. Some of them are successfully approved,others did not. Some of the arts were closer to earlier styles of the artists,which were not necessarily perfect or developed at that time. But still personally regard them as hidden gems.
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #434889:
[...]
You posted those just seven hours ago; you've been told to only list deleted posts here before. Seven hours isn't nearly enough time for all the approvers to see your posts; they may get approved yet.
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #434889:
However,after I posted them on the site,the Fate/Grand Order section was later soon overflowed with uploads by contributors,would the pending queue be affected by this ? Or it is mostly unaffected ?
Contributor uploads bypass the queue entirely so it's unaffected.
post #11149097
post #11192502
post #11193008
post #11200754
post #11200781
post #11200847
post #11200855
post #11200922
Why were these posts not deleted? Especially the first one here, which is an variation of an approved post.
What exactly makes a post "low quality?" I've had tons of mine deleted but no one ever actually gives a discernible reason to why.
