Posted under Tags
nonamethanks said in forum #426018:
What about just a gyarufication tag for characters taking on gyaru traits they don't normally have?
I mean, we already have bimbofication, so the precedent's there. I'm fine with it.
Whatever the case, gyaru_bulbasaur should imply bulbasaur. If it was supposed to be for any gyaru Pokémon, then it wouldn't be a character tag, much less one that mentions a specific mon.
AngryZapdos said in forum #426071:
I mean, we already have bimbofication, so the precedent's there. I'm fine with it.
That might already be the tag to use then, don't think we need two tags for the same thing. Maybe an utility alias.
Not all the Pokopia Pokemon are gyaru. Ara-Ara Venusaur is a THICC MILF, for example. Gyaru just happens to be popular now that the creatures have personalities.
Thinking about it, most of these can be searched with pokemon_pokopia personification. These personification tags were created by tag maximalists.
Hillside_Moose said in forum #426174:
Not all the Pokopia Pokemon are gyaru. Ara-Ara Venusaur is a THICC MILF, for example. Gyaru just happens to be popular now that the creatures have personalities.
Thinking about it, most of these can be searched with pokemon_pokopia personification. These personification tags were created by tag maximalists.
Yeah, shouldn't character tags be reserved for licensed media or artists' original characters? Unless some artist out there has named or otherwise defined their Venusaur personification, I would say that a new character tag just for it is unnecessary.
Unless someone out there wants to go through each artists' interpretation of the personification and make tags/update them accordingly (?)
