FGO requests

BUR #54371 has been approved by @evazion.

remove alias enkidu_(fate/strange_fake) -> enkidu_(fate)

Comes up before Fate/Strange Fake itself in auto-complete, outnumbering it by a few hundred posts.

The bulk update request #54371 (forum #416711) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #54138 (forum #415970) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #54082 (forum #415791) has been rejected by @evazion.

The bulk update request #54085 (forum #415810) has been rejected by @evazion.

Ylimegirl said in forum #416711:

BUR #54371 has been approved by @evazion.

remove alias enkidu_(fate/strange_fake) -> enkidu_(fate)

Comes up before Fate/Strange Fake itself in auto-complete, outnumbering it by a few hundred posts.

I've said this a few times before but Enkidu himself is heavily polluting FSF search results. Well, the entire Fate has this problem, it's been brought up countless times, not expecting it to be solved any time soon.

magcolo said in forum #417058:

I've said this a few times before but Enkidu himself is heavily polluting FSF search results. Well, the entire Fate has this problem, it's been brought up countless times, not expecting it to be solved any time soon.

Oh yes, p much every non-FGO Fate copytag has this problem. I've tried to tackle it a few times before I get distracted by another project again. Try searching the two-tags of Fate/Grand Order + literally any other Fate property if you want something to garden if I don't loop back around to it in the next few months. Have fun!

BUR #54459 has been rejected.

forum #389054
Since there isn't a particular reason for this format.

I think the format of these tags can be simplified. The current format is wordy, hard to read and makes the tag longer. And it's unnecessary. Almost every other collaboration tag only use (collaboration) as the qualifier, despite technically they can all be named (copyright x collaboration). FGO is the only one going by this "copyright x collaboration" format. Take Lawson for example, most tags are *_(lawson)*, not *_(copyright_x_lawson)*.

Also, all existing Fate Lawson tags are FGO tags. If someone is worried about future FSN x Lawson, FE x Lawson tags etc., my opinion is that no need to worry before that becomes a thing. Re-qualifying a tag is not difficult, and we will only need to qualify confronting tags, e.g. a character appearing in both collaborations. Otherwise, there's no difference if both FGO x Lawson and FSN x Lawson characters use the (lawson) qualifier.

BUR #54461 has been approved by @evazion.

I also think adding year qualifiers to every character is overkill. Only repeated characters need year qualifiers. Every time I look at these tags they give me the feeling of confusion that every character has multiple outfits, even when I know they don't. If we only add year qualifier to repeated characters, then it's very straightforward who has multiple outfits. Fate costume tags and character wikis are already puzzling enough, no need to overcomplicate things more.

magcolo said in forum #417058:

I've said this a few times before but Enkidu himself is heavily polluting FSF search results. Well, the entire Fate has this problem, it's been brought up countless times, not expecting it to be solved any time soon.

When a character goes on to appear in multiple games, we should stop tagging which game they originated in unless it's a specific reference to that game. See how Touhou characters aren't tagged according to which game they first appeared in.

Hassan of Serenity and Suzuka Gozen are especially bad about this because they add 2-3 extra copytags to every post they appear in due to long implication chains (e.g. Fate/Extra CCC Fox Tail -> Fate/Extra CCC -> Fate/Extra -> Fate).

BUR #54514 has been rejected.

rename saber_(empire_of_dirt) -> liu_xiu_(fate/empire_of_dirt)

I'm like 85% certain these are dupe tags. Users who can look at banned posts pls confirm

Ylimegirl said in forum #417252:

BUR #54514 has been rejected.

rename saber_(empire_of_dirt) -> liu_xiu_(fate/empire_of_dirt)

I'm like 85% certain these are dupe tags. Users who can look at banned posts pls confirm

The former is this character, while the latter is this character. They aren't dupes, but they are confusingly named, based on these VNDB entries.

The bulk update request #54514 (forum #417252) has been rejected by @Ylimegirl.

BUR #54517 has been approved by @evazion.

rename saber_(empire_of_dirt) -> rider_(fate/empire_of_dirt)

Aight, let's do this then.

there also seems to be a banned result under fate/empire_of_dirt paracelsus_von_hohenheim_(fate) and i have no clue if that's right in terms of chartag or copytag or what but i digress

Ylimegirl said in forum #417270:

there also seems to be a banned result under fate/empire_of_dirt paracelsus_von_hohenheim_(fate) and i have no clue if that's right in terms of chartag or copytag or what but i digress

The character in question seems to be this one, and it appears to be a mistag dating back to 2017?

Damian0358 said in forum #417274:

The character in question seems to be this one, and it appears to be a mistag dating back to 2017?

Figured it was something like that. Guy's actual name is Li Bai but we could just call him Assassin (Fate/Empire of Dirt) probably

BUR #54520 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication typhon_neos_(fate) -> typhon_(fate)

The second alternative version of Typhon that is a boss in their debut event. This version of Typhon appears in the Noble Phantasm of Typhon Epsilon, rather than the original version like in Typhon Ephemeros's version.

BUR #54528 has been approved by @evazion.

rename cao_cao_(fetc) -> cao_cao_(fate/embrace_the_chaos)
rename liu_bei_(fetc) -> liu_bei_(fate/embrace_the_chaos)

what kinda qualifier is this

also I think there are some other mistagged posts hiding under fate/empire_of_dirt status:banned and i can't do anything abt it :( i would check shuten_douji_(fate) fate/empire_of_dirt (potentially their version of ushi gozen) / jeanne_d'arc_(fate) fate/empire_of_dirt (probably the charles VII Berserker pseudo-servant, either way jeanne_d'arc_(ruler)_(fate) fate/empire_of_dirt is almost certainly wrong)

The bulk update request #54520 (forum #417290) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #54528 (forum #417326) has been approved by @evazion.