How do I tag this?

Freshblink said:

In this specific context, no.

LightSolas said:

It's not gay if the dicks are touching inside a girl.

(In other words, no, it's not bisexual male.)

I see then, thank you two.

The name for the accessory on her forehead is skipping my mind. post #10404605

Placeholder1996 said:

The name for the accessory on her forehead is skipping my mind. post #10404605

Hair rollers

czernin said:

Hair rollers

thanks

Myth-of-Stars said:

post #10395294 (Nsfw)

I'm confused, I thought the post with the highest size is suppose to be the parent post, at least, that's what I've read from the wiki, but then someone changed it to child instead and tagged duplicate on it even though it's higher sized. I removed it but then I put it back because I'm not so sure if I'm wrong here. Is the duplicate tag correct? Or should I undo the changes?

PS: I went ahead and changed it back since from my own experience, I've seen two posts with the same picture but one of them became the parent post even though it was only slighty higher size before: post #10348016 (nsfw).

PPS: Aaand it was immediately reverted back to be the child again. Can anyone explain to me why? I don't think it should be the child post according to the wiki, but I also don't want to get into a tagging war.

@Myth-of-Stars ping since it's been a bit since your question. Highest size refers to higher resolution, not larger file size. In this case, your post does have a bigger file size, but that's just the difference in how the websites compress images and videos. They have the same resolution and they're the same file format, so your post is a duplicate. If the resolution was higher, then it wouldn't be a duplicate.

Placeholder1996 said:

@Myth-of-Stars ping since it's been a bit since your question. Highest size refers to higher resolution, not larger file size. In this case, your post does have a bigger file size, but that's just the difference in how the websites compress images and videos. They have the same resolution and they're the same file format, so your post is a duplicate. If the resolution was higher, then it wouldn't be a duplicate.

I see, thank you for your response. I actually did my own research afterwords and found other posts that were duplicate despite having a larger filesize either due to jpeg artifacts or some other criteria. I also did a side-by-side comparison of the twitter version and the bsky version of the two posts and found that the bsky has more artifacts than the twitter version. I'm so used to getting one-up'd by bsky posts that have the same resolution as twitter posts that I thought it was because of the file size. I see where I went wrong now.

post #10405440

Do we got any tag for this sort of situation where a character is surrounded by fangirls/boys? I don't think the harem tag is correct here...

For the situation in post #10408458, if the girl underneath is focused on masturbating to the girl having sex with a boy on top of her, does it count as yuri or bisexual female?

post #10364481
I haven't played the games and I don't know the names of the characters.

Placeholder1996 said:

I could have sworn I read on one of the two_many wikis that 5 or more was the qualification for the tag, but I can’t find it now. Edit, it’s the wiki for too many rabbits. There’s also flock to consider for birds.

Interesting, but then if you go on too many butterflies it becomes "too many [...] to reasonably count" and I can pretty reasonably count to 9 (it gets a little tough when I start running out of fingers, but I persevere).
Other too_many tags have stuff like "any sizable collection" or "a really huge number". It's a bit all over the place.
6+ could be consistent IMO, because then at least it's in line with 6+girls and 6+boys.
I think that particular image is also flock. I wonder as well if flock should imply too_many_birds (though definitely not the other way round).

Myth-of-Stars said:

For the situation in post #10408458, if the girl underneath is focused on masturbating to the girl having sex with a boy on top of her, does it count as yuri or bisexual female?

That image should definitely be tagged as an ffm threesome which is never yuri, and is only bisexual female if the two girls are sexually interacting with each other. I'd tag that one as bisexual female.

what do you call this superimposition-like background of the same image post #10411094

ForeskinThief said:

what do you call this superimposition-like background of the same image post #10411094

Zoom layer.

CoreMack said:

That image should definitely be tagged as an ffm threesome which is never yuri, and is only bisexual female if the two girls are sexually interacting with each other. I'd tag that one as bisexual female.

Got it, thanks.

To double check, if I'm making a tag for a character from a fan work that needs qualified, should I use the name of the fanwork or the main series? The character in question is Ms. Citizen (Warhammer 40K) from the fan made 40K web comic Krieg on Paradise World, the comic in question doesn't have a copy tag.

The artifacts here look like adversarial noise, but I'm not certain. post #10352473

Placeholder1996 said:

The artifacts here look like adversarial noise, but I'm not certain. post #10352473

Yes.

I am not crazy to not see any of the following tags white_panties underwear panties in the image post #10413964, right?
(I already edited, just want to know if that was right.)

Weisskralle said:

I am not crazy to not see any of the following tags white_panties underwear panties on the image post #10413964, right?
(I already edited, just want to know if that was right.)

Didn't see any panties in that image. The uploader probably wanted to type white pants instead, but made a typo.

CommentaryRequest said:

Didn't see any panties in that image. The uploader probably wanted to type white pants instead, but made a typo.

It's a mistag that happens occasionally. It may be because white panties autocompletes before white pants since it has more posts.