Elfaleon said:
Not really the correct thread for this, but the 1st one looks better to me.
Thanks.
Posted under General
Part of a story
These were posts that were re-uploaded from pixiv samples. Why weren't these approved when the samples were?
post #2543815
post #2543816
post #2543818
post #2543820
Chimera99 said:
post #2538773 & the other parent/child of this image.
Not sure about the first one. Too sketchy-like? The second one has a girl that looks more like a shiny plastic doll complete with doll joints than a real human. And the third one has those skinny long arms and a overly long torso.
Chimera99 said:
Part of a story
Must be the squished head.
CronaBaka said:
These were posts that were re-uploaded from pixiv samples. Why weren't these approved when the samples were?
post #2543815
post #2543816
post #2543818
post #2543820
Her back doesn't look curved right? Not sure.
post #2300063
Can't see any off facial structures on this one.
post #2357245
Reasoning in the comments
Updated by MaskedAvenger
post #2544273 and child I'd like to get feedback about.
Flandre5carlet said:
post #2544273 and child I'd like to get feedback about.
Sort of half done, like a doodle. Many doujins have proper framing and sharper lineart, so its not unexpected this would be ignored. Hands are a bit too scratchy for the liking in the second.
Chimera99 said:
Some really lo-res foreground textures on the background objects and some confusing shadows being cast on Sakuya and the couch. It's definitely not the worst MMD, but the lower quality models really detract from the focus (which is pretty acceptable IMO).
I think my upload/approval ratio is fairly decent, but I just wanted to check in with some of my older uploads that didn't make the cut, so I can understand what better to do as an uploader.
post #2537065
post #2537401
post #2537789
post #2547190
post #2549796
There are some that I believe were deleted for obvious reasons after looking, such as:
post #2537558 (Her body/muscle is just a strange anatomical anomaly)
post #2548188 (deceivingly low quality, her shoulders are just really off, and the clavicle cuts in way too deep)
post #2548207 (one breast looks bigger than the other)
post #2549766 (exposure is way too high on this, painful to look at -- although the child is probably acceptable)
But yes, if anyone can offer me some feedback I would much appreciate it. Thank you.
Ricetaffy said:
I think my upload/approval ratio is fairly decent, but I just wanted to check in with some of my older uploads that didn't make the cut, so I can understand what better to do as an uploader.
post #2537065
post #2537401
post #2537789
post #2547190
post #2549796There are some that I believe were deleted for obvious reasons after looking, such as:
post #2537558 (Her body/muscle is just a strange anatomical anomaly)
post #2548188 (deceivingly low quality, her shoulders are just really off, and the clavicle cuts in way too deep)
post #2548207 (one breast looks bigger than the other)
post #2549766 (exposure is way too high on this, painful to look at -- although the child is probably acceptable)But yes, if anyone can offer me some feedback I would much appreciate it. Thank you.
A lot of the first 5 are borderline, but I decided to approve the third one since it isn't particularly flawed. Your uploading has been really high quality, so the last bit remains what sort of content you're putting up in terms of content. Explicit sometimes has a harder time of being approved simply cause it's not really the kind of stuff many approvers look for, especially when its generic porn. Try a higher mixture of the stuff getting approved already, and avoid too many explicit artworks and that should help. Your quality standards are already pretty solid, and you're noticing when the flaws are too extreme, so you're pretty much good to go.
buehbueh said:
A lot of the first 5 are borderline, but I decided to approve the third one since it isn't particularly flawed. Your uploading has been really high quality, so the last bit remains what sort of content you're putting up in terms of content. Explicit sometimes has a harder time of being approved simply cause it's not really the kind of stuff many approvers look for, especially when its generic porn. Try a higher mixture of the stuff getting approved already, and avoid too many explicit artworks and that should help. Your quality standards are already pretty solid, and you're noticing when the flaws are too extreme, so you're pretty much good to go.
Thank you for approving that, and I really appreciate the feedback. I worry about this because it seems that the daily upload limit I have takes quite a big hit anytime an upload fails to make it though. It seems that my actual deletion rate is not that high at all (4-5% ish) but the formula seems to skew it really high.
One thing I always try to do though, and I'm not sure if it may have an impact on my uploads, is groom all of them the best that I can -- I tag them to the best of my knowledge, I translate the text if possible, and often times I'll also provide the commentary if it's short enough I can provide one briefly. Even in the case that it might not help, I'll still continue to do it anyway, since I don't want to be a lazy uploader regarding my own posts.
I actually have a huge backlog of images I want to upload that I think everyone would like, but I do understand it gets pretty difficult sometimes... Regardless though, I'll continue this trend because I've sort of made uploading a habit now given the amount of content I skim through on pixiv and Twitter.
Anyways, I'm yammering on but again thanks for the feedback, I really appreciate it.
Apologies for being a bit intrusive since this isn't my upload but I was curious as to why post #2273467 was deleted. I noticed it when adding images to pool #11805 off Grande's twitter account.
I think it looks okay for the most part, but maybe a mod could come and take another look?
EDIT: Should've probably said this in the deletion appeals thread...
EDIT 2: Seems to be restored, apologies
Updated by .grey