blindVigil said:
That's really not how their comment reads to me. It reads like they're saying that furry content should be criticized, and it's hypocritical that they criticize loli/shota but glorify furry.
But that point doesn't make any sense if both kinks are harmless. If furry is harmless, then why use it as an example of hypocrisy? It's not a double standard if there's nothing wrong with the kink.
Maybe it was about the fact neither kids nor animals can give consent in real life? They may be conflating furries with zoophiles.