I'm glad BB's humor/satire still exists and confuses the masses on whether it's supporting and/or mocking something.
17
Reply
Regardless of this artist's actual position in this whole thing,
You can't be performatively horny about lolis. Ever. Not in current_year, not in the near nor far future by the looks of things (I'd be very amazed to be proven wrong on this), not before covid brought in the worst of the worst group of people into anime/manga discourse, and certainly not in the 2000s when there was little to no point in being performative on the internet about anything anyways.
And not even in "the mystical land of Far-Eastern Gacha Slop", where some JP feminists (aka ツイフェミ) have become increasingly louder and louder and would throw pedophilia accusations around just as any random English-speaking xitter users would, like they're mere playground insults (well they are now unfortunately). Where every week day that very "mystical land" keeps getting called Diddy/Epstein island because of loli characters, the actual nationalities of the aforementioned two individuals notwithstanding.
Hell, even this very site isn't exactly immune to it.
Yeah sure some people would call you safe horny or whatever if you're into "dommy-mommy-please-break-my-pelvis" or whatever, but those are negligible at best, and annoying at worst. You'd have to kid yourself if you think being called that is in any way comparable to saying openly that you're into loli, even performatively (again, if that's even a thing).
Fhtagn said in comment #2588347:
Regardless of this artist's actual position in this whole thing,
You can't be performatively horny about lolis. Ever. Not in
current_year, not in the near nor far future by the looks of things (I'd be very amazed to be proven wrong on this), not before covid brought in the worst of the worst group of people into anime/manga discourse, and certainly not in the 2000s when there was little to no point in being performative on the internet about anything anyways.And not even in "the mystical land of Far-Eastern Gacha Slop", where some JP feminists (aka ツイフェミ) have become increasingly louder and louder and would throw pedophilia accusations around just as any random English-speaking xitter users would, like they're mere playground insults (well they are now unfortunately). Where every
weekday that very "mystical land" keeps getting called Diddy/Epstein island because of loli characters, the actual nationalities of the aforementioned two individuals notwithstanding.Hell, even this very site isn't exactly immune to it.
Yeah sure some people would call you safe horny or whatever if you're into "dommy-mommy-please-break-my-pelvis" or whatever, but those are negligible at best, and annoying at worst. You'd have to kid yourself if you think being called that is in any way comparable to saying openly that you're into loli, even performatively (again, if that's even a thing).
what are you on about man
exileman said in comment #2590984:
what are you on about man
The more I **TRY** to read the comment, the less I get what is it supposed to tell so uh...
Also Hikari and Nozomi really have put Justine and Caroline from Persona 5 into the jail of forgotten past similar characters.
exileman said in comment #2590984:
what are you on about man
The pic says "I will now be performatively horny about these GAKI", and (whether this line was made in jest or not) I made a reply about how no one can ever be performatively horny about gaki characters (and by extension, loli characters).
SUnown said in comment #2588459:
@Tasty_power_move: similar thrills to riding a rollercoaster or watching a good B horror movie.
Thats a real concise and pretty goddamn informative analogy you just gave. Thank you very much for your perspective. It fucking punched me in the dick with enlightenment.
Updated by Tasty power move
Tasty_power_move said in comment #2588266:
Why IS violence so present in the majority of accessible sexual fantasies?
A better question would be why is violence present PERIOD?
Bare in mind that a lot of the "gushing" over such works of fiction are more just to be spiteful and get a rise from those they deem as normal. And doesn't have to be sexual violence; they gush over ANY violence (at least as their online personas).
If you want to understand violence, you need to separate it from sex. Otherwise, I'm sensing this is another fruitless search for a convenient boogieman where there isn't one, just like ever other anti-porn crusade over the centuries. Human nature isn't so simple, neither is violence.
AlsoSprachOdin2 said in comment #2588399:
It helps tickle the overstimulated (women's literature is largely porn, and even more raunchy than it used to be) female libido, which does inherently appreciate dominant and physically powerful men. Such violence is one way of showing not telling such qualities. And fear is next to arousal.
For a lot of men it appeals to frustrations with women.
Just my guess.
Tasty_power_move said in comment #2588266:
Why IS violence so present in the majority of accessible sexual fantasies? Not even a gender thing. I've read plenty of romantasy reviews where they gush about how the Main Girl lead got essentially raped by the CEO MAFIA BOSS while she was sleeping. And that it's somehow "Romantic"
Is it something to do with the desire to be dominant, and domination being closely tied to power, therefore Violence? And what is with the desire to be dominated in the first place? Is it evolutionary?? Why do our brains sometimes say "Yes it feels good to just give up my autonomy."
Not even getting into the Schadenfreude that is NTR...Shits fucked. BaalBuddy meme gave me post-nut clarity without even nutting.
It's not a "violence" fantasy. If you look at these things, it's more like psychological control. It's getting inside her head, knowing which words will make her give in to him and which validations she needs to hear, and using that knowledge to possess her.
That's why Kylo Ren's "You're nothing... but not to me" speech created so many fangirls.
You rarely see the billionaire screw over a small business, the vampire claim his victim, or the mafia don execute a hit.
The idea is seeing just how far these damaged, often vengeful figures will go and how their mindset will eventually do them.
People use violent fantasies to experience forced submission in a controlled, safe environment. However, they feel conflicted about fantasizing about something that would cause debilitating trauma in real life. Because it is a fantasy, the individual controls the scenario. Fantasies ≠ direct indicators of a desire to act them out in real life.
SUnown said in comment #2588459:
@Tasty_power_move: self-inserting as the one being violated in porn gives us similar thrills to riding a rollercoaster or watching a good B horror movie. It makes the heart race like you're playing with danger, but deep down you know it's safe and it's just play pretend.
I read somewhere that something like this is also the reason why horror games have a higher female to male players than other genres: it allows women to feel the thrill of being scared or vulnerable while being completely safe in a controlled space.
Tasty_power_move said in comment #2588266:
Why do our brains sometimes say "Yes it feels good to just give up my autonomy."
There was a Youtube video I watched a while back of a woman creator discussing this topic (unfortunately I lost the video link, so I'm going off memory). But the idea behind rape fantasies as the one being raped is that you lose any of the personal shame and responsibility that comes from sex outside the established norm. Rape turns sex from an act you consented to and share some responsibility from what occurs to an act which happened to you and you are completely not at fault for. If you live in a sex negative culture, this framing liberates you from the social stigma associated with sex and related acts. I assume it's the same with NTR; the fetishist wants the family support that comes with the legal institution of marriage, but is so ashamed of embracing their own sexuality that they externalize the sexual duties of marriage to another person/entity entirely. This also implies that sex negative cultures ironically encourage more agressive and esoteric kinks, but that's a whole other discussion.
Rape fetishism from the view of the rapist I think is just a need for control/certainty. The rapist's sexuality fits within the social norm but the other aspects that come with a 'normal' sexual relationship are either lacking or they don't care about.
Hthy said in comment #2602274:
The idea behind rape fantasies as the one being raped is that you lose any of the personal shame and responsibility that comes from sex outside the established norm. Rape turns sex from an act you consented to and share some responsibility from what occurs to an act which happened to you and you are completely not at fault for. If you live in a sex negative culture, this framing liberates you from the social stigma associated with sex and related acts.
Yup, that's how I started developing those kinds of fantasies when I was like 11. "If only a hot woman like those that appear on Playboy magazines would molest me, then id experience sex earlier and free of guilt…" (Of course, I was a dumb 11yo and I don't have to say that this comment is not endorsing actual child molestation, right?)
Mio was forced to take a break from streaming since her PC broke down
Updated by Brightlight
Rimuru_Tempest said in comment #2604329:
I wonder why this is getting deleted or unapproved but same animation uploaded by Approver(well approver) is getting approved but member doesn't
Because if the name of the uploader is purple it skips the approval process.
The logic behind it is that anyone who has uploaded enough approved posts would know what is or isn't good enough to meet the quality standards, so there's no need to have their uploads go through the approval process.
Incineration said in comment #2604330:
Because if the name of the uploader is purple it skips the approval process.
Just adding a very small correction here:
Purple is shared by three userlevels: Builder, Contributor, and Approver.
Only the latter two of those can skip the queue.
See for more information help:users
GabrielWB said in comment #2604336:
Just adding a very small correction here:
Purple is shared by three userlevels: Builder, Contributor, and Approver.
Only the latter two of those can skip the queue.See for more information help:users
I wish each of those ranks had its own color. It would make things a bit less confusing. Or maybe leave the colors as they are and add it in plaintext below the username (then maybe purple users will stop being confused for moderators).
Artistic error is tagged because Ichiro's mole was drawn on the wrong side.
NNescio said in comment #2587193:
She's lucky Donna didn't join in.
fax...gentildonna will tear off a limb or her whole head off...
NekoKoishi said in comment #2604220:
This is the first time I've ever seen a shoejob...
Pretty crazy, no?
Leave a comment