Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More ยป Listing Upload Hot Changes Help
A list of tags to help categorize this search. Space delimited.

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Tags

  • ? pokemon 301k
  • ? digimon 14k
  • ? eevee 5.3k
  • ? sylveon 2.8k
  • ? umbreon 2.6k
  • ? glaceon 2.5k
  • ? kirlia 2.3k
  • ? vaporeon 2.1k
  • ? espeon 2.0k
  • ? leafeon 1.8k
  • ? flareon 1.6k
  • ? jolteon 1.3k
  • ? venusaur 1.0k
  • ? ralts 1.0k
  • ? gastly 1.0k
  • ? haunter 831
  • ? hisuian zoroark 381
  • ? dartrix 169
  • ? evolutionary line 5.2k
  • ? pokemon (creature) 166k
  • ? no humans 168k
  • ? evolution 494
  • ? fakemon 538
  • ? animal focus 30k
  • ? digimon (creature) 11k

Options

Related

  • Deleted
  • Random
  • History
  • Discussions
  • Count
  • Posts Wiki Search »
  • Size
    • Small
    • Medium
    • Large
    • Huge
    • Huge
    • Gigantic
    • Absurd
    • Show scores
  • Edit

    A post centered around evolutionary lines of Pokemon and similar franchises (Digimon, etc).

    Also applies to fakemon or original creatures/monsters, so long as it's clear that they're part of the same evolutionary family.

    A few notes:

    • For this tag to apply, the picture should reasonably be about evolutionary lines. That is, the theme connecting characters in the picture should be the fact that they're part of the same family, not that they're part of the same franchise.
      • For example, post #4134648 technically contains a lot of evolutionary lines, but realistically nobody searching for this tag wants the majority of posts for unpopular pokemons to be everyone-style posts.
    • For an evolutionary line with 3 or more creatures, not every single one needs to be present. This tag is fine to use if there is focus on, for example, the first stage and third stage of an evolutionary line with the second stage creature not being present.
    • For Pokemon, Paradox Pokemon (introduced in Scarlet & Violet) are not considered to be part of the same evolutionary line as the Pokemon they are referencing

    View wiki

    0:44
    post #2236705
    post #2236552
    post #2236551
    post #2226255
    post #2203301
    post #2200300
    post #2198127
    post #2193256
    post #2191205
    post #2186740
    post #2180343
    post #2180288
    post #2180231
    post #2180063
    post #2176793
    post #2170822
    post #2164058
    post #2150619
    0:04
    post #2135115
    1 post(s) on this page require a Gold account to view (learn more).
    1 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 262
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /