post #909436 and child.
Posted under General
post #909436 and child.
tapnek said:
Top one no, fairly long proportions, bottom one yes, childish proportions.
tapnek said:
I say no, that's a fairly developed body structure. Not adult by any means, but not childish either.
post #2749218
Looks not really loli.
post #2318923
post #2571281
post #869540
These 3 posts used to be tagged with child but are currently tagged as loli, which wouldn't be much of a problem if they weren't 3 of the examples of a child instead of loli in the loli wiki which makes the examples rather counterproductive. Since I'm not sure myself which one is right, and given the sensitive nature of the loli tag, I figured I'd leave it here for someone else to decide on the right course of action.
Updated
post #2759442 and its child.
Provence said:
Well, I'd say that all posts (especially the last one) belongs to rating:q.
Mentioning @reiyasona , since it seems that the child and loli wiki could need revision.
I had a conversation with @tapnek about this topic a while ago. With tapnek's agreement I could share parts of the conversation here in the forum.
tapnek said:
I barely remember the conversation we had about that. You can share parts of it to refresh my memory.
reiyasona said:
tapnek said:
Do you mind explaining the difference between loli and child when it comes to images that are not "Safe"?
Reference: rating:questionable child
Hm ... let's take a look at both wikis:
loli: "This tag is for sexually explicit or sexually suggestive art work of girls [...]. Work-safe, non-sexual images of young girls should not be tagged as loli - that is what the child tag is for."
child: "If the child is involved in sexual acts, use the loli or shota tags as appropriate."
The definition seems to be pretty loose. According to the wiki, even safe images can be "sexually suggestive". The one thing that is crystal clear to me is that explicit images of prepubescent girls can never carry the child tag.
Would you tag something like post #2318923 with loli or child? Would you rate it q or e?
Updated
reiyasona said:
Stuff, stuff and more stuff.
So I haven't really been sure of what to respond to this and since Provence is out at the moment I can't expect him to respond either. But at least the examples on the wiki needs to be changed to avoid confusing users, I know you may be busy with all the Tumblr stuff right now but I think you are better at this than me.
Unbreakable said:
So I haven't really been sure of what to respond to this and since Provence is out at the moment I can't expect him to respond either. But at least the examples on the wiki needs to be changed to avoid confusing users, I know you may be busy with all the Tumblr stuff right now but I think you are better at this than me.
For now I reverted the changes on all three posts to be consistent with the wiki page again. I do think that the wiki page definitions are allowing rating:q child as a possible tag combination.