Posted under General
post #4213128 seems explicit rather than questionable. What's policy on gushing breast milk?
EDIT: actually, there's autopaizuri and visible sexual fluids in that image as well that I didn't notice. My question still stands, though: is heavy lactation (like in that image) enough for an explicit rating?
Oryuu said:
post #4213128 seems explicit rather than questionable. What's policy on gushing breast milk?
Definitely explicit
post #192835
There are no obviously sexual elements in this image (unless you count that tiny fold in her panties as a cameltoe), but the overall effect might be questionable. Do we count that?
ion288 said:
post #192835
There are no obviously sexual elements in this image (unless you count that tiny fold in her panties as a cameltoe), but the overall effect might be questionable. Do we count that?
No, I'd say it's safe.
Additionally, its child post has the loli tag, but I think it should be removed.
post #4149918 actually Q, or should be S?
e? said:
post #4149918 actually Q, or should be S?
I would say S, the girl in the background is to blurry and censored to count IMO.
post #4074146
Should this be a safe?
Cattywampus said:
post #4074146
Should this be a safe?
yup. no sexual elements visible except for the condom, but that alone doesn't warrant a rating change.
post #4394798
Is showing a lot of skin and ass in a very suggestive pose.
I've seen a lot of images like this lately being marked 'safe', probably just because they don't show any real genitals. Wondering if the rating has loosened.
keonas said:
post #4394798
Is showing a lot of skin and ass in a very suggestive pose.
I've seen a lot of images like this lately being marked 'safe', probably just because they don't show any real genitals. Wondering if the rating has loosened.
Should be q, with her blushing and looking back at you coupled with a good panty and ass shot it's very much q.
Unbreakable said:
Should be q, with her blushing and looking back at you coupled with a good panty and ass shot it's very much q.
I thought so too, but kinda getting mixed signals from this thread to be honest.
post #4074146 from above shows way more skin, 50% of her breasts and a thong even, and the intent of the image is even more explicate with the look, pose and condom, yet that one is safe.
keonas said:
I thought so too, but kinda getting mixed signals from this thread to be honest.
post #4074146 from above shows way more skin, 50% of her breasts and a thong even, and the intent of the image is even more explicate with the look, pose and condom, yet that one is safe.
I'm leaning towards q on that one because of the condom in her mouth, without it I would have strongly rated it s.
Unbreakable said:
I'm leaning towards q on that one because of the condom in her mouth, without it I would have strongly rated it s.
I guess that's what i mean. I remember images with this much exposed skin, especially breasts and groin were instantly a Q, regardless of other elements and intent, but lately (a year or so) that seems to have loosened. Thanks, i'll rate like this too.
I rated it Q just to be safe. Her cameltoe and covered nipples are really visible.
VR-Man said:
I rated it Q just to be safe. Her cameltoe and covered nipples are really visible.
Cameltoe is quite prominent/detailed so yeah its Q. Wouldnt have tagged it that on the nipples alone though.
Does Felicias fur cover enough of her breasts in post #3705628 for it to be rated S?
We had a discussion in the discord server and the policy is kinda gray here.
ion288 said:
Does Felicias fur cover enough of her breasts in post #3705628 for it to be rated S?
We had a discussion in the discord server and the policy is kinda gray here.
I don't think I would ever rate that as questionable. The only "sexual" thing about it is that it's skimpy clothing, no different than bikini.
nonamethanks said:
I don't think I would ever rate that as questionable. The only "sexual" thing about it is that it's skimpy clothing, no different than bikini.
We have previously rated bikinis Q if they are small enough. We have under boob and "inner side boob" here that are usually covered by bikinis.
I feel it would be inconsistent when armoured pasties that cover more than this has been rated Q, though I suppose I could try to check and rerate those.
I changed it to E, the uploader changed it back to Q. Her pussy and anus are clearly visible, and arguably the focus of the image.
Edit: post #4408841
I changed it to Q, Guaro changed it back to E. She's obviously masturbating, but it's not explicitly shown.
