Ratings check thread

post #5165055
post #6301488

forum #278720

santander said:

post #5165055
post #6301488

forum #278720

1st one I feel is G, unsure about the 2nd

santander said:

post #5165055
post #6301488

forum #278720

Reposting from the linked thread:

blindVigil said:

The posts were already rated S, so I removed child and readded flat chest, for the reasons you outlined in your previous comment. I didn't feel strongly that the rating should be changed, so I tagged it by its rating at the time.

IMO these should both be G + child.

post #7472994
Might ask about this one as well since it's the same issue. Change to G, or remove child?

Edit: For now, I'll remove child to be safe.

santander said:

post #5165055
post #6301488

When in doubt, choose S. I’d leave them at S to be on the safe side. (Pun not intended.)

kittey said:

When in doubt, choose S. I’d leave them at S to be on the safe side. (Pun not intended.)

I feel like these are right on the border considering the character's apparent age, so I have no problem with S, but I do think cases like these are still worth bringing up here since there are a few users that will take "when in doubt" to unreasonable extremes.

Blank_User said:

I feel like these are right on the border considering the character's apparent age, so I have no problem with S, but I do think cases like these are still worth bringing up here since there are a few users that will take "when in doubt" to unreasonable extremes.

kittey said:

When in doubt, choose S. I’d leave them at S to be on the safe side. (Pun not intended.)

Thanks. So I shouldn't change the tags at all/remove the flat chest one, then?

santander said:

Thanks. So I shouldn't change the tags at all/remove the flat chest one, then?

Yeah, it's fine to just leave them.

https://donmai.moe/posts/7487330?q=gawr_gura
https://donmai.moe/posts/7511299
https://donmai.moe/posts/7500058?q=gawr_gura

post #6981345seems S

c_spl said:

post #6981345

seems S

It's not seems if characters literally in underwear/bikini like that

Kuruma said:

It's not seems if characters literally in underwear/bikini like that

I meant as opposed to Q not G. wasn't sure if I was missing something that made it Q before

c_spl said:

I meant as opposed to Q not G. wasn't sure if I was missing something that made it Q before

My bad, man.
And yes, if the character just wear panties as long there not show the very questionable part like nipples, it's should be tag as sensitive

post #7492829

feel like the cameltoe is subtle enough for S

c_spl said:

post #7492829

feel like the cameltoe is subtle enough for S

I'd agree if there wasn't a full 2 seconds of the camera looking right at it. When the perspective wants you to look at it, I hesitate to call it subtle.

post #5779780
Mentioned in a recent feedback as being an example of G. I switched it to S a few months ago because of the emphasis on the breasts, but it was changed back. I still think it's eligible for S. What does everyone else think?

Blank_User said:

post #5779780
Mentioned in a recent feedback as being an example of G. I switched it to S a few months ago because of the emphasis on the breasts, but it was changed back. I still think it's eligible for S. What does everyone else think?

The boob socksand miniskirtmake it S, i think 🤔

Blank_User said:

post #5779780
Mentioned in a recent feedback as being an example of G. I switched it to S a few months ago because of the emphasis on the breasts, but it was changed back. I still think it's eligible for S. What does everyone else think?

I don't really see an emphasis on the breasts here, it's just a character with large breasts. IMO this is G

gfz said:

I don't really see an emphasis on the breasts here, it's just a character with large breasts. IMO this is G

Agreed, it's just a character with breasts. The only emphasis is because it's in the center, but that's literally just how anatomy works.