[Pkmn] I don't think it's that bad
post #11107735
Posted under General
[Pkmn] I don't think it's that bad
post #11107735
decant piece.
post #11143946
post #11143968
post #11143988
post #11144008
post #11144025
post #11144032
post #11144045
post #11144090
post #11144126
post #11144151
post #11144341
even the koikatsu highres images are gone just because nobody approved? come on...
4dkim said in forum #433477:
post #11143946
post #11143968
post #11143988
post #11144008
post #11144025
post #11144032
post #11144045
post #11144090
post #11144126
post #11144151
post #11144341even the koikatsu highres images are gone just because nobody approved? come on...
Not many Koikatsu images get approved. As of writing, there are 1139 such posts on this site, but only 237 are active. Of those 237, 171 were uploaded by Contributors, meaning only 66 were approved (about 7% of all such images uploaded by non-Contributors).
To quote an Approver:
NiceLittleDan said in forum #410890:
It's not impossible for koikatsu to be approved but it is very unlikely. I'd personally only ever approve it if it's of exceptional quality, a sentiment that seems similar amongst other approvers.
I have appealed this one.
I don’t see any problems with the quality of the post.
post #11147514
post #11147459
post #11149629
post #11149613
Would like to know why these didn't get approved? Proportions seem fine and the faces look okay
Updated by TheGamingRodent
Please.
post #11114230
post #11114241
post #11114318 (especially this one)
post #11114382
post #11114371
Sensitive:
post #11149882
I have appealed this post.
I don’t see any major,apparent or serious anatomical errors on post #11149882. And thus I think it deserves to be approved.
To be fair,while some of the deletions are understandable to me,there are also other deletions that I find it “Confusing” Such as post #11149882 in question. Like I said in the beginning, I do not see the art having errors that are major,apparent or serious enough to be deemed “Poor quality.”
Updated by Mr.Ritsuka
post #11144425
Just appealed this post. I wish an approver can look the post one last time
andrewb39 said in forum #433575:
post #11144425
Just appealed this post. I wish an approver can look the post one last time
Same here :
post #11149882 (A Sensitive post.)
Updated by Mr.Ritsuka
post #11153717 Does sketch is not allowed anymore? I think they having other accepted one.
post #10633374 (General), which I have previously asked about here, was flagged as low quality again and is now deleted again. What gets me with this one in particular is that *only* this image was flagged, not any of its siblings. What about this image makes it poorer quality than the others? They all seem to have the same overall quality to me (which is likewise for this artist in general...).
Anyway, yes, it's time for more failed appeals
GENERAL
post #10819395
post #10821766
post #10821823
post #10822559
SENSITIVE
post #10820079
post #10822546 (comment said "Malformed hand" and yeah I can see it, but I'll throw it on this list for completeness)
QUESTIONABLEpost #10819280 Thanks!
post #10822085 (parent post approved)
EXPLICIT
post #10819777
post #10702911 (all of its siblings passed their appeals, only this one didn't)
Thanks!
Updated by andlabs
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #433574:
Sensitive:
post #11149882I have appealed this post.
I don’t see any major,apparent or serious anatomical errors on post #11149882. And thus I think it deserves to be approved.
To be fair,while some of the deletions are understandable to me,there are also other deletions that I find it “Confusing” Such as post #11149882 in question. Like I said in the beginning, I do not see the art having errors that are major,apparent or serious enough to be deemed “Poor quality.”
Updates:
I have appealed post #11149882 due to the notion that I think the art’s quality is fine enoufh as it has few apparent anatomical errors,or at least,not as jarring as some of the deleted posts,and thus its should not be deemed unbearable or poor quality and should be approved. And yet,after 6 approvers and NO ONE approved the appealed post yet. As if there were more aspects in play when it comes to “Whether an art stay more than 3 days or not” .
One thing that upsets me,is that it really feels like you are tempting your own luck when you either upload or appeal a deleted post,as the approvers seemed to share a drastically different view on what is a good or fine fan art with the uploader, or those who appealed their deleted posts. In which from my personal experience,the successful rate of my appeals are rather low.
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #433593:
One thing that upsets me,is that it really feels like you are tempting your own luck when you either upload or appeal a deleted post,as the approvers seemed to share a drastically different view on what is a good or fine fan art with the uploader, or those who appealed their deleted posts. In which from my personal experience,the successful rate of my appeals are rather low.
I think the proportions of that, and several of the images you've appealed of Ishtar are off. That one particularly in the limb department.
One piece of advice I have from when I was restricted is that if something fails I wouldn't put it right back in the queue since the same set of eyes are going to be looking over it again. You're better off uploading new art and appealing the ones you still think are good later when different approvers are active.
zetsubousensei said in forum #433596:
I think the proportions of that, and several of the images you've appealed of Ishtar are off. That one particularly in the limb department.
One piece of advice I have from when I was restricted is that if something fails I wouldn't put it right back in the queue since the same set of eyes are going to be looking over it again. You're better off uploading new art and appealing the ones you still think are good later when different approvers are active.
In terms of limb department of post #11149882,I do not think the proportions are that off after closer look and still think it deserves to be approved. However,I also think the advice might be helpful.
I mean,I had a lot of posts deleted recently,and for those that I decided to appeal,are the ones that
A.Really want them to get the pass due to preference.
B.Personally consider them either having good,fine or acceptable quality.
Take post #11149882 for example. Like I mentioned before,even after a closer look and examination,I still think it deserves to be approved as I either think the overall quality is fine,or the errors are minor/trivial enough to warrant an approval.In addition, for post #11149882 in particular,It Is indeed, the few recently-deleted uploads that I think might worth an appeal/approval.
Updated by Mr.Ritsuka
Several other posts by this artist are already uploaded. Not sure why the one I submitted did not make the cut.
post #11153927 (Q)
Can someone explain why this post is bad enough to be deleted? I really thought it was better than most of my approved posts, but now I don't know what to think.
sockbox said in forum #433620:
post #11153927 (Q)
Can someone explain why this post is bad enough to be deleted? I really thought it was better than most of my approved posts, but now I don't know what to think.
I also have similar sentiments,sometimes the posts that you think is superb got deleted,while others that you think is decent but not perfect got approved.
(Explicit)
post #11153091
I'm a bit new to uploading; any idea why this one was deleted?
The quality of the art seems decent and human-made, and I think the tagging was sufficient. Additionally, a prior upload of mine for this particular artist went through.
I wasn't too sure about adding tags for unclear elements, such as "watch" and "wristwatch" for the blurred hand that isn't within the focus of the image. Should I have removed those?