Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

All my post are getting rejected because "unnaproved in 3 days".
Usually very few people out of all the reviewers find that its poor quality.
What am I supposed to do ?

post #11117507
post #11081725 <----
post #11111205 <---- I strongly recommend these 2
post #11116676
post #11116677
post #11106237

post #11120238
Off jacket variant of an EXISTING post.

Off topic: Okay, when I saw that grandpa take pills theory, I didn't concern then, but now, I'm kinda proning to it. My post acceptance was super smooth recently but it suddenly slowed down, around last week, and I'm starting losing slots. Maybe some conspiracy gonna explain this, like this website are hiding quality posts making those gooner waiting for it wait forever.
Now seriously. I guess it's timetable issue, everything will work fine after I schedule things back. Salute to approvers made my slots grow so fast last month!

Updated by T-447AVBM

sakurada_ichigo said in forum #432766:

post #11093259

Official Hololive art showcasing the 3D model of Takanashi Kiara in her swimsuit from the Perfume MV. Not sure why it didn't go through.

Has a positive score and it's even being used on her wiki pages.

Official art has a higher chance mainly because it is usually made by professional artists, but there are still no guarantees.

The score isn't relevant. Pretty much any post with a big-name VTuber in a swimsuit will end up with a positive score regardless of quality.

Our wiki pages are meant to provide information, not to showcase the best quality work. Official art is preferred for these pages even if the quality isn't the best.

Not making any judgements on the post itself, just explaining why these aren't good arguments.

kkuza said in forum #432777:

All my post are getting rejected because "unnaproved in 3 days".
Usually very few people out of all the reviewers find that its poor quality.
What am I supposed to do ?

From what I've seen, most Approvers don't mark posts as poor quality even if it's deserved. If three Approvers are marking your posts as poor quality, that is not a good sign.

Consider uploading artwork from other artists. That's what this site is mainly for, anyway. If you just want to share your own artwork here, then spend some time improving your art skills and try again later.

post #11109489 (Q)

Please give me a better idea of what is wrong with this post. I can't find anything. I am scanning this image looking for anatomy problems which may be causing the declinations, and am coming up completely empty.

I am utterly confused in the face of posts like this getting refused and posts like post #11028101 getting accepted. Advice to upload higher-quality pictures is not beneficial to me, because I have no idea what could possibly be preventing post #11109489 from being considered high-quality.

Updated by StarfishAtLarge

Not even all approvers are active, roughly under half of them simply don't care for much outside of a specific art style or their personal favorites, and their reasons for something being of "poor quality" are very often vague and ill-defined unless you make them explain what they take issue with in the uploads.

None of the images I uploaded from different artists were approved save for one of them, and if this keeps up, the amount of images I would be able to upload would continually shrink.

You really do play roulette with what will and what won't be approved on this site with at best distant approvers and at worst vague and inconsistent approvers.

Updated by RainbowLightZone

Blank_User said in forum #432819:

Official art has a higher chance mainly because it is usually made by professional artists, but there are still no guarantees.

The score isn't relevant. Pretty much any post with a big-name VTuber in a swimsuit will end up with a positive score regardless of quality.

Our wiki pages are meant to provide information, not to showcase the best quality work. Official art is preferred for these pages even if the quality isn't the best.

Not making any judgements on the post itself, just explaining why these aren't good arguments.

Yea, I see what you mean. I guess the post itself is just a turnaround of a 3D model, so it's not necessarily a "piece of art" in the traditional sense either. I probably should have just uploaded it SOLELY for wiki use, rather than an actual post. Live and learn I guess!

Thanks for the feedback Blank_user! Really appreciate it!

StarfishAtLarge said in forum #432860:

post #11109489 (Q)

Please give me a better idea of what is wrong with this post. I can't find anything. I am scanning this image looking for anatomy problems which may be causing the declinations, and am coming up completely empty.

I am utterly confused in the face of posts like this getting refused and posts like post #11028101 getting accepted. Advice to upload higher-quality pictures is not beneficial to me, because I have no idea what could possibly be preventing post #11109489 from being considered high-quality.

It's a shot in the dark at best because not all approvers are active all the time, and images are approved strictly based on their caprices we can't know. You just need to hope your images line up with their personal interests because what they may count as "poor quality" is not consistently applied if it happens with something they would otherwise like.

post #11101509 (E)

I posted this because I was annoyed that only the censored version was uploaded despite the uncensored version being available at the same time. It then proceeded to get rejected twice, and I'm pretty sure even the original approver did so as well. I want to help the site archive the best versions of images, but not if it's just going to tank my deletion ratio.

Edit: It got undeleted, but I'm still wary of posting 1ups for now.

Updated by Sock Box

RainbowLightZone said in forum #432905:

It's a shot in the dark at best because not all approvers are active all the time, and images are approved strictly based on their caprices we can't know. You just need to hope your images line up with their personal interests because what they may count as "poor quality" is not consistently applied if it happens with something they would otherwise like.

I also met such problems every once in a while. For example, today I posted post #11144486 and post #11144621
and yet other posts managed to be approved rather quickly,which already gives me a vibe that this post would not last more than 3 days. In addition, I uploaded post #11131645 due to the fact that the image was in the same link as another earlier posts. While I think the image has high quality,the approvers said that they refuse to approve the image because “They do not want to encourage random cropped images.” huh.

Last but not least,I managed to find several Ishtar arts that plays homage to Burney Relief:
post #11145532
post #11145584
post #11145577

I hope they are good enough to be approved. However,in my experiences,if my uploads did not get approved in the first 3 hours. Than it is quite likely that they would not last more than 3 days......