post #10111967
post #10108208post #10107512
post #10104910
post #10107199
post #10090580post #10077768
Any reason why these are not approved?
Updated by Legendliner
Posted under General
post #10111967
post #10108208post #10107512
post #10104910
post #10107199
post #10090580post #10077768
Any reason why these are not approved?
Updated by Legendliner
is this set really that bad? i lost a couple slots to this. i get not everyone is into this type of explicit stuff but it seems well drawn
post #10098066
post #10098069
post #10098073
post #10098078
post #10098081
post #10098083
also i have no idea what's wrong with these pics
post #10059351
post #9807819
post #9807911
post #9887317 (NSFW)
It is a continuation of already approved post #9919182.
post #10105625
post #10128040
post #10098045
post #10094858
are these really too bad? i think theyre well drawn and high quality, plus the third one has art in the same style accepted
Are these two really that bad?
post #10089590
Quality good and consistent with other artwork by the same artist.
post #10102741
Quality consistent with other approved artwork in the same pool.
While I acknowledge that the artwork has noticeable perspective inaccuracies, I believe its strong color balance, atmosphere, and overall finish make it a visually compelling piece. The technical imperfection doesn’t significantly detract from its artistic value, so I kindly request a reconsideration for approval.
Thank you for your time and review.
post #10111616
Not sure why these three sparkle posts by Leleka were left unapproved.
post #9629318
post #10025472
post #10104166
I'm assuming the longer one is due to peeps not liking the sounds for it?
Then some Velnier posts, I'm linking all 4 because at this rate the last two are certainly not getting approved.
post #10129925
post #10129976
post #10132218
post #10134197
It's completely beyond me why these weren't approved. Especially when I uploaded stuff by
Lazyprocrastinator and got it approved quite quickly.
Were these never approved because nobody liked the niche?
post #10098340
post #10098326
Then finally, my first post was never approved, and I wonder why.
post #10098147
Wondering why this kaguya underwater bondage post was left unapproved. Seems to have a good score and number of favorites.
please reconsider post #9700423
Hi,
I've posted some pictures by artist 'demekyon', several of them have been deleted with the reason 'unapproved in three days'. Only a few of those appear to have been marked as "[x] approvers believe it has poor quality", where [x] is usually 1, sometimes 2, and in one case 3.
Most of the posts had a score or favcount of about 27 +/- 5, the minimum score was around 11.
I'd like some more feedback than just "2 approvers believe it has poor quality", that's pretty vague and doesn't really tell me anything. Without more information it's easy to assume it's more reflection of personal taste and preference than the quality of the picture itself.
imo, worse quality pictures get approved all the time and there are older pictures approved that have less favourites. I don't think it's good that genuinely good pictures get deleted just because two or three people personally weren't keen.
These are the posts in question:
post #10131027
post #10131052
post #10131057
post #10131067
post #10131092
post #10131156
post #10131424
post #10131464
post #10131473
post #10131487
post #10131515
Thanks.
2gmgsmt said:
Most of the posts had a score or favcount of about 27 +/- 5, the minimum score was around 11.
imo, worse quality pictures get approved all the time and there are older pictures approved that have less favourites.
The score/fav count has no bearing on an upload's approvability.
Bernkastel83 said:
The score/fav count has no bearing on an upload's approvability.
Could you explain what does have bearing on an upload's approvability? To be clear, I'm asking sincerely, it's not a rhetorical question.
I don't understand why something like, as an example, post #8697541 is approvable, but post #10131067 is apparently not.
2gmgsmt said:
Could you explain what does have bearing on an upload's approvability? To be clear, I'm asking sincerely, it's not a rhetorical question.
I don't understand why something like, as an example, post #8697541 is approvable, but post #10131067 is apparently not.
Basically, if an approver likes it enough and thinks it looks good. Also the post you linked was never approved, it was uploaded by an unrestricted user.
Thank you, now I understand.
Then I'd like to ask and appeal to any approvers reading: please could you give me feedback on why those pictures by artist 'demekyon' are disapproved?
I would also like to ask you to reconsider your decision or consider approving the pictures.
Thank you
coolcat1258 said:
I was wondering if i could get some feedback on these posts
as far as i can tell they're decent enough.post #10110849
post #10110810
post #10110784
post #10110797
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #9776274 (Official art)
post #6870893
post #6310293
Can someone review these again please and thank you?
They don't too bad quality wise and other art by the artist has been accepted
post #10089331
post #10088307