is it about tags or there just aren't many approvers interested in arknights?
Posted under General
is it about tags or there just aren't many approvers interested in arknights?
Hello, Can I know what is wrong with post #10077897?
AngelFlash said:
I don't get how I can see an artist with a lot of uploads and zero or very little deleted posts, I'll upload their newest artwork, and then 3 days later they now have 1 deleted post and it's mine.
Yeah, its really unfortunate that approvers refuse to approve fanart, some fanart approvers refuse to approve
Updated by GolfFoxtrotLima
More appeals, mostly Momiji posts (and that will be the case at least for a bit...).
But first, a Patchouli: post #9875906 (sensitive). This one got marked "poor quality" by 3 people both times, with no explanation any time, and I'm not seeing it, especially compared to the artist's other work. If it's the shading, then that's just how they do shading...?
Failed yoyoiro appeals, all general
post #9879036
post #9904048
post #9906573
post #9906578
Again, these don't look too different from the approved ones...
Lastly (for now), post #9913153 (sensitive) which is definitely on the sketch-y side and I get its disinterest, but I'm including it for completeness.
Thanks again!
Metalhead33 said:
post #10071625
post #10071572
post #10067250
post #10061532
post #10061557
post #9978972
post #10060929
post #9978571
post #9919671
Out of these, I completely fail to understand what the hell might be wrong with post #10071625, given how so many people upvoted it.
Do approvers come from a different universe than general users of this site?
Metalhead33 said:
Out of these, I completely fail to understand what the hell might be wrong with post #10071625, given how so many people upvoted it.
Do approvers come from a different universe than general users of this site?
The number of upvotes doesn't correlate with quality, there's lots of terrible art that'll get a decent number of upvotes just because it's horny while there's good scenery art that'll only get a handful of upvotes.
Bernkastel83 said:
The number of upvotes doesn't correlate with quality, there's lots of terrible art that'll get a decent number of upvotes just because it's horny while there's good scenery art that'll only get a handful of upvotes.
Okay, let's compare post #2719 to post #10071625.
One was approved. The other was not. Yet, I think we can objectively tell, that the latter is objectively of a higher quality.
Metalhead33 said:
Okay, let's compare post #2719 to post #10071625.
One was approved. The other was not. Yet, I think we can objectively tell, that the latter is objectively of a higher quality.
That's a post from twenty years ago you're trying to compare to a recent post.
Additionally, post #2719 wasn't approved by an approver. I'm not sure if the site even had a moderation queue back then.
please reconsider
post #9994305
Currently appealing, maybe this way more approvers will see these arts:
post #10076097
post #10076676
post #10076788
post #10078703
Also these two are gonna be deleted soon as well:
post #10082952
post #10083708
Getting 6 arts deleted in a row is kind of brutal i wont lie, especially when i really think all of the above arts are great.
Art without the background. Parent got approved
Updated by a moderator
Alto1867 said:
Just......why ?
Why was this deleted ?
Or this
Chief you’re a Contributor, you should both know not to double post in a thread and that this is for people to get an explanation for their posts refusal, not a venue of appeals for other people’s posts.
Not sure why post #10062068 was not approved even though there are basically similar uploads of the artists already on the site.
Just wondering why these weren't considered
post #10082737 (child of approved post)
post #10082365
post #10072315
post #9749971
post #10082323
post #10072189
Updated by FemboyWoody
post #9659673 isn’t even my upload, yet I was the one to appeal it. I find it weird that its parent was approved, yet the post itself, a clear continuation of the parent, wasn’t. I have absolutely no clue what the hell the approvers have against it! 8 disapproved of it at the time of me writing this! Is it simply because the approvers are silently biased against me?