post #9228321 (child of similar approved parent), post #9200009, post #9228529
Posted under General
post #9228321 (child of similar approved parent), post #9200009, post #9228529
Please give me feedback!
I don't see any quality issues with these illustrations.
post #9197986
post #9198006
post #9204025
post #9219105
post #9219156
post #9219164
post #9232263
post #9232303
post #9188191
I've posted other artwork from Naoko Takeuchi's Volume 1 & Volume 2 artbooks, what is wrong with these two? I didn't edit the images, the flowers are there on the original pages
post #9213258post #9234216post #9234559
post #9234568 (child of an approved post)post #9235184post #9235189
post #9237083
post #9239111 (I don't see any quality problems)
post #9239237
post #9244027 (as above)
post #9244199 (as above)
post #9244485 (as above)
post #9245743
post #9245779
post #9246253
Any feedbacks on why these posts were not approved?
Updated by asgembed . js
post #7902169
would you moderators mind to revert the delete, give feedback, and approve this post of mine?
post #9236324←High pixel version
post #9222938
post #9223030
post #9189804
post #9232295
post #9232264
post #8459100
post #8667127
post #8985246 (the photo child post got approved)
post #8738763
I don't think these illustrations have any quality issues. Please give me feedback.
Getting used to this. But hey, new posts to ask feedback for!
post #9237993, post #9238044
Also post #9200009, it would be a huge favor to know if there’s anything wrong with it.
Any help for post #6797731, post #6640714, post #6367589 and post #9010606 ?
post #9242319 (only 5 approvers viewed it, i don’t see what’s wrong with it) and post #9228529
aster1a said:
post #9242319 (only 5 approvers viewed it, i don’t see what’s wrong with it) and post #9228529
"only 5 approvers viewed it" means that you appeal, typically- same for the latter, although it looks like a contributor already did that for you, so you don't need to spend the upload slots doing it yourself. I do think that both posts deserve to get approved, but it's also true that certain types of illustrations tend to get a harder time here (it's hard to pin it down to exact words, honestly, but you kind of get a feel for it if you look around long enough), so I'm not /super/ surprised that they managed to fall through the gaps, personally
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #6268502
Updated by SidBarrett
I’m not sure why these posts weren't approved. I would appreciate any feedback.
post #9242504 (A sequal to an already approved parent post)
post #9235020 (A sequel to an already approved parent post)
post #9220362 (A post I couldn't find any quality problems with)
post #9207595 (A post of similar quality to other approved art by the artist)
Subject: Feedback request on disapproved posts – Seeking clarification
Hi, I would like to request feedback regarding several recent uploads of mine that were disapproved.
All of the posts listed below were automatically rejected due to going three days without being approved ("no approver interest").
While I understand that moderators and approvers are very busy and can’t review everything in time, it's disheartening to see these works removed without any specific feedback—especially since I made sure they followed the site’s upload guidelines:
High resolution and good quality
Proper tagging and artist/source attribution
Similar style and content to other approved posts on the site
I would truly appreciate any insights into what may have led to the lack of interest. If there’s something I can improve—whether it’s tagging, image quality, or selection—I’d like to learn and do better.
Here are the posts in question:
post #9219156
post #9219164
post #9232263
post #9232303
post #9236291
post #9240785
post #9240802
post #9242537
post #9244820
post #9244842
post #9244908
post #8925773
Also, I want to sincerely thank the moderators and approvers for their continued hard work. I understand how much time and effort it takes to manage the volume of uploads, and I really appreciate the time you dedicate to keeping the site high-quality and well-organized.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Updated by Splash Numbers
Never got a reason why post #8414485 got deleted. Basically the only thing this artist has posted that's been deleted in years
post #9242248 (tagged as sensitive at first, apparently it was explicit insteead?) I'm quite surprised this one got rejected considering the other approved works, although it was struggling a bit with modqueue...post #8917199 might ask for this older deleted post too
Edit: Thanks for both the approvals!
Updated by Maewelette
