I want a re-trial.
Posted under General
I want a re-trial.
Why was this not approved?
Please give me feedback!
post #9188120
post #9188154
post #9188174
post #9188191
coolcat1258 said:
Could i get some feedback on these?
post #7117389
post #8871546
post #9180248
post #9157359
post #8871546 I think it's the arms
Maewelette said:
Can I get some tips on why they got deleted?
At first glance they seemed to be on par with past works from both these artists. Maybe the first drawing is too simple and there aren't many uploads in the first place? I don't understand the second one tho by looking at previous uploads.
Also I'm not entirely sure if this is the correct topic to ask, but is my tagging okay for now? I know it doesn't influence approvals, but I still wanna improve.
Edit: Thanks for the latter!
After a month or so I'm gonna ask tips for post #9184328 too. I was a bit more confident with this one compared to other approved uploads...
Edit: Thanks for the approval Nacha!
Updated by Maewelette
post #9190059
To be honest, I don't see how this one's quality is particularly lower than most loli artworks active here.
Updated by FivePastNever
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #6347192
Updated by SidBarrett
post #9209816
post #9209852
post #9209793
post #9209763
hewwo, these posts were deleted because of supposed "AI" when I drew them myself... any advice or anything? =w=
Posting this again since my last two forum posts got blown past
-
Genuinely baffled by these two:
This is official art, it absolutely should be being approved for archival purposes.
Another user uploaded official art from the same game and got approved, so I have ZERO clue why these wouldn't be.
The failed appeals continue. We're nearing the finish line though at least, and most of these had a lot of reviewers on appeal, which is both encouraging and concerning since I can only conclude that it's just general lack of interest??? At this point I'm just doing these posts to exhaust all options to lower my deleted posts count. (There are a few deleted posts I'd still really like explanations for, but I'll get to them after I finish appealing everything.)
Sensitive/Questionablepost #8932898 - I think this is good quality at least Thanks!
post #8504333 - Someone in the comments pointed out a quality issue but I'm not sure how much I agree with itpost #8886764 - I think this is good quality despite the blurriness Thanks!
post #8597246 - This one on the other hand I'm willing to concede is iffier with the leg perspective
Explicit
post #8886628 - Again, not seeing quality issues with this one
post #8902766 - Likewise with this, but it is a bit on the extreme end of the this-site spectrum
Updated by andlabs
Wondering about post #8986847. Appealed it again after a while, well tagged and all, so I'm not sure what's up. Maybe it's me, but does source have a "chance" at deciding whether a work is good enough or not? Though Deviantart is the only place I found it
The parent with a reference inset was approved, so I'm bumping this one.
Update: Thanks Nacha!
Updated by drinkyourvegetables
Realhi87 said:
Posting this again since my last two forum posts got blown past
-
Genuinely baffled by these two:This is official art, it absolutely should be being approved for archival purposes.
Another user uploaded official art from the same game and got approved, so I have ZERO clue why these wouldn't be.
Official art still has to look good enough for being approved. "Being archived" is no reason to approve it, because you can still find it on herr, even when it's "deleted".
Realhi87 said:
Posting this again since my last two forum posts got blown past
-
Genuinely baffled by these two:This is official art, it absolutely should be being approved for archival purposes.
Another user uploaded official art from the same game and got approved, so I have ZERO clue why these wouldn't be.
It's because fandom is generally an awful source and these look upscaled (and are possibly extractions)
post #9197980
Can I get feedback on this one? I uploaded it cause it's a variant of an art that was approved
Looking for feedback on this ones?
is it because of the themes, or maybe is it because the artist artstyle changed a lot?
post #9197360
post #9199384
Are they really that bad?