Posted under General
What was wrong with all these posts besides explicit allergic?
post #8666424
post #8666300
post #8662363
post #8662144
post #8662102
post #8660383
post #8660220 (This one is like are you for real!?)
post #8657720
post #8657253
post #8657244
post #8657204
post #8655937
post #8655920
post #8667148
post #8667170
post #8667185
post #8679041 (sigh)
Updated by 35pmachi
What's the deal with these?
post #8665496
post #8665456
post #8665449
post #8665433
post #8665425
post #8657873
I can't see how they are any worse than a typical post on Danbooru.
What's wrong with these posts?
Requesting to checkover these deleted posts, I've added more tags and wish for a 2nd opinion
post #8658212
post #8651165
post #8650876
post #8650759
post #8440727
post #8440680
post #7953214
post #7953184
post #7929585
post #7843321
post #7838313
post #7838300
post #7392877
Why were these rejected?
Updated by FemboyWoody
35pmachi said:
There are like no approvers or approvers have bad taste, one of the two
There are actually quite a few approvers, almost 100 (granted not all are currently active) but you probably knew that already.
post #8658108
post #8658198
post #8658256
Feedback appreciated :3
post #8652768 Why was this unapproved, It's high quality and the only art of her I could find.
Eygz said:
post #8640059
post #8640070
post #8640077
post #8640101The 5th image managed to get approved, so I was wondering if the other 4 were of low quality or just not liked enough.
gothic_anime_angel said:
post #8658108
post #8658198
post #8658256Feedback appreciated :3
post #8658108: I'm guessing the artist's artstyle/theme didn't catch the likings of the approvers. Going through his other artwork and if I have to describe it; interestingly avant-garde.
post #8658256: I can only say the thighs of the girl on the right, unless that's part of their personal artstyle.
35pmachi said:
post #8679041
post #8660220
post #8671799
post #8677121sigh
post #8679041 and post #8677121 were still pending when you asked. This thread is for deleted posts. Wait until after the first three days.
You were already given feedback on post #8660220, and I see what they mean about the hands. The right wrist is definitely twisted farther than what is realistically possible for most humans (I tried and couldn’t even get close).
andlabs said:
I'm confused about why post #8342515, which is mine, and post #8224074, which is someone else's, are low quality. In particular, my appeal on that first one was responded with "Time to flag some of this artist for rewiew", but only that one other post wound up being flagged. I'm not seeing how they're different from the other approved posts by that artist? I get that most of their posts are meme-esque and have additional stylistic filters added to them, but that wasn't the case for mine.
I'd like to once again ask about these two, as well as the following failed appeals:
post #8606666 Thanks!
This is the SFW parent of an approved NSFW child post (post #8611756). What's wrong with this one that isn't an issue with the NSFW one?
post #8617446 Thanks!
I'm not seeing what's wrong with this one.
post #8580880 Thanks!
I understand that Takane looks a bit big in this one, but I chalked that up to the artist drawing her as muscular and therefore bigger in general. In fact, they have since posted more art that only further confirms that point. Is something else wrong with it that I'm missing?
post #8348218
May as well also throw this in, since it's the only failed appeal so far that isn't listed here. Is there something wrong with the sketch nature of it, or is there something else wrong? I just checked the artist's page and they did upload a more polished/finished version as well that I completely missed.
Thanks!
Updated by andlabs
My deleted post #8676527 's resolution is 3218x4096.
Parent post #8678619 's resolution is 5500x7000, which was posted later.
I know that the post with lower resolution can be ignored not to be approved and be deleted in result.
My question is whether the fact that those 2 posts have artist's different commentary could be the reasonable reason of appeal and approval.
I would like to know why post #8644977 was undeleted but post #8644973 and post #8644979 weren’t.
They’re the same image with the only difference being the number of bandages. I don’t understand why one child would be undeleted while the parent and other child remain deleted when they’re so similar?
post #8664671（From a certain point on, the mount lady I uploaded was deleted by you all the time.）
post #8672521（It lacks content showing feet than the other two posts and is smaller in size, so it is also a sub-post showing different angles. I don’t think it should be deleted like this.）
post #8629331 (What is the problem with this?)
Updated by lotus flame
Only checked by 6 approvers
post #8678340
