Is there anything wrong with this posts?
post #8688762
Posted under General
Is there anything wrong with this posts?
post #8688762
Both of these were only checked out by 4 approvers each.
Why where these rejected?
post #8707358
post #8700215
post #8699528
post #8670486
post #8607059
post #8693367
MF144 said:
Why where these rejected?
post #8700215 short looking arm
post #8607059 weird perspective
post #8693367 poor looking anatomy, long stomach
This is just great, another good picture ignored
post #8710725
Wondering about these
all checked by no more than 6 approvers
post #8685989
post #8686014
post #8686027
post #8704422
post #8704446
post #8704464
post #8704512
post #8707911
post #8712146
post #8712203
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #8711968 (reviewed by only 7 approvers)
post #8684473 (reviewed by only 7 approvers)
Updated by SidBarrett
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? The previous posts from the same family got approved.
post #8709515 (reviewed by only 4 approvers)
Hi, any feedback on these would be appreciated
post #8711655 (6 approvers checked)
post #8698363 (6 approvers checked)
May I ask why this post(post #8714133) wasn't approved? This post is a photo by an indie virtual YouTuber shared on Twitter. It didn’t state that reuploads are prohibited and doesn’t seem to violate other rules either.
user_1099148 said:
The post #7982839 is pretty grotesque for my taste, and the comments seems to agree with that idea. I assume the Approvers that reviewed that post can agree with that too.
Grotesque? When its just exagerated sex scene???? Meanwhile guro ryona are approved daily? bruh
post #8707144 just a nice erotic comic
post #8686623 lower body has good quality
post #8686631 fairly good
post #8686626 fairly good
post #8696426 this one is just great unless there is a issue unrelated to the image like copyright etc
post #8696491 good quality but unique perspective angle distortion hands are hidden
post #8686612 ok quality with some higher quality parts like the legs and lower body
post #8678150 plain good quality and erotic
post #8508179 sligthly bad quality trap
post #8706081 high quality monochrome new years celebration
post #8483761 good quality GakuMasu comic
post #8696512 futa fairly good quality
post #8368132 very typical of the artist image with million similar aproved
post #8254577 high quality naked version of an already aproved post
post #8482904 stylized but kinda slightly low quality
Please explain these ones.
Updated by theo1996
theo1996 said:
post #8483761 good quality GakuMasu comic
Ai-generated art is against the upload rules.
I'm new here and not sure if novel illustrations are harder to get approved. I think these ones(post #8714270, post #8714265, post #8714259) are not bad, and I’ve noticed similar illustrations by the same artist have been approved before.
What about these posts?
Why was this post not approved?
Any specific issues with this one?
MF144 said:
What about these posts?
My guess is that they all have have something noticeable with their hands that the approvers didn't like?