BUR #58475 is pending approval.
create implication aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(zenless_zone_zero)
create implication aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(zenless_zone_zero)
To make things easier
Posted under Tags
BUR #58475 is pending approval.
create implication aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(zenless_zone_zero)
create implication aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(zenless_zone_zero)
To make things easier
Related: topic #34955, forum #423856
These tags don't exist so this BUR will do nothing. You have to make the tags either by tagging a (few) post(s) or using the update keyword, ideally mass update a favgroup if you're going that route. These are also going to need wikis.
I'll favgroup this if no else is doing it. Distinguishing wholly different official designs shouldn't be left up to gentags.
I was stuck on whether Aria (Discordant Note) (Zenless Zone Zero) would need two separate tags
post #10891533 becoming
or
Acheron (Slashed Dream)'s interaction with Acheron (Izumo) seems to indicate the former is fine.
It's been 2 years (I can't believe it) since the video first featuring Acheron (Izumo) was released, so I had completely forgotten that she has a transformation with that outfit as well, mostly the same changes aside from red horns. Allowing Acheron (Slashed Dream) to be used with Izumo was a bit of an afterthought.
I figured that it made sense to use the one character tag to describe "this is her active transformation" and then you can add or remove Izumo from the results depending on what you want to see, and at 155 posts I wasn't sure if I wanted to do a second tag even if it meant making people do a two-tag search just for the "transformed Izumo" appearance. I don't think this is an actual precedent though so if it were to be separated I wouldn't be opposed. The norm is usually to make specific tags as you've laid out in the latter example. If three levels of implications can't be helped, it can't be helped.
If precedent is needed within miHoYo tagging, a better example to look at would be:
Those are small tags but still use three levels of implications to split results given a base character and variants of them. If anything, Acheron should probably be updated to split out the Izumo transformed appearance to match the above two since it's already worth more than half the tag per the count of acheron_(izumo)_(honkai:_star_rail) (red_horns or red_hands or colored_extremities).
BUR #58486 is pending approval.
mass update aria_(zenless_zone_zero) id:<11263593 -favgroup:54801 -favgroup:54802 -favgroup:54804 -favgroup:54805 -> char:aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero)
mass update favgroup:54801 -> char:aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero)
mass update favgroup:54802 -> aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero) aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero)
mass update aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero) aria_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> char:aria_(human)_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero)
mass update aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero) aria_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> char:aria_(robot)_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero)
mass update favgroup:54804 -> aria_(human)_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero) aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero)
mass update favgroup:54805 -> aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero) aria_(robot)_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero)
create implication aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(zenless_zone_zero)
create implication aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(zenless_zone_zero)
create implication aria_(human)_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(human)_(zenless_zone_zero)
create implication aria_(robot)_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(robot)_(zenless_zone_zero)
remove implication aria_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero) -> aria_(zenless_zone_zero)
nuke aria_(discordant_note)_(zenless_zone_zero)
This is a bit complicated. I tried to write it cleanly even if it's not efficient.
Favgroups:
This BUR (if I did everything correctly):
Other things:
Updated by Spatula22
