Posted under Tags
BUR #43786 has been rejected.
create implication butt_crack -> ass
Took a quick look at the tag -ass and realized there's 200 pages. Of the first 10 pages, I see ass applying as a tag to every image, and that makes sense given that it would be quite hard to have a composition where there is a butt crack but no ass.
Updated by Freshblink
The bulk update request #43786 (forum #370174) has been rejected by @Freshblink.
Rejecting cause everyone seems to disagree. Would be nice if people explained why it's wrong.
Think ill just do it manually, since I am not seeing my assertion being wrong. If there is an exception ill notice it.
Updated by Freshblink
hasu_no_tokimeki said:
What happens if the ass is just out of frame?
Thats the only situation I could think of, makes sense.
Updated by Freshblink
My concern is that this kind of implication / tagging policy would turn ass into another breasts, applied to anyone who seems to have an ass, regardless of whether the body part in question is the least bit prominent in the picture.
Despite the presence of butt crack, I don't see any more reason to tag post #9452209, post #9468949 or post #9570385 ass than I see to tag post #9604266, post #9604505 or post #9604544 breasts. But perhaps that ship, too, has already sailed.
