FGO requests

xcv450 said:

BUR #23958 has been rejected.

create implication astraea_(fate) -> luviagelita_edelfelt
create implication astraea_(road_to_star)_(fate) -> astraea_(fate)
create implication kaleido_sapphire -> luviagelita_edelfelt

Astraea + Luvia
Going from the Parvati/Sakura and Bazett/Manannan precedents*.

Is it a Parvati case, or an Ishtar case? Because we ended up unimplying Ishtar from Rin. Make a new topic.

xcv450 said:

BUR #23959 has been rejected.

Show

create implication sitonai_(fate) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern
create implication sitonai_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> sitonai_(fate)
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(beast_style) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(cook_heart) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(dress_of_heaven) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(phantasmal_princess) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(prisma_klangfest) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(type-moon_racing) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(swimsuit_archer)_(first_ascension) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern_(swimsuit_archer)
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(swimsuit_archer)_(second_ascension) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern_(swimsuit_archer)
create implication illyasviel_von_einzbern_(swimsuit_archer)_(third_ascension) -> illyasviel_von_einzbern_(swimsuit_archer)

Sitonai + Illya

forum #207444. This needs its own topic.

The bulk update request #23959 (forum #271366) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #23962 (forum #271371) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #23964 (forum #271374) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #23969 (forum #271400) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

xcv450 said:

BUR #23996 has been rejected.

create implication uesugi_kenshin_(fate) -> nagao_kagetora_(fate)
create implication uesugi_kenshin_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> uesugi_kenshin_(fate)
create implication uesugi_kenshin_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> uesugi_kenshin_(fate)
create implication uesugi_kenshin_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> uesugi_kenshin_(fate)

Kenshin

The wiki doesn't explain anything about these skins. I assume this is not a case of a duplicate tag? Are there other skins of nagao_kagetora_(fate) that aren't Kenshin?

The bulk update request #24000 (forum #271500) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #24001 (forum #271501) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #24004 (forum #271505) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #24040 (forum #271778) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

xcv450 said:

BUR #24039 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Show

create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(witch_of_moonlit_night)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(swimsuit_ruler)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(chaldea_park_caravan)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(summer_anniversary)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(traveling_outfit)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(fgo_fes._2019)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(active_sailor)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)
remove implication leonardo_da_vinci_(bella_lisa)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(fate)
create implication leonardo_da_vinci_(bella_lisa)_(fate) -> leonardo_da_vinci_(rider)_(fate)

Leonardo da Vinci

This is a great example of why flat implications suck for fate. All of these are for child Leonardo. It would be a clusterfuck to have all of them implicated to the base tag.

The bulk update request #24039 (forum #271769) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #24173 (forum #272311) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #24552 (forum #273756) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #24572 (forum #273865) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #25267 (forum #276916) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

ProbablyGod231 said:

BUR #25216 has been rejected.

create implication uesugi_kenshin_(fate) -> nagao_kagetora_(fate)
create implication the_count_of_monte_cristo_(fate) -> edmond_dantes_(fate)

They're both the same people, or close enough in lore to warrant the implication.

These need their own topic. Please don't sneak in potentially controversial BURs like these in huge topics.

The bulk update request #25216 (forum #276728) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #23958 (forum #271364) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.