FGO requests

BUR #45678 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication indra_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> indra_(fate)
create implication ishtar_(fgo_x_lawson_2020)_(fate) -> ishtar_(fate)
create implication ishtar_(grand_journey)_(fate) -> ishtar_(fate)
create implication ishtar_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> ishtar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(battle_president)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(casual_wear)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(loppi_hmv_rider)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(muscle_bullet)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(waku_waku_colorful_ericeland)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)

BURs 70~72 from forum #376779.
While on the subject of Iskandar, people familiar with Fate/Extella &c please tell me what the costume in post #7338502 is called/create a tag for it? I can tell there's official merchandise for it so its clearly an official alternate costume but I was struggling to find any documentation on what it's called.

BUR #45679 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BURs 73~77 from forum #376779. unrelated but shout out to user #508969 for consistently uploading female focus craft essences including the ones from the celebratory attire series except for jaguarman instead uploading tutankhamun i guess?

BUR #45680 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication johanna_(a_reward_for_your_studies)_(fate) -> johanna_(fate)
create implication johanna_(event_portrait)_(fate) -> johanna_(fate)
create implication kama_(comiket_100)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(comiket_104)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(comiket_96)_(fate) -> kama_(young)_(fate)
create implication kama_(fgo_x_lawson_2023)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(male)_(fate) -> kama_(fate)
create implication kama_(otaku-friendly_gyaru)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> kama_(young)_(fate)

BURs 78~79 from forum #376779. Implying each of the Kama costumes to her respective ascensions. Oh hey, now we're reaching the ones I didn't imply in the last batch.

BUR #45685 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR 80 from forum #376779.

BUR #45686 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication kashin_koji_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> kashin_koji_(fate)
create implication kashin_koji_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> kashin_koji_(fate)
create implication katou_danzou_(first_valentine)_(fate) -> katou_danzou_(fate)
create implication katou_danzou_(midsummer_memories)_(fate) -> katou_danzou_(fate)
create implication katou_danzou_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> katou_danzou_(fate)
create implication katou_danzou_(the_unmanipulatable_ones)_(fate) -> katou_danzou_(fate)
create implication katou_danzou_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> katou_danzou_(fate)
create implication katou_danzou_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> katou_danzou_(fate)

BURs 81~82 from forum #376779.

BUR #45687 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BURs 83~85 from forum #376779.

BUR #45688 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication komahime_(exhibition_attire)_(fate) -> komahime_(fate)
create implication kotomine_kirei_(businessman) -> kotomine_kirei
create implication kotomine_kirei_(march_of_the_saints) -> kotomine_kirei_(fate/zero)
create implication kotomine_kirei_(prisma_illya) -> kotomine_kirei
create implication koyanskaya_(fgo_fes._2024)_(fate) -> koyanskaya_(fate)
create implication koyanskaya_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> koyanskaya_(fate)
create implication koyanskaya_(twin_tail)_(fate) -> koyanskaya_(fate)
create implication kukulkan_(event_portrait)_(fate) -> kukulkan_(fate)
create implication kukulkan_(ref-rain)_(fate) -> kukulkan_(fate)
create implication kurohime_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> kurohime_(fate)

BUR 86~90 from forum #376779.

BUR #45689 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication kyokutei_bakin_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(holy_blue)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)

BURs 91 & 94 from forum #376779.
Skipping Kyokutei Bakin (Past) for being a tag I'm not sure should exist in the first place, but it definitely shouldn't be implicated to the main tag even if it sticks around.
Skipping BUR 92 because topic #32320 never went anywhere.
Skipping BUR 93 because the Laeticia/Jeanne d'Arc split is a mess.

BUR #45690 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BURs 95~97 from forum #376779.
Adjusting implications to point towards Leonardo da Vinci (Rider) where appropriate.
No reason to directly imply her final ascension as a swimsuit ruler to her main tag as a swimsuit ruler.
Related: topic #32234

BUR #45692 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BURs 98~102 from forum #376779. Pointing Shuwen's tags to the young/old subtags as appropriate.

BUR #45693 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR 103~105 from forum #26405.

BUR #45694 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BURs 106~110 from forum #376779. Guess I'll include implicating Anning's second ascension even if I think it should be exploded (forum #376444) because if that BUR succeeds the implication will be removed anyways and if it fails the implication will need to be made.

BUR #45695 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication mary_read_(pirates_of_the_jungle)_(fate) -> mary_read_(fate)
create implication mary_read_(snow_pirates)_(fate) -> mary_read_(fate)
create implication mata_hari_(be_shelved)_(fate) -> mata_hari_(fate)
create implication mata_hari_(guiding_the_lily)_(fate) -> mata_hari_(fate)
create implication medb_(fgo_x_lawson_2017)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medb_(maidens'_luncheon)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medb_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medb_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medea_lily_(bestia_del_sol)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(fate)
create implication medea_lily_(witches'_kitchen)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(fate)

BURs 111, 113, 116~117 from forum #26405. Don't feel like dealing with the Matous in BUR 114/115 right now. Circling back to Mash in my next request.

BUR #45696 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR 112 from forum #376779. Mash Kyrielight (Alter) (FGO Alternative) is probably the most contentious one here but all two posts of it are already tagged with Mash Kyrielight anyways so its a moot point imo. I need to update the main gallery for Mash Kyrielight in general but also with the Fate/Grand Order Waltz in the Moonlight/Lostroom costumes specifically. I'll do that after I eat lunch. BUR first, lunch later, gallery laterest.

Ylimegirl said:

BUR 112 from forum #376779. Mash Kyrielight (Alter) (FGO Alternative) is probably the most contentious one here but all two posts of it are already tagged with Mash Kyrielight anyways so its a moot point imo. I need to update the main gallery for Mash Kyrielight in general but also with the Fate/Grand Order Waltz in the Moonlight/Lostroom costumes specifically. I'll do that after I eat lunch. BUR first, lunch later, gallery laterest.

If Mash Alter is OC then wouldn't Mash Kyrielight + alter servant do the job?

elchocoloco said:

If Mash Alter is OC then wouldn't Mash Kyrielight + alter servant do the job?

mash_kyrielight alter_servant give a whole lot of different fan designs for that concept. mash_kyrielight fate/grand_order_alternative on the other hand gives the same results, but IDK enough about FGOA to know if that's always going to work (and the user who made the wiki page &c for it has since expunged their account (again), so I guess I'd have to do research.)

BUR #45698 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication medusa_(all_three_together)_(fate) -> medusa_(rider)_(fate)
create implication medusa_(andromeda_gear)_(fate) -> medusa_(rider)_(fate)
create implication medusa_(formal_dress)_(fate) -> medusa_(lancer)_(fate)
create implication medusa_(sweet_flower)_(fate) -> medusa_(lancer)_(fate)
create implication medusa_(lancer)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> medusa_(lancer)_(fate)
create implication meltryllis_(fgo_fes._2020)_(fate) -> meltryllis_(swimsuit_lancer)_(fate)
create implication meltryllis_(kyomaf_2023)_(fate) -> meltryllis_(fate)
create implication meltryllis_(mysterious_forest)_(fate) -> meltryllis_(fate)
create implication melusine_(grand_journey)_(fate) -> melusine_(fate)
create implication melusine_(the_treasure)_(fate) -> melusine_(fate)

BURs 118~121 from forum #376779.
Implying the Medusas to Rider and Lancer as appropriate.
Implying Meltryllis (Fgo Fes. 2020) to her Swimsuit Lancer ver. because of the prostheses.

BUR #45704 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BURs 122~123 from forum #376779.

BUR #45705 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BURs 124~126 from forum #376779.

BUR #45706 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(muscle_bullet)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication miyamoto_iori_(riceball_remnant)_(fate) -> miyamoto_iori_(fate)
create implication miyamoto_musashi_(exhibition_attire)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate)
create implication miyamoto_musashi_(fgo_x_pasela_resorts)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate)

BURs 127~129 from forum #376779. Still think Minamoto no Tametomo (First Ascension) at the very least should be exploded (it makes up 34 posts of his 64-post tag, it's not like it's hard to find this ascension without its existence), if not both of his first two ascensions, but if they're not nuked per forum #376832 i guess they should be implied. Skipping imply miyamoto_musashi_(male)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate) for being a false positive.