FGO requests

Posted under Tags

BUR #45678 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication indra_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> indra_(fate)
create implication ishtar_(fgo_x_lawson_2020)_(fate) -> ishtar_(fate)
create implication ishtar_(grand_journey)_(fate) -> ishtar_(fate)
create implication ishtar_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> ishtar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(battle_president)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(casual_wear)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(loppi_hmv_rider)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(muscle_bullet)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)
create implication iskandar_(waku_waku_colorful_ericeland)_(fate) -> iskandar_(fate)

BURs 70~72 from forum #376779.
While on the subject of Iskandar, people familiar with Fate/Extella &c please tell me what the costume in post #7338502 is called/create a tag for it? I can tell there's official merchandise for it so its clearly an official alternate costume but I was struggling to find any documentation on what it's called.

BUR #45679 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Show

create implication ivan_the_terrible_(muscle_bullet)_(fate) -> ivan_the_terrible_(fate)
create implication jaguarman_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> jaguarman_(fate)
create implication jason_(kyomaf_2020)_(fate) -> jason_(fate)
create implication jason_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> jason_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_(animate_cafe)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_(animejapan_2024)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_(schoolgirl_blazer)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_alter_(animate_cafe)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_alter_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_alter_(fgo_x_takarazuka_kinen)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_alter_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_alter_(kyomaf_2024)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_alter_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_alter_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_alter_(fate)

BURs 73~77 from forum #376779. unrelated but shout out to user #508969 for consistently uploading female focus craft essences including the ones from the celebratory attire series except for jaguarman instead uploading tutankhamun i guess?

BUR #45680 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication johanna_(a_reward_for_your_studies)_(fate) -> johanna_(fate)
create implication johanna_(event_portrait)_(fate) -> johanna_(fate)
create implication kama_(comiket_100)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(comiket_104)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(comiket_96)_(fate) -> kama_(young)_(fate)
create implication kama_(fgo_x_lawson_2023)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(male)_(fate) -> kama_(fate)
create implication kama_(otaku-friendly_gyaru)_(fate) -> kama_(teenager)_(fate)
create implication kama_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> kama_(young)_(fate)

BURs 78~79 from forum #376779. Implying each of the Kama costumes to her respective ascensions. Oh hey, now we're reaching the ones I didn't imply in the last batch.

BUR #45689 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication kyokutei_bakin_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication kyokutei_bakin_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> kyokutei_bakin_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(holy_blue)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)
create implication lakshmibai_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> lakshmibai_(fate)

BURs 91 & 94 from forum #376779.
Skipping Kyokutei Bakin (Past) for being a tag I'm not sure should exist in the first place, but it definitely shouldn't be implicated to the main tag even if it sticks around.
Skipping BUR 92 because topic #32320 never went anywhere.
Skipping BUR 93 because the Laeticia/Jeanne d'Arc split is a mess.

BUR #45694 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Show

create implication marie_antoinette_(open_stage)_(fate) -> marie_antoinette_(fate)
create implication marie_antoinette_(still_in_the_middle_of_the_trip)_(fate) -> marie_antoinette_(fate)
create implication marie_antoinette_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> marie_antoinette_(fate)
create implication marie_antoinette_alter_(exhibition_attire)_(fate) -> marie_antoinette_alter_(fate)
create implication marie_antoinette_alter_(kyomaf_2024)_(fate) -> marie_antoinette_alter_(fate)
create implication marie_antoinette_alter_(mysterious_forest)_(fate) -> marie_antoinette_alter_(fate)
create implication marine_nemo_(sprite_albion)_(fate) -> marine_nemo_(fate)
create implication martha_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> martha_(fate)
create implication mary_anning_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> mary_anning_(fate)
create implication mary_anning_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> mary_anning_(fate)
create implication mary_anning_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> mary_anning_(fate)

BURs 106~110 from forum #376779. Guess I'll include implicating Anning's second ascension even if I think it should be exploded (forum #376444) because if that BUR succeeds the implication will be removed anyways and if it fails the implication will need to be made.

BUR #45695 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication mary_read_(pirates_of_the_jungle)_(fate) -> mary_read_(fate)
create implication mary_read_(snow_pirates)_(fate) -> mary_read_(fate)
create implication mata_hari_(be_shelved)_(fate) -> mata_hari_(fate)
create implication mata_hari_(guiding_the_lily)_(fate) -> mata_hari_(fate)
create implication medb_(fgo_x_lawson_2017)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medb_(maidens'_luncheon)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medb_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medb_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)
create implication medea_lily_(bestia_del_sol)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(fate)
create implication medea_lily_(witches'_kitchen)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(fate)

BURs 111, 113, 116~117 from forum #26405. Don't feel like dealing with the Matous in BUR 114/115 right now. Circling back to Mash in my next request.

BUR #45696 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Show

create implication mash_kyrielight_(alter)_(fgo_alternative) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(applause_of_roses) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(genji's_formal_clothes) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(goddess'_frills) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(highlands_veil) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(land_of_shadows_dancer) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(night_blue) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(ogre_metal_punkish) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(piko_piko_pharaoh) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(swan_of_orleans) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(swordswoman_formal) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(tears_of_a_jet_black_witch) -> mash_kyrielight
create implication mash_kyrielight_(u-fou_catcher) -> mash_kyrielight

BUR 112 from forum #376779. Mash Kyrielight (Alter) (FGO Alternative) is probably the most contentious one here but all two posts of it are already tagged with Mash Kyrielight anyways so its a moot point imo. I need to update the main gallery for Mash Kyrielight in general but also with the Fate/Grand Order Waltz in the Moonlight/Lostroom costumes specifically. I'll do that after I eat lunch. BUR first, lunch later, gallery laterest.

Ylimegirl said:

BUR 112 from forum #376779. Mash Kyrielight (Alter) (FGO Alternative) is probably the most contentious one here but all two posts of it are already tagged with Mash Kyrielight anyways so its a moot point imo. I need to update the main gallery for Mash Kyrielight in general but also with the Fate/Grand Order Waltz in the Moonlight/Lostroom costumes specifically. I'll do that after I eat lunch. BUR first, lunch later, gallery laterest.

If Mash Alter is OC then wouldn't Mash Kyrielight + alter servant do the job?

elchocoloco said:

If Mash Alter is OC then wouldn't Mash Kyrielight + alter servant do the job?

mash_kyrielight alter_servant give a whole lot of different fan designs for that concept. mash_kyrielight fate/grand_order_alternative on the other hand gives the same results, but IDK enough about FGOA to know if that's always going to work (and the user who made the wiki page &c for it has since expunged their account (again), so I guess I'd have to do research.)

Updated by Ylimegirl

BUR #45706 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(muscle_bullet)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication minamoto_no_tametomo_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> minamoto_no_tametomo_(fate)
create implication miyamoto_iori_(riceball_remnant)_(fate) -> miyamoto_iori_(fate)
create implication miyamoto_musashi_(exhibition_attire)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate)
create implication miyamoto_musashi_(fgo_x_pasela_resorts)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate)

BURs 127~129 from forum #376779. Still think Minamoto no Tametomo (First Ascension) at the very least should be exploded (it makes up 34 posts of his 64-post tag, it's not like it's hard to find this ascension without its existence), if not both of his first two ascensions, but if they're not nuked per forum #376832 i guess they should be implied. Skipping imply miyamoto_musashi_(male)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate) for being a false positive.

1 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 80