Posted under Tags
nonamethanks said:
I ran the bot again to check how many BURs were left, because surely a good amount of them has been removed at this point and FUCK there's more than when we started.
If every CE counts as an alternate costume and gets its own tag then the influx is never going to end. Given that users can already create new tags entirely, maybe the load could be alleviated by letting them add implications as well?
elchocoloco said:
If every CE counts as an alternate costume and gets its own tag then the influx is never going to end. Given that users can already create new tags entirely, maybe the load could be alleviated by letting them add implications as well?
Anyone can submit implication requests.
BUR #45657 has been rejected.
nuke minamoto_no_tametomo_(first_ascension)_(fate)
nuke minamoto_no_tametomo_(second_ascension)_(fate)
My man has a grand total 64 posts after being released for 3 years. He doesn't need tags for all his individual ascensions. Minamoto no Tametomo (Third Ascension) is related to his Noble Phantasm and is distinct enough in appearance to be separate imo.
BUR #45661 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication achilles_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> achilles_(fate)
create implication achilles_(climbing_battle)_(fate) -> achilles_(fate)
create implication achilles_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> achilles_(fate)
create implication alexander_(fgo_x_takarazuka_kinen)_(fate) -> alexander_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(english_ver._3rd_anniversary)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(voices_from_the_one_who_waits)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)
create implication anne_bonny_(pirates_of_the_jungle)_(fate) -> anne_bonny_(fate)
create implication antonio_salieri_(fgo_fes._2022)_(fate) -> antonio_salieri_(fate)
create implication antonio_salieri_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> antonio_salieri_(fate)
BURs 1~6 from forum #376779. Are you excited for the BUR count to skyrocket again? I'm excited for the BUR count to skyrocket again.
ETA: Removed create implication agravain_(with_my_family)_(fate) -> agravain_(fate) since it's already covered by forum #376791.
Updated by Ylimegirl
BUR #45662 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication aphrodite_(machine_god)_(fate) -> aphrodite_(fate)
create implication arash_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> arash_(fate)
create implication archer_(casual_wear)_(fate) -> archer_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(type-moon_ace_vol._13)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_alter_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> arjuna_alter_(fate)
create implication arjuna_alter_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> arjuna_alter_(fate)
create implication arjuna_alter_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> arjuna_alter_(fate)
create implication arthur_pendragon_(into_the_spring)_(fate) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)
BURs 7~12 from forum #376779.
BUR #45663 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias abigail_williams_(fgo_fes._2025)_(fate) -> abigail_williams_(celebratory_attire)_(fate)
create alias caenis_(fgo_fes._2025)_(fate) -> caenis_(celebratory_attire)_(fate)
create alias johanna_(fgo_fes._2025)_(fate) -> johanna_(celebratory_attire)_(fate)
oh no! i forgot abby, and caenis, and johanna!!! :(
Updated by Ylimegirl
BUR #45666 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication artoria_pendragon_(lancer)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> artoria_pendragon_(lancer)_(fate)
#14 in forum #376779. Artoria Pendragon (Lancer) (First Ascension) implies Artoria Pendragon (Lancer).
#13 is a big one so I’ll leave it to the experts to check if everything’s correct. For example #45 doesn’t seem right.
BUR #45667 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication artoria_caster_(chinese_ver._new_year_2025)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate)
create implication artoria_caster_(english_ver._6th_anniversary)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate)
create implication artoria_caster_(final_ascension)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate)
create implication artoria_caster_(new_year_2022)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate)
create implication artoria_caster_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate)
create implication artoria_caster_(the_glow_of_dawn)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate)
Expert here! BUR 13 from forum #376779. Looks right to me (though BUR 45 is in fact a false positive). My only thing is that I think some of her costumes should be implied directly to her third ascension, but that's 4 levels of implication (altria <- castria <- altria avalon <- specific costume) so that's less likely to be approved.
BUR #45668 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication ashiya_douman_(brd)_(fate) -> ashiya_douman_(fate)
create implication ashwatthama_(blowin'_in_the_twilight_wind)_(fate) -> ashwatthama_(fate)
create implication ashwatthama_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> ashwatthama_(fate)
create implication astolfo_(comp_ace_bikini)_(fate) -> astolfo_(fate)
create implication astolfo_(fgo_fes._2020)_(fate) -> astolfo_(fate)
create implication astolfo_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> astolfo_(fate)
create implication atalanta_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> atalanta_(fate)
create implication avicebron_(class_under_the_blue_sky)_(fate) -> avicebron_(fate)
create implication barghest_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> barghest_(fate)
create implication bartholomew_roberts_(kyomaf_2020)_(fate) -> bartholomew_roberts_(fate)
create implication bartholomew_roberts_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> bartholomew_roberts_(fate)
BURs 16~22 from forum #376779.
BUR #45669 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication bb_(flower_parade)_(fate) -> bb_(fate)
create implication bb_(wada_arco_exhibition)_(fate) -> bb_(fate)
create implication bedivere_(rounds_beach)_(fate) -> bedivere_(fate)
create implication bedivere_(rounds_on_ice)_(fate) -> bedivere_(fate)
create implication beowulf_(dragon_hunting)_(fate) -> beowulf_(fate)
create implication beowulf_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> beowulf_(fate)
create implication bhima_(brothers_special)_(fate) -> bhima_(fate)
create implication billy_the_kid_(sunset_jam)_(fate) -> billy_the_kid_(fate)
create implication billy_the_kid_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> billy_the_kid_(fate)
BURs 23~27 from forum #26405.
BUR #45670 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication caenis_(chaldea_delinquents)_(fate) -> caenis_(fate)
create implication caenis_(hawatoria_pavilion)_(fate) -> caenis_(fate)
create implication caenis_(jk_move)_(fate) -> caenis_(fate)
create implication caenis_(unofficial_casual_wear)_(fate) -> caenis_(fate)
create implication captain_nemo_(delivery_healing)_(fate) -> captain_nemo_(fate)
create implication captain_nemo_(grand_journey)_(fate) -> captain_nemo_(fate)
create implication carmilla_(desert_maiden)_(fate) -> carmilla_(fate)
create implication charlemagne_(bright_blue)_(fate) -> charlemagne_(fate)
create implication charlotte_corday_(final_ascension)_(fate) -> charlotte_corday_(fate)
BURs 28~32 from forum #376779.
BUR #45671 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication chen_gong_(turning_of_tides)_(fate) -> chen_gong_(fate)
create implication child_gilgamesh_(over_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> child_gilgamesh_(fate)
create implication child_gilgamesh_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> child_gilgamesh_(fate)
create implication christopher_columbus_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> christopher_columbus_(fate)
create implication christopher_columbus_(the_final_case)_(fate) -> christopher_columbus_(fate)
create implication circe_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> circe_(fate)
create implication circe_(mushrooming)_(fate) -> circe_(fate)
create implication constantine_xi_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> constantine_xi_(fate)
create implication constantine_xi_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> constantine_xi_(fate)
BURs 33~37 from forum #376779.
There doesn't seem to be a tag for grand servants and their respective crown (e.g. post #9779893 ). Should I create a grand_servant tag or a grand_xxx tag for each class/category?
BUR #45672 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication cu_chulainn_alter_(pop_up_shop)_(fate) -> cu_chulainn_alter_(fate)
create implication demeter_(machine_god)_(fate) -> demeter_(fate)
create implication dobrynya_nikitich_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> dobrynya_nikitich_(fate)
create implication edmond_dantes_(animate_cafe)_(fate) -> edmond_dantes_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(fgo_fes._2019)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication emiya_kiritsugu_(being_in_the_same_boat) -> emiya_kiritsugu_(assassin)
create implication enkidu_(midsummer_moment)_(fate) -> enkidu_(fate)
create implication ereshkigal_(fgo_x_lawson_2020)_(fate) -> ereshkigal_(fate)
create implication ereshkigal_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> ereshkigal_(fate)
BURs 39~40, 44, 46~48, 50~51.
Skipping BUR 38 because topic #32414 hasn't gone anywhere.
Skipping BUR 41~43 because I still stand by what I said in forum #363799, but that might not be a consensus so that should be handled separately.
Skipping 45 for being a false positive.
Implying Emiya Kiritsugu (Being In The Same Boat) to Emiya Kiritsugu (Assassin) because skintone + hair color.
Skipping BUR 49 because I still don't want to deal with making a gallery page for Emiya Shirou.
elchocoloco said:
There doesn't seem to be a tag for grand servants and their respective crown (e.g. post #9779893 ). Should I create a grand_servant tag or a grand_xxx tag for each class/category?
I was just thinking some sort of Grand Servant (fate/grand order) tag might be in order for all the fanart we're getting of servants related to the new grand servant mechanic. If the crowns are different for each class then different tags are in order for each class, but if the crowns all look similar enough they can probably just go under one umbrella tag.
BUR #45673 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication europa_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> europa_(fate)
create implication europa_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> europa_(fate)
create implication fujimaru_ritsuka_(female)_(animate_cafe) -> fujimaru_ritsuka_(female)
create implication fujimaru_ritsuka_(female)_(concept_dress) -> fujimaru_ritsuka_(female)
create implication fuuma_kotarou_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> fuuma_kotarou_(fate)
create implication galatea_(artisanal_soul)_(fate) -> galatea_(fate)
create implication gawain_(rounds_on_ice)_(fate) -> gawain_(fate)
create implication gawain_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> gawain_(fate)
BURs 52~57 from forum #376779. ETA: Removed create implication gareth_(with_my_family)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate) and create implication gawain_(with_my_family)_(fate) -> gawain_(fate), both are already covered by forum #376791.
Updated by Ylimegirl
BUR #45674 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication geronimo_(sunset_jam)_(fate) -> geronimo_(fate)
create implication gilgamesh_(fgo_x_lawson_2020)_(fate) -> gilgamesh_(caster)_(fate)
create implication goredolf_musik_(english_ver._3rd_anniversary) -> goredolf_musik
create implication habetrot_(blessed_bride)_(fate) -> habetrot_(fate)
create implication habetrot_(fgo_fes._2022)_(fate) -> habetrot_(fate)
create implication habetrot_(fgo_mart)_(fate) -> habetrot_(fate)
create implication habetrot_(little_tailors)_(fate) -> habetrot_(fate)
create implication hassan_of_serenity_(mushrooming)_(fate) -> hassan_of_serenity_(fate)
create implication hassan_of_serenity_(secret_company_assassin)_(fate) -> hassan_of_serenity_(fate)
BURs 58~62 from forum #376779.
Implying Gilgamesh (FGO X Lawson 2020) to Gilgamesh (Caster) for hopefully self-explanatory reasons.
Ylimegirl said:
I was just thinking some sort of Grand Servant (fate/grand order) tag might be in order for all the fanart we're getting of servants related to the new grand servant mechanic. If the crowns are different for each class then different tags are in order for each class, but if the crowns all look similar enough they can probably just go under one umbrella tag.
Thank you.
BUR #45675 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication hector_(the_everlasting_troy)_(fate) -> hector_(fate)
create implication helena_blavatsky_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> helena_blavatsky_(fate)
create implication heracles_(princess_in_silks)_(fate) -> heracles_(fate)
create implication hijikata_toshizou_(chaldea_detectives)_(fate) -> hijikata_toshizou_(fate)
create implication hijikata_toshizou_(demonic_parade)_(fate) -> hijikata_toshizou_(fate)
create implication hijikata_toshizou_(oni_tea_ceremony)_(fate) -> hijikata_toshizou_(fate)
create implication hijikata_toshizou_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> hijikata_toshizou_(fate)
create implication hyde_(fgo_fes._2019)_(fate) -> hyde_(fate)
BURs 63~64, 66~68 from forum #376779.
Skipping BUR 65 for being a false positive.
BUR #45676 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication ibaraki_douji_(chaldea_gaming_binge)_(fate) -> ibaraki_douji_(swimsuit_lancer)_(first_ascension)_(fate)
create implication ibaraki_douji_(pioneering_onis)_(fate) -> ibaraki_douji_(swimsuit_lancer)_(first_ascension)_(fate)
create implication ibaraki_douji_(pop_up_shop)_(fate) -> ibaraki_douji_(fate)
create implication ibaraki_douji_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> ibaraki_douji_(fate)
BUR 69 from forum #376779. Implying her first two costumes to Ibaraki Douji (Swimsuit Lancer) (First Ascension) for having the same bikini.
