The bulk update request #49118 (forum #392571) has been approved by @evazion.
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #49118 (forum #392571) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49201 (forum #392854) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #49718 has been rejected.
create implication edelgard_von_hresvelg_(adrestian_emperor)_(resplendent) -> edelgard_von_hresvelg_(timeskip)
Upcoming official alternate costume from Fire Emblem Heroes
BUR #49719 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication female_corrin_(fate_dragon)_(fire_emblem) -> female_corrin_(fire_emblem)
Upcoming official alternate design from Fire Emblem Shadows
ls1547 said:
BUR #49718 has been rejected.
create implication edelgard_von_hresvelg_(adrestian_emperor)_(resplendent) -> edelgard_von_hresvelg_(timeskip)
Upcoming official alternate costume from Fire Emblem Heroes
This is another case of a four-level deep hierarchy for a single character:
The outfit itself is basically just a palette swap of an existing costume:
So we're implying an alternate costume to an alternate costume to an alternate form to the base character. Can we just make it Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Resplendent Adrestian Emperor) instead and have it directly imply Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Timeskip)? That would cut down on qualifiers and implication depth.
The bulk update request #49719 (forum #394847) has been approved by @evazion.
evazion said:
This is another case of a four-level deep hierarchy for a single character:
The outfit itself is basically just a palette swap of an existing costume:
So we're implying an alternate costume to an alternate costume to an alternate form to the base character. Can we just make it Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Resplendent Adrestian Emperor) instead and have it directly imply Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Timeskip)? That would cut down on qualifiers and implication depth.
Personally I am fine with it either way, but I get the argument that having that many levels of qualifiers and implications, in the case of a single character like Edelgard or the young Tiki legendary dragon resplendent further above can begin to feel a bit esoteric and contrived. I do think the character tag is fine the way it is even if the implication changes to directly imply Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Timeskip), but if anybody disagrees they can say so and I am also willing to change that if people think that Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Resplendent Adrestian Emperor) would be better than Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Adrestian Emperor) (Resplendent).
Why not imply Edelgard von Hresvelg (Adrestian Emperor) directly to Edelgard von Hresvelg instead? Adrestian Emperor is a costume so it's possible to draw pre-timeskip Edelgard wearing it and then the current implication is invalid.
BUR #49811 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication mareeta_(the_blade's_pawn)_(fire_emblem) -> mareeta_(fire_emblem)
beep boop
This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.
NNTBot said:
BUR #49811 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication mareeta_(the_blade's_pawn)_(fire_emblem) -> mareeta_(fire_emblem)
This looks identical to her regular appearance except she's holding Shadow Sword and has an aura. I guess her eyes are a different color.
BUR #49862 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication lucina_(hot-spring_scramble)_(fire_emblem) -> lucina_(fire_emblem)
create implication severa_(hot-spring_scramble)_(fire_emblem) -> severa_(fire_emblem)
beep boop
This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.
The bulk update request #49862 (forum #395398) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #49914 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication chrom_(summer_scramble)_(fire_emblem) -> chrom_(fire_emblem)
beep boop
This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.
The bulk update request #49914 (forum #395597) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #49926 has been rejected.
nuke celica_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke sigurd_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke roy_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke lyn_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke micaiah_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke lucina_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke female_corrin_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke male_byleth_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke edelgard_von_hresvelg_(emblem)
nuke dimitri_alexandre_blaiddyd_(emblem)
nuke claude_von_riegan_(emblem)
nuke hector_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke camilla_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke chrom_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke male_robin_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
nuke veronica_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
i believe these ones to be only distinct through the presence of auras and sometimes official alternate color.
1. celica (fire emblem) + Fire Emblem Echoes: Shadows Of Valentia
2. base design
3. base design
4. base design with a bow (weapon)
5. base design
6. base design
7. female default design
8. male base design
9. base design
10. pre timeskip design
11. pre timeskip design
12. base design
13. base design
14. base design
15. male default design
16. veronica_(princess_rising)_(fire_emblem)
most of the others are essentially the same but have some detail differences that you could argue are a distinct design
there is no information on the wikis how to identify these, and they seem to be tagged based on 'a blue aura' or 'red hair'
the Chrom wiki uses post #7729679 as an example; the only way you can tell here is because ENGAGE is written in the picture.
Updated by tamuraakemi
BUR #50299 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication male_shez_(ninja_mercenary)_(fire_emblem) -> male_shez_(fire_emblem)
create implication female_shez_(covert_mercenary)_(fire_emblem) -> female_shez_(fire_emblem)
create implication yunaka_(stealthy_imitator)_(fire_emblem) -> yunaka_(fire_emblem)
create implication hrid_(frigid_ninja)_(fire_emblem) -> hrid_(fire_emblem)
create implication kvasir_(hidden_in_time)_(fire_emblem) -> kvasir_(fire_emblem)
create implication gullveig_(hidden_in_time)_(fire_emblem) -> gullveig_(fire_emblem)
This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.
The bulk update request #48339 (forum #389569) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.
The bulk update request #48754 (forum #391044) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.