Posted under General
ion288 said in forum #424042:
post #10887151 and parent. Flagged without tagging. Refers to post #9843623 which has not been discussed here. Is this an artist that sometimes uses AI assistance?
Previous discussion about this artist: forum #378990, forum #379076
https://x.com/YuuriAmemiyaP/status/2035231499948380161/
Thoughts? Their Pixiv is full of AI stuff. While this is a subaccount, I'm not sure if these were drawn by hand as claimed or just AI-assisted pics.
MaskedAvenger said in forum #424166:
https://x.com/YuuriAmemiyaP/status/2035231499948380161/
Thoughts? Their Pixiv is full of AI stuff. While this is a subaccount, I'm not sure if these were drawn by hand as claimed or just AI-assisted pics.
The plaid pattern on her shawl looks very suspicious to me.
user #1521695
ssaarts
Requesting a check on all of the uploads by this user. Three Sora uploads were tagged as AI on pixiv but it seems like they stopped using the tag at that point, so I'm suspicious of anything they're posting.
ToxicOrochi said in forum #424303:
user #1521695
ssaarts
Requesting a check on all of the uploads by this user. Three Sora uploads were tagged as AI on pixiv but it seems like they stopped using the tag at that point, so I'm suspicious of anything they're posting.
Very clear and obvious AI usage.
The weird hair and the inconsistent patterns on the outfits.
This post #11010867 rubs me the wrong way, specifically the pattern on her shirt being completely asymmetrical
The other image of this girl by this artist doesn't have the asymmetrical pattern post #9114033
Is it AI? The collars on post #10941737 and post #9037051 also look weird to me.
zetsubousensei said in forum #424420:
This post #11010867 rubs me the wrong way, specifically the pattern on her shirt being completely asymmetrical
The other image of this girl by this artist doesn't have the asymmetrical pattern post #9114033
Is it AI? The collars on post #10941737 and post #9037051 also look weird to me.
I think it just bad drawing.
pretty sure aijalon is notably ai-assisted cnsidering he doesn't seem to hide the use of ai in his work.
https://x.com/Aijalon_Plz/status/1941891897988960305
Cophocoa said in forum #424741:
pretty sure aijalon is notably ai-assisted cnsidering he doesn't seem to hide the use of ai in his work.
https://x.com/Aijalon_Plz/status/1941891897988960305
I mean in that case yeah it's definitely ai-assisted if they straight up admitted it.
The fact they were taking comms is slimy though, even if not fully ai generated
dush_1154 is obviously ai-generated, I have no idea why they are constantly spotted in the hot section
vivrose_a said in forum #424831:
dush_1154 is obviously ai-generated, I have no idea why they are constantly spotted in the hot section
What exactly is so obvious? I see nothing in their art that makes me suspicious. And no, vibes or style are not proof.
Banqiu (artist #217335) was the character artist for this new game "Kotama and Academy Citadel", and there's been some talk about the art looking like AI was used for it.
I could see ai-assisted possibly being the case, but I honestly have no clue
A person pointed out some details in screenshots here: https://steamcommunity.com/app/3639650/discussions/0/684118412578843761/
Updated by Nezzen
Sachi Wakamo appears to be Kyuort who was discussed earlier in this thread (forum #412364). Weirdly the mention of AI prompting was removed from the wiki before the old artist was deleted (https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_page_versions/863632)? Damian readded that note in (https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_page_versions/863789), and then it was removed again (https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_page_versions/864390).
The hair in post #10973945 looks a little weird, top middle where the purple hair kind of looks weird. The visual style and resolution is also the same as kyuort.
I'm quite suspicious of post #11026014 being traced AI. Even looking at the artist's Pixiv, they have a history of mostly normal art that looks perfectly human, even some that has been upped (post #9761036), but this one suddenly has the classic AI sheen, pose, and some other issues:
This, in combination with some basic but normalish brushwork (asset #47178247, asset #47178245) and the artist's history of making normal-looking art makes me believe it's traced/overdrawn AI.
Updated by ANON TOKYO
ANON_TOKYO said in forum #424898:
- The hair stick disappears here behind the hair in a place that wouldnt make senseasset #47178208
There’s a typo here. asset #47178208
Hi, Is this AI, I've already posted or almost posted a few that I can't tell. This one even zooming all the way in I don't find anything weird but not an artist, no clue how yall notice those. Just asking because the style is different from previous works and no artist tag her this artist.
Researcher said in forum #425121:
Hi, Is this AI, I've already posted or almost posted a few that I can't tell. This one even zooming all the way in I don't find anything weird but not an artist, no clue how yall notice those. Just asking because the style is different from previous works and no artist tag her this artist.
There are a lot of precise lines, even in the small details. Those are the things AI really struggles with, so it's a clear sign of human involvement. It's very likely to be human in my opinion.
Researcher said in forum #425121:
Hi, Is this AI, I've already posted or almost posted a few that I can't tell. This one even zooming all the way in I don't find anything weird but not an artist, no clue how yall notice those. Just asking because the style is different from previous works and no artist tag her this artist.
Did you see this?
https://x.com/vlaxophone/status/2000214861855568010
Placeholder1996 said in forum #425135:
There are a lot of precise lines, even in the small details. Those are the things AI really struggles with, so it's a clear sign of human involvement. It's very likely to be human in my opinion.
Nezzen said in forum #425246:
Did you see this?
https://x.com/vlaxophone/status/2000214861855568010
Thank you, and no I hadn't thought to check their other socials.
Is there any good AI image checker online? I've tried a few sometimes, but it they don't agree witth each other, some will same AI and some not for same image
Researcher said in forum #425251:
Is there any good AI image checker online? I've tried a few sometimes, but it they don't agree witth each other, some will same AI and some not for same image
AI image checkers exist online, but aren't very reliable. If you want to be certain that something's generated, you've got to find signs of AI usage.
