AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

FrostedLeaf

aster1a said:

As you said, this looks out of place. Perhaps they started using another AI. Apart from certain details which look like squiggles on her clothes, what stands out the most to me is her bangs trying to merge with her eyelashes and failing.

Yeah it looks like the hair around her eyes is merging with the eyelashes
i also just realized that the post that was brought up, post #9289416 this one, was self uploaded
Honestly considering the post that i mentioned that was out of place, im tempted to flag it but im not sure

Edit: also the post that i brought up earlier, there's three buttons on the clothes when there should be a fourth lol

Reply
user 1350253

CarsonOng said:

post #9315871

I'm having suspicions about this artist, the pokeball button seems a bit out of shape. Mayhaps AI-Assisted ?

There are some sketches posted in the Twitter profile of the source. Not sure if that proves anything, but I suspect the artist is simply using AI assistance.

Reply
GreyOmega

VR-Man said:

masorg

Need a second check for this artist.

The user is definitely using AI to some degree. pixiv #116404178 for example the fine line patterns such as on Klee's skirt are complete gibberish, despite being them supposed to be a simple flower knot shape. Also oddities likes the second image showing Klee from behind, the hat is now on backwards and her short twintails have become sidelocks that'd be in front of the ears.

Even with their most recent pixiv #127083525 there are oddities such as the hair merging into the collar in the first image or the weird things on his leg and affixed to the shin strap in the second image or the gibberish icon in the vision. The shin strap thing I can only assume was supposed to be the flower knot like in post #4146453. In general all the images of theirs showing a vision tends to have a gibberish pattern inside of it. Also any details in outfit designs tend to be gnarled and off when you observe them closely, despite the art style trying to be appear detailed.

Reply
FrostedLeaf

GreyOmega said:

The user is definitely using AI to some degree. pixiv #116404178 for example the fine line patterns such as on Klee's skirt are complete gibberish, despite being them supposed to be a simple flower knot shape. Also oddities likes the second image showing Klee from behind, the hat is now on backwards and her short twintails have become sidelocks that'd be in front of the ears.

Even with their most recent pixiv #127083525 there are oddities such as the hair merging into the collar in the first image or the weird things on his leg and affixed to the shin strap in the second image or the gibberish icon in the vision. The shin strap thing I can only assume was supposed to be the flower knot like in post #4146453. In general all the images of theirs showing a vision tends to have a gibberish pattern inside of it. Also any details in outfit designs tend to be gnarled and off when you observe them closely, despite the art style trying to be appear detailed.

Someone just marked them all as AI Generated (without flagging?)
If we're confident in flagging these i can do so, it looks off to me so im willing to believe it is AI in some form

Reply
WRS

ai-tracker said:

post #9350843

this artist has a long history of quality work but for some reason this one screams ai. I don't know if it's the hearts that every ai image uses or if it's the white motion lines around the character but something is off.

That is one entirely arbitrary and random assessment.

Reply
1 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 237