Loli/shota check thread.

yes, i agree. nothing is impossible for a persistent user. however, this might pose an impact directly to the system, if abused, since there are plenty of ad-based accounts. and i checked, even anonymous users can see it.

i think we can save site activity if no reference query was made right at the very start (the related tag count and the absolute address) for less privileged and anonymous accounts. i understand if they will be redirected instead to an external link than clicking the site repository.

NeoChaos said:
post #941187

Not sexually explicit enough to tag it.

Cyberia-Mix said:
post #665843
post #939627

post #665843, can't tell what her figure is like at that angle.
post #939627 and its child post are both loli, though a bit less so than some.

sgcdonmai said:
post #665843, can't tell what her figure is like at that angle.

Given the size of her head and the apparent shape of her hips I'd have thought we see enough.

post #930844

Cyberia-Mix said:
Given the size of her head and the apparent shape of her hips I'd have thought we see enough.

The camera angle may be interfering with that, though it is dubious.
Bottom line, I wouldn't add the tag, but I wouldn't remove it if it was added by someone else.

post #930844: loli, and the wrong bust size tag given. Fixed.

Unfortunately, one of the tags in that image implicates breasts (underboob, I believe), so it's stuck with both flat_chest and breasts.

Algasir said:
Unfortunately, one of the tags in that image implicates breasts (underboob, I believe), so it's stuck with both flat_chest and breasts.

Ah, you're right. underboob does implicate breasts.

post #941933
I'm leaning towards yes on this one.

post #884899

psich said:
post #941933
I'm leaning towards yes on this one.

I'm not, at all. The only thing loli about that one is the bust. Everything else is just a slender teenager.

Cyberia-Mix said:
post #884899

Tagged.

post #944958

Added the tag just in case

Krugger said:
post #944958

Added the tag just in case

Rightly so. Have to send that one to the mod queue, though, because the quality of it seems questionable.

can't tell if post #947786 should be loli or not. certain images from pool #3156 have been getting the loli tag so i want to know which images should be loli or not.

Zekana said:
can't tell if post #947786 should be loli or not. certain images from pool #3156 have been getting the loli tag so i want to know which images should be loli or not.

Personally speaking, I wouldn't have accepted these images to begin with, but whatever.

In my opinion, it should be tagged loli, due to the body size, even though they have breasts.
I don't think this is merely a case of petite over a case of rbeasted loli.

post #948975

post #954835

Only lower half is shown, I thought might be loli and added tag but I want to make sure.

Krugger said:
post #954835

The age or body type of the character can't be determined by what's shown here.

post #955506

To me, the body seems a bit larger than what could be called loli, but tagged it anyways as a placebo for safe measure.

Edit: I was trying to say something along the lines of stopgap, I don't use placebo often, if ever, so I guess I was mistaken on its definition.

I'm not quite sure what you meant to say, but "placebo" is almost certainly not it. Unless this is somehow supposed to trick our bodies into generating a medical effect.

CodeKyuubi said:
post #955506

I see it as more petite than loli, given the length of the torso.

Hillside_Moose said:
I see it as more petite than loli, given the length of the torso.

Same, plus the leg length.