Faceless Male/Female tags

Question regarding use of them: I know the first sentence of the wiki for the male version goes "When a male's facial features (mainly eyes) don't appear, either covered by hair or shadowed by determinate angles; or rather, they don't exist at all." Now my question is this, if we know the identity of the person, would it still apply? I know my interpretation may be off from the intention, but i just want to clarify.

Edit: Grammar.

No, it's intended for effectively generic characters, if you can identify who it is then the tag doesn't apply.

You can simply use faceless alone for identifiable characters, but you will have to search faceless -faceless_male to find them again. (post #689574)

So post #809024 should have faceless, but not faceless male, then?

I suppose we could use faceless male/female to specify the sex of the faceless character but currently it's more used for generic characters. I don't know how we would sort generic characters from known identities if we did that though.

It'd be nice to create an entirely different tag for identified "faceless" characters, then make faceless_male/female->faceless ala hair_bow->bow.

missing_face? I'm not very creative in the synonym department.

no_face. Would be an extension of no_eyes.

Yeah, but any time I read no face, I think of [[kaonashi|a character from Sen to Chihiro no Kamikakushi.]]

S1eth said:
You can simply use faceless alone for identifiable characters, but you will have to search faceless -faceless_male to find them again. (post #689574)

I like that idea personally, and have the faceless_male and faceless_female imply the faceless tag.

Another idea I was thinking of was maybe using unknown_(fe)male because that would be more clear.