Posted under General
I wanted to point out that Moonwool is all ai-generated art, not ai-assisted.
From their Patreon: "Anime/Retro Art Style, making NSFW Art with AI tools"
On top of that, their Patreon posts are all 100+ image sets posted every two days, which is typical of ai-generated content. Ai-assisted art couldn't be pumped out like that
Updated by sakurada ichigo
Strong suspicion of multiple artists are using AI art models based on Mikozin's style:
nui_(nuinui0300) post #10567245
Lastly, gu_meng_yin has multiple artworks that go as far as using the exact same faces from some of Mikozin's pieces:
post #11728104 vs Mikozin's post #11641942
post #10248737 vs Mikozin's post #9087497
post #11680020 vs Mikozin's post #7338330
post #11756202 vs Mikozin's post #10674840
post #11291175 vs Mikozin's post #6032599
These artists could also be simply inspired by Mikozin, and I may be unfairly accusing them of using AI.
The timing and art history of these artists raising some flags for me, and I hope I can get some additional thoughts on this.
Squishy said in forum #454314:
Strong suspicion of multiple artists are using AI art models based on Mikozin's style:
I don't think these two are. They have illustrations from before AI was prevalent so they at least have some artistic capabilities of their own.
No idea about the other two. gu meng yin in particular looks similar enough to be img2img along with other oddities like the two straps on only one side of the bikini on post #11728104.
Sunrise4Me said in forum #454259:
ouch_0201
His stuff looks mostly human, but then there's this on https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/145075440I'm almost certain that this guy is either ai-assisted or ai-generated, but I can't find a similar artefact in any of his other works myself, so I would like a second or third opinion.
I think this guy is completely human. The text there and in pixiv #147144844 are strange, but I'll give them the benefit doubt and guess it's just because they're Korean. I also don't see any other problems in their art.
SalDWow said in forum #454301:
post #11766152 newer artist that joined Twitter in 2024. High output of fully rendered art with backgrounds and multiple characters. This one example seems particularly bad, lots of mistakes on the floral pattern in the kimono, weird blurry line in the carpet like the carpet has been thoroughly damaged. Seems like ai-assisted by using an AI to sharpen the original reference image and draw Mirko over it?
Yeah, I think you're right on this, but I'm not sure if it qualifies as ai-assisted. Assuming the original photo isn't AI, and it looks like AI was only used for upscaling or sharpening, does that count? Someone added ai-referenced, which I don't think is really accurate.
wavedash said in forum #454379:
Yeah, I think you're right on this, but I'm not sure if it qualifies as ai-assisted. Assuming the original photo isn't AI, and it looks like AI was only used for upscaling or sharpening, does that count? Someone added ai-referenced, which I don't think is really accurate.
It's a weird case since the reference image is 100% AI but I think just sharpening the image was used. Not sure what to think of this one.
