AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

hanwen1234

post #11758157

eyes are obviously fucked, glasses are weird, not amateur mistakes, definitely AI-generated

uploader only has 16 posts, joined on the 3rd of July this year, has only tried to upload this one "artist" by the name of sexyexxchi, who appears to be an art thief as they've posted stolen animations from other artists that don't even match with each other or even use the same *dimension* of artstyle; some of these are 3D-animations in entirely different engines

likely a bot attempting to push "their" name onto the rest. should blacklist anything tagged with sexyexxchi.

Reply
wavedash

hanwen1234 said in forum #453781:

post #11758157

eyes are obviously fucked, glasses are weird, not amateur mistakes, definitely AI-generated

uploader only has 16 posts, joined on the 3rd of July this year, has only tried to upload this one "artist" by the name of sexyexxchi, who appears to be an art thief as they've posted stolen animations from other artists that don't even match with each other or even use the same *dimension* of artstyle; some of these are 3D-animations in entirely different engines

likely a bot attempting to push "their" name onto the rest. should blacklist anything tagged with sexyexxchi.

Agreed that post looks like AI, however it's worth noting that they usually say in the commentary that they only added sound when uploading videos (though since they're all bad sources, I'm not sure "commentary" is strictly correct). Incidentally, I think this also suggests that they're all self-uploads

@sexyexxchi and @sexyexxchi2 are already banned as sockpuppets, I'm guessing @or552a is the same person.

Reply
hanwen1234

wavedash said in forum #453805:

Agreed that post looks like AI, however it's worth noting that they usually say in the commentary that they only added sound when uploading videos (though since they're all bad sources, I'm not sure "commentary" is strictly correct). Incidentally, I think this also suggests that they're all self-uploads

@sexyexxchi and @sexyexxchi2 are already banned as sockpuppets, I'm guessing @or552a is the same person.

Twice is a pattern, and those sockpuppets both have a month between their join dates which fits the pattern with @or552a, the new username is likely trying to evade detection. not that they're being very subtle since they're uploading to the same fucking tag.

Mods really should just blacklist the whole sexyexxchi tag if they're gonna keep doing this.

Reply
a haron

Unbreakable said in forum #453815:

post #6135411 came up in an unrelated discussion but the commentary mentions stuff like "Stable Diffusion", "img2img" and "AI".

Commentary are instructions on how to do img2img generation to get results like that from rough sketches, so... Yeah :-P

edit: I guess it depends on the rough sketches if it was AI generated or AI assisted, tho? This is the original that they fed to the IA, from the commentary:
https://imgur.com/qHANQQE

Reply
wavedash

7263 said in forum #453868:

Is houraku ai assisted or ai generated? Most of the images are are small in size and in post #11728840 the right hand artline sticking out like sore thumb like he's drawing over it. Also someone tagged ai gen but didn't flag on post #11680433, anyone can confirm it?

I'm the one who tagged AI-assisted on that Kisaki solo variant set - I think they just used AI for the variants, which I why I didn't tag the parent.

That 3girls post is really weird, but I don't think it's fully AI-generated. Kisaki looks out of place, her coloring is cooler than the other two's. Compare the color of their shoulders, she has a lot more grey while the other two are very pink. Kisaki's lines are overall a bit thicker and darker, compare their armpit creases. Her ass cheek crease looks horrible, but in a way that I don't think AI would do all by itself.

Reply
hanwen1234

post #11761856

I think Pixiqueenie's an AI artist; I've seen a lot of their recent posts and they just have the same "muscle girl on the cover of a fake magazine" premise with nearly the same headlines, and the backgrounds especially have that AI-gen look. It's especially notable with their Supergirl one, but even the background here looks off.

Also, the speech bubble on this overlaps with the moans, and not in a good way.

Reply
Diet Soda

hanwen1234 said in forum #453893:

post #11761856

I think Pixiqueenie's an AI artist; I've seen a lot of their recent posts and they just have the same "muscle girl on the cover of a fake magazine" premise with nearly the same headlines, and the backgrounds especially have that AI-gen look. It's especially notable with their Supergirl one, but even the background here looks off.

Also, the speech bubble on this overlaps with the moans, and not in a good way.

They've been brought up here before (forum #411285). pixiqueenie and yatagarasupen are almost certainly the same person (exact same style, same characters from the same franchises in the same scenes with the same "average rule34 comment"-style dialogue spoken in the same fonts in the same speech bubbles, same monetization sites, same chatGPT-written commentaries, they also RT each other constantly), likely splitting accounts to mask the inhuman output volume.

There's zero consistency or logic to how they 'draw' the characters' designs, Widowmaker's helmet in the post you linked is a good example (it's supposed to be symmetrical, not whatever melting mess that is), post #11760571 has the right arm splitting under the torso, and that's just two most recent posts. I tagged them ai-assisted because I guess they do (probably?) add the stupid speech bubbles by hand, but most of these images are likely much closer to generated, especially factoring in the above.

Reply
wavedash

ion288 said in forum #454118:

post #11765302

Flag without a tag, don't think colour schemes are AI artefacts.

I'm not sure what that flag is talking about regarding the walking stick, but I do think this artist is drawing over AI.

The base looks upscaled to me, this screenshot isn't zoomed in. Also, I think she has too many hair intakes, which is kind of weird

Reply
shemingwan wen

Alixiron said in forum #454181:

user_ardu5834. Has ai gen artifacts on asset #49158749 in the book (asset #49158754). Also posts with a very high frequency. Are all of the works upped ai generated?

twitter #2076242103802479022 has artifacts on the violin string, Reisen has two thumbs on her right hand and only four fingers on her left in post #11773959, the guitar in post #11684621 has four tuning pegs but has five strings at the start, only to end with four, the king of spades in twitter #2071261651685548351 has artifacts on the upside-down side and the queen of hearts on the table in the second post looks messy. Most of the posts likely have some AI involement

Reply
SalDWow

post #11766152 newer artist that joined Twitter in 2024. High output of fully rendered art with backgrounds and multiple characters. This one example seems particularly bad, lots of mistakes on the floral pattern in the kimono, weird blurry line in the carpet like the carpet has been thoroughly damaged. Seems like ai-assisted by using an AI to sharpen the original reference image and draw Mirko over it?

Reply
1 256 257 258 259 260 261