BUR #61401 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication dress_shoes -> shoes
Seems obvious enough
Posted under Tags
BUR #61401 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication dress_shoes -> shoes
Seems obvious enough
BUR #61404 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication monk_shoes -> dress_shoes
create implication oxfords -> dress_shoes
create implication saddle_shoes -> oxfords
I feel that it would make more sense to imply oxfords to dress shoes given that the dress shoes wiki lists them as an example and implying shoes for oxfords is redundant if dress shoes already implies shoes. Also, saddle shoes to oxfords since they are just a type of oxfords.
The bulk update request #61404 (forum #450470) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #61402 (forum #450428) has been rejected by @evazion.
The bulk update request #61401 (forum #450391) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #61519 has been approved by @evazion.
remove implication saddle_shoes -> shoes
Redundant since it implies shoes via saddle shoes -> oxfords -> dress shoes.
The bulk update request #61519 (forum #450930) has been approved by @evazion.
