dvvrk said in forum #448887:
Why wasn't this approved? Many other USA3710 post get accepted almost instantly.
Pretty bad anatomy. Tumor tits, crazy spine bend, tiny waist.
Posted under General
dvvrk said in forum #448887:
Why wasn't this approved? Many other USA3710 post get accepted almost instantly.
Pretty bad anatomy. Tumor tits, crazy spine bend, tiny waist.
Hi, could an Approver please explain why these posts weren’t approved? If possible, I’d appreciate having them looked at again for approval.
post #10132474
post #6471943
post #6619495
Updated by SidBarrett
This post is 2 days old so needs approval asap, thank you.
Hedginka said in forum #449457:
This post is 2 days old so needs approval asap, thank you.
No it doesn't. After 3 days you can consider asking for feedback, though you should generally appeal it first. After that, you're still not owed approval.
Original: sensitive: post #11579659
Is there a reason why this is not approved?
post #11544450
Any feedback for why it was deleted?
DNN4 said in forum #449645:
post #11544450
Any feedback for why it was deleted?
Back looks weird and compressed, artist tried to hard to get the ass visible.
Arknights endfield: general: post #11588079
Zenless zone zero: general post #11588093
Why are these video uploads not approved? Is there a reason why?
Hi, could an Approver please explain why these posts weren’t approved? If possible, I’d appreciate having them looked at again for approval.
post #6226100
post #6518591
post #6218269
post #7247121
Updated by SidBarrett
Can an approver explain why post #11552814 wasn't approved? It's the same quarter as the other posts by the same artist.
Hey, I'd like to know why
post #11588117
post #11588010
post #11594238 and
post #11594304 did not get approved so I can upload better artwork that'll get approved, thanks in advance
Duck8978 said in forum #448674:
I would like feedback on:
post #8166974
The artist has several similar pieces approved.post #10024791
post #9823415
post #11468782
I genuinely don't understand why they were rejected.post #11506694
The parent was approved.post #11506765
post #11506771
Same artist as the previous post.
Anyone...? I'm very confused.
Duck8978 said in forum #450580:
Anyone...? I'm very confused.
Proportions look bad on most of these. No opinion on the futa stuff as it's not my cup of tea.
NiceLittleDan said in forum #450581:
Proportions look bad on most of these.
Can you elaborate? Keeping stylistic choices/stylizations in mind, I honestly don't see it.
NiceLittleDan said in forum #450581:
No opinion on the futa stuff as it's not my cup of tea.
Surely a quality assessment would be somewhat independent of the content? I have noticed my futa posts tend to get approved less; they might just be accidentally of lower quality, but I do hope mods don't have personal biases when approving posts.
Updated by Duck8978
Duck8978 said in forum #450582:
Can you elaborate? Keeping stylistic choices/stylizations in mind, I honestly don't see it.
"Stylistic choices" isn't a silver bullet. I consider it when it's things like andaerz's art or the Panty & Stocking With Garterbelt artstyle where obviously the anatomy is cartoonish/unrealistic but doesn't necessarily detract from the image's quality.
post #8166974 has too much going on with the legs. The thighs are blasted fat into thin legs and the upper body is too small. Pixar mom body.
post #10024791 has an angle that makes the torso look compressed and the huge ass isn't doing any favours quality-wise.
post #9823415's photo background doesn't interact well with the characters slapped on top of it. It's okay-ish but I wouldn't approve it.
post #11468782 also has bad photo background interaction and again not a fan of the rest of the body compared to the ass-waist area.
The rest of them fall outside my thresholds for approval on looks. Nothing wrong stands out to me, I just don't think they're very good.
Surely a quality assessment would be somewhat independent of the content? I have noticed my futa posts tend to get approved less; they might just be accidentally of lower quality, but I do hope mods don't have personal biases when approving posts.
Approvers can't be forced to approve things they don't want to approve.
post #11599337 - sensitive
post #11593255 - general
Why was these not approved?
Updated by Rimuru Tempest
post #11594900
Similar in quality to the artist's other (earlier) work, e.g. post #11153458
post #11598313
Wondering why this one got deleted, less high resolution than other Outerplane pictures i've uploaded, but i wonder if there are any specific reasons it wasn't approved. Feedback would be helpful in order to know for future reference, especially if i decide to upload other Outerplane art from this same site, of which there is a lot.
post #11606255
I am also curious about this one, given Krass's art tends to be approved, i wondered why not this one compared to those before and after.
Kheas said in forum #450741:
post #11598313
Wondering why this one got deleted, less high resolution than other Outerplane pictures i've uploaded, but i wonder if there are any specific reasons it wasn't approved. Feedback would be helpful in order to know for future reference, especially if i decide to upload other Outerplane art from this same site, of which there is a lot.
90 degree spine while being able to support tankers out front kills it for me.