AI-generated art check thread

7263 said in forum #445889:

artist #649480 had been using ai with hindsight of his earlier pixiv post. Is post #11591029 still using ai? The mug decal is misaligned vertically with mug.

The Serika got ai flaws in her eyes and its a recent post

post #11591029 looks like entirely AI to me. Frills look bad, especially her hair tie. There's some minor weirdness in her sweater lines. Her hair has a lot of little problems:

Also note the left skin fang, which is canonically wrong, and also generally unusual.

I noticed artist “Artllatar” is tagged as an AI artist here but not on other boorus such as gelbooru and r34. Is there evidence for this? The artist is taking paid commissions and claims to draw and paint.

Aerolocke said in forum #447517:

I noticed artist “Artllatar” is tagged as an AI artist here but not on other boorus such as gelbooru and r34. Is there evidence for this? The artist is taking paid commissions and claims to draw and paint.

Seems to be the outcome of this discussion: forum #410190

I feel like ochazuke_(artist) is traced/AI-assisted

- Daily uploads of fully drawn art
- Messy lines look like traced (post #11584850 is very obvious)
- Shading and lineart skills seem to not match, but this can happen with humans too
- Never posts sketch, only uncolored versions of lineart

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/146022568
Is this artist an ai user or a legit one? I was about to upload his art but I hesitated at the last moment because it felt suspicious ig

chenonly has post #11555681 tagged as AI generated

ebiten_(pixiv_24714637) has lots of AI-gen artifacts, and got called out on twitter too:

post #9994513 has inconsistent strokes near eyelids, blush, and ears
post #11458693 has noticable flower design
post #11004664 ... whatever is this:

artms said in forum #447605:

I feel like ochazuke_(artist) is traced/AI-assisted

- Daily uploads of fully drawn art

Sukumizu is very easy to draw.

- Messy lines look like traced (post #11584850 is very obvious)
- Shading and lineart skills seem to not match, but this can happen with humans too

The artist was not drawing in 2024. Style changed.
And it can be explain why the artist can post 2 on 1 day.

- Never posts sketch, only uncolored versions of lineart

pixiv #130034621 (the start of current style)
post #11465860

-------------------------

But your suspections are not without merit:
post #11589599: Why kneehighs this time?
post #11465797: small tits.
And the artist was not drawing in 2024.

post #11592252
Flagged but not tagged. Is the comment valid?

post #9453626

Sorry if this has been discussed earlier or has its own thread, but I noticed that the posts under awaawaneko got flagged and deleted. A couple posts have corresponding WIPs on their Twitter and Pixiv. Would these count for anything?

post #11525661: https://x.com/jtpaeakw_5/status/2058430827080601761/photo/1
post #11484650: https://x.com/jtpaeakw_5/status/2059590660584612139/photo/1

asset #48720518, artist #650105
They say AI-training is prohibited for their art, but I'm seeing what may be melty lines in places, like at the edges of the sleeves and the belts. I'd like a second opinion on if these are ai-artifacts or something less nefarious. Edited to say I'm pretty convinced this is AI now.

ion288 said in forum #448605:

post #11592252
Flagged but not tagged. Is the comment valid?

Bra and panties definitely look very AI-generated to me. Blurry lace, inconsistent petal sizes and petal counts per flower (weird that they didn't just go with 5 petals each), and the center stamen areas of the flowers are inconsistent. On the bra, the connecting part above the bow looks weird. On the panties, it looks like there are two flowers with layered petals, and the flowers are arranged way more linearly than the randomer top. There's some artifacts around her ear fluff as well.

On the bikini version, the frills on her top looks pretty bad (and noticeably worse than the ones on the bottom). It's also interesting to me that the lingerie one has a colored foreground arm/boob, but the bikini version just has a black silhouette.

I think there's some human input though, in my opinion the variants have too much consistency to be just AI, especially when they do face variants.

NinjaPope said in forum #448646:

Sorry if this has been discussed earlier or has its own thread, but I noticed that the posts under awaawaneko got flagged and deleted. A couple posts have corresponding WIPs on their Twitter and Pixiv. Would these count for anything?

post #11525661: https://x.com/jtpaeakw_5/status/2058430827080601761/photo/1
post #11484650: https://x.com/jtpaeakw_5/status/2059590660584612139/photo/1

I'm not 100% confident because their style is inherently kind of messy, but I don't think these are legit. Toki's eyes look SO AI-generated to me. Her bangs bleed into her eyelashes, the pupil highlights are blurry and asymmetrical, the left eye has two highlights on the edge of her iris but her right eye only has one. Personally I think the eyes are also overall asymmetrical in that her right iris should be moved to the right, but that could be human error.

Placeholder1996 said in forum #449000:

asset #48720518, artist #650105
They say AI-training is prohibited for their art, but I'm seeing what may be melty lines in places, like at the edges of the sleeves and the belts. I'd like a second opinion on if these are ai-artifacts or something less nefarious. Edited to say I'm pretty convinced this is AI now.

Not ai.
1. https://x.com/mi_lycoreco/status/2067058530738442723
2. See asset #48789965, then see asset #48789971, asset #48789974, asset #48789976 (ai-gen sketch), you can see ai have obvious errors.