A sudden platinum upgrade raffle has appeared!

AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

wavedash

ion288 said in forum #445219:

post #11565001
Flag no tag. Are poorly drawn buttons enough to call AI?

The lace on her bra is also really bad. The bottom SFX is messy, with a broken ku, and the inconsistent stroke widths on the SFX and hearts is suspicious. The corner of the wall is weird, like it's a combination of a tiled wall and a public stall, and the metal clip thing also looks very weird, why isn't the arm centered?

post #11511860 also has bad lace.

Reply
sakurada ichigo

B17Bomber said in forum #445006:

I decided not to say anything last time this guy came up but at the time I was doing some research on my own.

I had a friend who's really good at spotting AI and by complete coincidence he's subbed to their Patreon so I got a tad of an inside angle to this klop guy.

my opinion is that post #9364489 was the last thing that he drew legit, and everything afterwards is Fully generated or heavily Assisted. imthe resolution and quality is way higher than the mess he's been putting out since. it's also the last thing he's posted on his Pixiv and my friend confirmed it's the last piece he's ever put out a WIP for.

[...]

sorry for the Essay. the TL;DR Im almost positive that klopsiak is a Prompter and should be flagged off this site. I didn't say much at the time because some approvers had different opinions at the time and my friend I been mentioning doesn't think he's a prompter.

Thanks for the insight! Pretty much confirms what I (and a lot of others) have suspected about this guy. The part about post #9364489 being one of the last legit artworks he put out makes sense too. It looked completely untouched by AI when I was looking through all of his stuff. Anything after that looked ai-upscaled or heavily altered by some AI slopification. No WIPs of his newer art and the resolution being the exact same for his Patreon releases adds to the evidence.

The one thing I'll say is that I don't believe his work is fully generated and rather, assisted. To me it looks like he's actually drawing everything first (in a rough-like form) then feeding it through AI, resulting in all the melted, ugly details.

My reason for believing that is this piece, (post #9422759) which to me, looks like his modern art but pre-slopified. Almost like he forgot to put it through an AI filter or something. None of the details are melted, but it still has the same style and coloring as his current stuff.

I think we should just continue using our best judgement and tag any of his new work accordingly, instead of assuming every single work is ai-assisted. For example, the latest upload of his didn't look ai-generated or assisted to me, so I didn't tag it as such (post #11556012).

Updated by sakurada ichigo

Reply
wavedash

AkaringoP said in forum #445227:

nekocat0721
https://www.pixiv.net/users/103062010

The early posts have AI tags, and the upload frequency is still high.

I didn't looked through the Pixiv, but I think all 3 posts here are AI-generated.
post #11559229 Lace bowtie thing looks sloppy. One of the leaves on her bikini top was accidentally drawn as a strawberry, and other leaves just general look kind of messy. Tips of her braids have some artifacts, bangs have some suspicious lines.
post #11556800 I'm not familiar with the character, but I feel like the edge of her hood is way too pointy, jagged, and random, compared to official art and most fan art. Collar thing looks kind of shitty
post #11513173 The worst hair of the three. Obvious problems in the bangs, hair bleeding into eyelashes. Inconsistent highlights in the eye iris.

Reply
NO AI ON DANBOORU

wavedash said in forum #445221:

The lace on her bra is also really bad. The bottom SFX is messy, with a broken ku, and the inconsistent stroke widths on the SFX and hearts is suspicious. The corner of the wall is weird, like it's a combination of a tiled wall and a public stall, and the metal clip thing also looks very weird, why isn't the arm centered?

post #11511860 also has bad lace.

It looks like just poorly drawing. I think 65% not AI.

Updated by NO AI ON DANBOORU

Reply
TartarusP

post #11581013

This art looks generated af, but if you look closer, it's mostly the lighting that makes up that effect. But if you look even closer what the fuck is this kitchen: oven below sink, right top handle is where hinges are, where is the left plant coming from etc.
Looked at other works and they are kinda the same. Also 20 pages of arts in 3 years. Has anyone made a vetting on this artist?

Reply
ANON TOKYO

NO_AI_ON_DANBOORU said in forum #445461:

AI can't generate these errors.

It can though, and I don't see why it wouldn't be able to in the first place. Something like post #11546618 has various example of underfill and overshoots.

fgbooru said in forum #445458:

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/145878686 (NSFW)

I ran it through some checkers, all came out negative, but I'm still not completely convinced.

Don't use checkers. Ever. You're probably better off flipping a coin.

Reply
1 248 249 250 251 252 253