BUR #61100 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication louhi_(fgo_fes._2026)_(fate) -> louhi_(fate)
Fes costume for Louhi
Posted under Tags
BUR #61100 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication louhi_(fgo_fes._2026)_(fate) -> louhi_(fate)
Fes costume for Louhi
The bulk update request #61100 (forum #445202) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #61258 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication harada_sanosuke_(fgo_fes._2026)_(fate) -> harada_sanosuke_(fate)
create implication harada_sanosuke_(teal_haori_and_hakama)_(fate) -> harada_sanosuke_(fate)
create implication hijikata_toshizou_(teal_haori_and_hakama)_(fate) -> hijikata_toshizou_(fate)
create implication kondou_isami_(breaching)_(fate) -> kondou_isami_(fate)
create implication kondou_isami_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> kondou_isami_(fate)
create implication kondou_isami_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> kondou_isami_(fate)
create implication okita_souji_(blossoming_under_the_crimson_sky)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(fate)
create implication okita_souji_(breaching)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(fate)
create implication okita_souji_(celebratory_attire)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(fate)
create implication okita_souji_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> okita_souji_(fate)
create implication toudou_heisuke_(fgo_fes._2026)_(fate) -> toudou_heisuke_(fate)
create implication toudou_heisuke_(satellite_station_26)_(fate) -> toudou_heisuke_(fate)
create implication toudou_heisuke_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> toudou_heisuke_(fate)
create implication toudou_heisuke_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> toudou_heisuke_(fate)
Missing Shinsengumi implications
The bulk update request #61258 (forum #447278) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #61353 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication tenochtitlan_(fgo_fes._2026)_(fate) -> tenochtitlan_(fate)
Fes costume for city girl.
BUR #61364 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication anastasia_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(fgo_fes._2018)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(fgo_fes._2025)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)
create implication astolfo_(still_in_the_middle_of_the_trip)_(fate) -> astolfo_(fate)
create implication dante_alighieri_(kyomaf_2025)_(fate) -> dante_alighieri_(fate)
create implication karna_(apocrypha_epilogue)_(fate) -> karna_(fate)
create implication karna_(fate/extella_link_x_treevillage)_(fate) -> karna_(fate)
create implication lilith_(kyomaf_2025)_(fate) -> lilith_(fate)
create implication morgan_le_fay_(fgo_fes._2025)_(fate) -> morgan_le_fay_(fate)
create implication vlad_iii_(pastoral_idol_unit)_(fate) -> vlad_iii_(fate/extra)
Going through any chartags with 'fate' in them and no antecedent tag like a neurotypical person and for whatever reason a bunch of these tags were missed by NNT's bot each time it ran (maybe because my previous BURs attempting to imply them for Anastasia and Astolfo [in what i now recognize was to incorrect antecedent tags, but that doesn't explain karna and lilith or why morgan fes was ignored but bureau morgan was noticed...] got rejected)?? Other than that some other oddball tricksters. Special mention to Lancelot (Dark Formal), which I have no idea whether to imply to Lancelot (Fate/Zero) or Berserker (Fate/Zero).
Other tags in that horrid search are more recent so presumably they would get picked up by NNT's bot whenever it bothers trying to run again with Fate. Probably. Maybe. and i just don't feel like it there's too many in this BUR already
BUR #61366 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename astolfo_(fate/extella_link_x_treevillage)_(fate) -> astolfo_(treevillage)_(fate)
rename karna_(fate/extella_link_x_treevillage)_(fate) -> karna_(treevillage)_(fate)
In my brain I hallucinated that the tagmoves for these costags from FGO x Collab to Collab happened in a different topic, but no it didn't, it was right here in forum #417067, so I found the thread to submit this in yay!
The bulk update request #61353 (forum #449963) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #61364 (forum #450103) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #61366 (forum #450107) has been approved by @nonamethanks.