Posted under General
The "Briar" posts that were uploaded recently make it extremely obvious. It's common for AI to do only the face when the prompt includes fantasy colored skin.
Earlier posts have more obvious AI errors, but images still have nonsensical edges and clearly repaired bits.
Updated by Veraducks
Artist has a legitimate streak up until their art style changed starting about here post #6826918. There's over a decade gap, but the art itself has weird tendencies in shading and just doesn't resemble the old style at all.
ilyivsky said in forum #439197:
Artist has a legitimate streak up until their art style changed starting about here post #6826918. There's over a decade gap, but the art itself has weird tendencies in shading and just doesn't resemble the old style at all.
Well yeah, all the posts prior were posted 13 years ago. Many artists go through shifts like that, so I fail to see the problem here. Looks like just normal artistic style development to me.
Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #439198:
Well yeah, all the posts prior were posted 13 years ago. Many artists go through shifts like that, so I fail to see the problem here. Looks like just normal artistic style development to me.
Actually, the biggest thing is that they've switch accounts entirely. Their old Pixiv is still up, but this new one migrated randomly. It feels like someone is latching on to this artist tag.
Then there's the art: post #10419067. The latex leotard has a very overly-shiny look whereas the rest of the image doesn't pay attention at all to plastic sheen. Then there's her mouth looking a little off.
ilyivsky said in forum #439200:
Actually, the biggest thing is that they've switch accounts entirely. Their old Pixiv is still up, but this new one migrated randomly. It feels like someone is latching on to this artist tag.
Then there's the art: post #10419067. The latex leotard has a very overly-shiny look whereas the rest of the image doesn't pay attention at all to plastic sheen. Then there's her mouth looking a little off.
I notice the artist posts WIPs for a lot of his images on xitter. Are there any irregularities between those and the finished equivalents, or in the WIP images themselves?
The source looks suspicious. Doesn't seem to be an artist, more of a reposter that also includes AI slop by other users.
VR-Man said in forum #439235:
The source looks suspicious. Doesn't seem to be an artist, more of a reposter that also includes AI slop by other users.
There seems to be a lot of asymmetry going on with Golshi's dress and a lot of the tiny details that look mushy, asset #48260668
The bag connector looks like it doesn't really hook on to anything, asset #48260681, and a terrible attempt at an o-ring asset #48260689.
VR-Man said in forum #439235:
The source looks suspicious. Doesn't seem to be an artist, more of a reposter that also includes AI slop by other users.
Yeah, that's AI. There are melty lines everywhere, including the ornament under her bowtie (not sure what it's called), the buttons on her dress, the belt, the bag, and the things on the side of her head (again, not sure what the name is). Edit, the grid on the field behind her disappears at points.
Updated by Placeholder1996
Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #439198:
Well yeah, all the posts prior were posted 13 years ago. Many artists go through shifts like that, so I fail to see the problem here. Looks like just normal artistic style development to me.
I don't think so.
post #6983813 is obviously ai-gen: asset #48260553, 1000 res, especially eyes, you can found similar eyes on other works on 2023.
post #6983792 and post #6983797 have different width cuffs.
i think 2023 all artworks are ai-gen, now ai assisted.
https://x.com/Bogmire64/status/2054578412132438050?s=20 is this AI? the comment on his profile about being a new digital artist rubs me the wrong way.
och8 said in forum #439378:
https://x.com/Bogmire64/status/2054578412132438050?s=20 is this AI? the comment on his profile about being a new digital artist rubs me the wrong way.
I don't think so. I uploaded him before and I looked over the piece I uploaded and his other earlier works. And for the new artist thing, he's been at it for 2 years on Twitter and you can see the progression.
B17Bomber said in forum #439401:
I don't think so. I uploaded him before and I looked over the piece I uploaded and his other earlier works. And for the new artist thing, he's been at it for 2 years on Twitter and you can see the progression.
Yeah I can see the progression in the art and thats what rubbed me wrong with the comment on top. You can see a leap in quality from mid March https://x.com/Bogmire64/status/2033917803980325365?s=20 to end of April post #11268707
Maybe I am little paranoid from already uploading a handful of ai pics. What do you like about the b17?
Beginning with post #11255219, I noticed that Elf's art went through a rather noticable change - the previously messy sketch style seems to have disappeared and the linework has become much cleaner and there is shading in areas that they didn't previously do before. In particular, on post #11344947, the sheen on the bunny suit reminds me of the AI-generated sheen I've seen on generated images - at best, I feel like Elf is going ai-assisted on the bodies of the characters, if not going for fully-generated pieces.
Can someone tell me if this Youtube video is AI?
NCX said in forum #439410:
Beginning with post #11255219, I noticed that Elf's art went through a rather noticable change - the previously messy sketch style seems to have disappeared and the linework has become much cleaner and there is shading in areas that they didn't previously do before. In particular, on post #11344947, the sheen on the bunny suit reminds me of the AI-generated sheen I've seen on generated images - at best, I feel like Elf is going ai-assisted on the bodies of the characters, if not going for fully-generated pieces.
Yes, it's ai-assisted since post #11255219.
See: asset #48273366, asset #48273381, asset #48273425.
NO_AI_ON_DANBOORU said in forum #439422:
Yes, it's ai-assisted since post #11255219.
See: asset #48273366, asset #48273381, asset #48273425.
"See" what? Those are normal pictures. Are you just making shit up now? One of those is just skindentation.
Updated by nonamethanks
Idiot_Man said in forum #439422:
Yes, it's ai-assisted since post #11255219.
See: asset #48273366, asset #48273381, asset #48273425.
yeah I don't see it either. They have a long history on here. almost 15 years, and their progression looks natural. I've seen artists get significantly better within weeks and it's not because they use AI. the difference in quality can be as simple as looking at a tutorial or a book or just practicing their fundamentals or simply changing their brushes.
Enough with Essay posting but yeah I don't think they using AI at all, even assisted.
TBH, I do find these locks of hair in post #11291422 pretty weird:
I see it pretty often on AI, because it doesn't understand how hair falls naturally. What makes it weirder to me is that they don't seem to have these on any of their other drawings of this character. I wouldn't say this alone is enough to call it AI though, even with the slightly asymmetrical dress pins (?) flower thingies.
inconsistent side-tie_bikini_bottom design
post #11307732
post #11306603
a different o-ring_bikini design but the ring between cups is just glued there
post #11365793
bad see-through shirt and the frilled strap on the shoulder connected to nothing
post #11264149
I would say they still need to spend another 15 years learning how to draw, if they didn't use AI.
post #10852582 AI gen? Ear looks like it's blending with the hair instead of being behind it or visible through a semi-translucent hair, eye looks mushy. The account also seems to have been completely wiped after this post.
