Tag script and removing implication

To remove a tag all implications must be also removed. This can get quite cumbersome if a tag has many implications. For example my current tag script for removing the breasts tag is:

-breasts -small_breasts -medium_breasts -large_breasts -gigantic_breasts -huge_breasts -cleavage -underboob -perky_breasts -sagging_breasts -breasts_out -sideboob -mole_on_breast -cum_on_breasts -hanging_breasts -grabbing_own_breast -between_breasts -strap_between_breasts -ascot_between_breasts -clothes_between_breasts -breasts_apart

A list that grows and grows. Do we have a syntax to remove breasts and all of it's implications?

Why would you remove breasts?

I saw you removed it from post #11102906. I'm not sure about male with breasts there since the "male" in the picture looks absolutely like a girl and we only have author's word on the matter, but medium_breasts still seems to apply anyway.

We don't have any syntax with the tag script mode for it and I'm not entirely sure if any mode menu tooling supports it but I figure it's worth showing you that it's possible to see every tag that can add breasts either because of a direct implication or because the final upstream tag is breasts (great for checking multi-level implications):

https://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_implications?search[implied_to]=breasts&search[status]=active

What the fuck are you doing?

mieoi said in forum #437980:

Why would you remove breasts?

I saw you removed it from post #11102906. I'm not sure about male with breasts there since the "male" in the picture looks absolutely like a girl and we only have author's word on the matter, but medium_breasts still seems to apply anyway.

Do we not use pectorals and especially manboobs in this case?

The question is: Do we use breasts for male characters? It's a bit of a swamp of unsharp definitions...

If you don't know for sure or what you're doing could end up potentially controversial then you really need to be creating a forum post first to discuss what changes you're going to or want to make, or to get clarification or consensus about the stance you're putting forward. You shouldn't be unilaterally changing a huge amount of posts, some even wrongly, if you don't even know what you're doing. Like I don't know how you see post #408636 tagged with male with breasts and decide "breasts shouldn't apply".

nyatbn said in forum #438026:

Do we not use pectorals and especially manboobs in this case?

The question is: Do we use breasts for male characters? It's a bit of a swamp of unsharp definitions...

Actually yes, wiki is a bit of mess on this subject.

In my opinion, if breasts look like female breasts, then it is breasts, regardless of whether they are on a girl, on a man or on a trap. This seems to be the way everyone tags it, too.

My undestanding:

• breasts are for female-looking breasts (post #11325511, post #408636). Male characters with female breasts are also tagged male_with_breasts;
• pectorals are for male-looking breasts (post #11322602, post #11177692);
• manboobs is for fatty or breast-like looking pectorals (but also for breasts, for some reason). It can be on fat men (post #11276500), on slimmer men with female breasts (post #5025833) or on muscular men (post #4123358);
• flat chest is for female-looking characters (post #11322718, post #10768031).

There is also gynecomastia that looks like male_with_breasts trap and I honestly don't know the difference. Like, yes, it is a hormonal disorder, but I don't understand how to determine this for a fictional character unless author explicitly says that.

It is not clear what's the difference between manboobs and male_with_breasts. I expected manboobs to be for fatty pectorals of fat men and male_with_breasts for fetish or joke content, but apparently that's not the case, according to wiki.

It is not clearly stated on wiki that breasts is for female-looking breasts, but this rule is implied by tag male_with_breasts for male-looking characters with female breasts.

I also assume that male-looking breasts on female characters are tagged pectorals and that flat chest also includes male-looking-like-female characters unless it looks like pectorals. This would make sense.

And also I'm a bluename, so opinion of someone else is needed. And it's probably better to create a new topic about sorting out breast tags if anyone is interested in cleaning all this.

WRS said in forum #438028:

If you don't know for sure or what you're doing could end up potentially controversial then you really need to be creating a forum post first to discuss what changes you're going to or want to make, or to get clarification or consensus about the stance you're putting forward. You shouldn't be unilaterally changing a huge amount of posts, some even wrongly, if you don't even know what you're doing. Like I don't know how you see post #408636 tagged with male with breasts and decide "breasts shouldn't apply".

I missed the male_with_breasts tag. Which led to the confusion. I worked through earlier edits and corrected them accordingly. Of course i still removed the breasts tag when no breasts where shown, which applied for most of the edits.

mieoi said in forum #438036:

Actually yes, wiki is a bit of mess on this subject.
...

After reading the wiki of male_with_breasts i came to the same conclusion. I also think this should be part of the breasts entry.

• breasts female looking breasts
• pectorals male chest muscles. Wiki excludes female characters.
• manboobs basically just male body fat that forms something similar to breasts (overlaps with male with breasts)
• flat_chest no breasts at all and only applies to females
• gynecomastia seldom condition which must be derived from the context

For my two cents gynecomastia seems like a padding canon-tag for hong_iltak and I think most of it looks like puffy chest.

I don't think manboobs should have breasts since I doubt it's what most people searching boobs want to get, but male with breasts makes sense to tag since the whole point of the tag is it's female anatomy.

nyatbn said in forum #438057:

• pectorals male chest muscles. Wiki excludes female characters.

It excludes female characters, but honestly, I think it shouldn't. How else can you tag muscular women like post #9485802?